贸易限制是反周期的吗?来自一个新的综合衡量标准的证据

IF 3.5 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Policy Modeling Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.04.008
Julia Estefania-Flores , Davide Furceri , Swarnali A. Hannan , Jonathan D. Ostry , Andrew K. Rose
{"title":"贸易限制是反周期的吗?来自一个新的综合衡量标准的证据","authors":"Julia Estefania-Flores ,&nbsp;Davide Furceri ,&nbsp;Swarnali A. Hannan ,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Ostry ,&nbsp;Andrew K. Rose","doi":"10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present a new Measure of Aggregate Trade Restrictions (MATR) using data from <em>the IMF’s Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions</em>. MATR is strongly correlated with existing measures of trade restrictiveness but more comprehensive in terms of country and time coverage. Our measure is available for an unbalanced sample of up to 157 countries during 1949–2019. We use our new MATR to re-examine how trade restrictiveness varies with the business cycle. Our results confirm that trade restrictions are typically a-cyclical but there is an important difference across income groups: aggregate trade restrictions are a-cyclical in advanced economies but are counter-cyclical in EMDEs, especially in response to increases in unemployment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Modeling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are trade restrictions counter-cyclical? Evidence from a new aggregate measure\",\"authors\":\"Julia Estefania-Flores ,&nbsp;Davide Furceri ,&nbsp;Swarnali A. Hannan ,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Ostry ,&nbsp;Andrew K. Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We present a new Measure of Aggregate Trade Restrictions (MATR) using data from <em>the IMF’s Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions</em>. MATR is strongly correlated with existing measures of trade restrictiveness but more comprehensive in terms of country and time coverage. Our measure is available for an unbalanced sample of up to 157 countries during 1949–2019. We use our new MATR to re-examine how trade restrictiveness varies with the business cycle. Our results confirm that trade restrictions are typically a-cyclical but there is an important difference across income groups: aggregate trade restrictions are a-cyclical in advanced economies but are counter-cyclical in EMDEs, especially in response to increases in unemployment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policy Modeling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policy Modeling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893823000807\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893823000807","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用国际货币基金组织关于外汇安排和外汇限制的年度报告中的数据,提出了一种新的贸易限制总量衡量(MATR)。最低限额与现有的贸易限制措施密切相关,但在国家和时间范围方面更为全面。我们的衡量标准适用于1949年至2019年期间多达157个国家的不平衡样本。我们使用新的MATR来重新审视贸易限制如何随着商业周期而变化。我们的研究结果证实,贸易限制通常是周期性的,但不同收入群体之间存在重要差异:发达经济体的总体贸易限制是周期性的,但新兴市场国家的总体贸易限制是逆周期的,尤其是在应对失业率上升时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are trade restrictions counter-cyclical? Evidence from a new aggregate measure

We present a new Measure of Aggregate Trade Restrictions (MATR) using data from the IMF’s Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions. MATR is strongly correlated with existing measures of trade restrictiveness but more comprehensive in terms of country and time coverage. Our measure is available for an unbalanced sample of up to 157 countries during 1949–2019. We use our new MATR to re-examine how trade restrictiveness varies with the business cycle. Our results confirm that trade restrictions are typically a-cyclical but there is an important difference across income groups: aggregate trade restrictions are a-cyclical in advanced economies but are counter-cyclical in EMDEs, especially in response to increases in unemployment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The Journal of Policy Modeling is published by Elsevier for the Society for Policy Modeling to provide a forum for analysis and debate concerning international policy issues. The journal addresses questions of critical import to the world community as a whole, and it focuses upon the economic, social, and political interdependencies between national and regional systems. This implies concern with international policies for the promotion of a better life for all human beings and, therefore, concentrates on improved methodological underpinnings for dealing with these problems.
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Immigration and the distribution of income, consumption and wealth in the euro area: Implications for economic policies Fed and ECB reaction functions during quantitative easing: Three phases of monetary policy, both conventional and unconventional How do carbon prices spill over along global supply chains? The impact on Europe and Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1