卡诺亚斯(巴西)和卡斯凯(葡萄牙)的参与性预算。成功驱动因素的比较分析

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Civil Society Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/17448689.2020.1788246
Roberto Falanga, Lígia Helena Hahn Lüchmann, A. Nicoletti, H. Domingos
{"title":"卡诺亚斯(巴西)和卡斯凯(葡萄牙)的参与性预算。成功驱动因素的比较分析","authors":"Roberto Falanga, Lígia Helena Hahn Lüchmann, A. Nicoletti, H. Domingos","doi":"10.1080/17448689.2020.1788246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is a comparative analysis of two internationally awarded cases of Participatory Budgets in Canoas (Brazil) and Cascais (Portugal). Our main argument is that the success of these PBs relies on political/administrative, societal, and geographic drivers. This conceptual model has been adopted to analyse and discuss the success of the two case studies. The provision of an original conceptual model for comparative analysis and the empirical knowledge from the two cities are supported by the review of main literature in this field of study, and aim to contribute, with original findings, to the international debate on participatory budgeting.","PeriodicalId":46013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17448689.2020.1788246","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participatory budgets in Canoas (Brazil) and Cascais (Portugal). A comparative analysis of the drivers of success\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Falanga, Lígia Helena Hahn Lüchmann, A. Nicoletti, H. Domingos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17448689.2020.1788246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article is a comparative analysis of two internationally awarded cases of Participatory Budgets in Canoas (Brazil) and Cascais (Portugal). Our main argument is that the success of these PBs relies on political/administrative, societal, and geographic drivers. This conceptual model has been adopted to analyse and discuss the success of the two case studies. The provision of an original conceptual model for comparative analysis and the empirical knowledge from the two cities are supported by the review of main literature in this field of study, and aim to contribute, with original findings, to the international debate on participatory budgeting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Civil Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17448689.2020.1788246\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Civil Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1788246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1788246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要本文对巴西卡诺亚斯和葡萄牙卡斯凯的两个参与式预算国际案例进行了比较分析。我们的主要论点是,这些PB的成功取决于政治/行政、社会和地理驱动因素。采用这一概念模型来分析和讨论两个案例研究的成功。提供一个用于比较分析的原始概念模型和来自这两个城市的经验知识得到了这一研究领域主要文献的审查的支持,其目的是以原始发现为参与式预算编制的国际辩论做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Participatory budgets in Canoas (Brazil) and Cascais (Portugal). A comparative analysis of the drivers of success
ABSTRACT This article is a comparative analysis of two internationally awarded cases of Participatory Budgets in Canoas (Brazil) and Cascais (Portugal). Our main argument is that the success of these PBs relies on political/administrative, societal, and geographic drivers. This conceptual model has been adopted to analyse and discuss the success of the two case studies. The provision of an original conceptual model for comparative analysis and the empirical knowledge from the two cities are supported by the review of main literature in this field of study, and aim to contribute, with original findings, to the international debate on participatory budgeting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Civil Society
Journal of Civil Society POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Civil society and governance. A survey of local authority and NPO collaboration from an institutional perspective Enabling role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in local environmental management in the Philippines: A systematic review Claiming space in civil society. Young Muslim moral personhoods in Bangladesh and Italy Advocating for human rights of LGBTIQ+ persons in multilevel governance systems Contextual factors influencing voluntary organizations’ inclusiveness and individual participation in leisure activities: The Case of Norway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1