BCMS中的安东诺玛西亚和女性在巴尔干社会中的地位

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SLAWISTIK Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1515/slaw-2021-0009
Deja Piletić, Milica Vuković Stamatović
{"title":"BCMS中的安东诺玛西亚和女性在巴尔干社会中的地位","authors":"Deja Piletić, Milica Vuković Stamatović","doi":"10.1515/slaw-2021-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Antonomasia implies two opposing semantic mechanisms: the replacement of a proper name by an appellative, epithet or periphrasis (e. g. the Iron Lady standing for Margaret Thatcher), or the attribution of a proper name to an appellative or a set of certain personality traits (e. g. a Penelope standing for a faithful, devoted wife). The aim of this paper is to show that studying antonomasia as a figure of speech driven by a cognitive metonymic and metaphoric mechanism can contribute to revealing how women are conceptualised and consequently talked about. We do so by analysing figurative antonomasia in a dataset of 307 examples extracted from Bosnian/Croatian/Montenegrin/Serbian (BCMS) webpages, although the findings are generisable to other languages as well. We show that antonomasia is frequently based on entrenched stereotypes about women and that in the collective consciousness of the BCMS speakers women are often conceptualised as (sexual) objects, typically valued by aesthetic criteria, as well as in relation to their possession of certain stereotypical female traits (self-sacrifice or subordination to others, excessive emotion but also cruelty, manipulativeness, showiness, talkativeness, etc.). In addition, the analysis also revealed that a woman is principally identified through her relations with other beings (as a mother, sister, wife or lover). Our study thus confirms that studying antonomasia within gender and language studies is a goal well worth pursuing.","PeriodicalId":41834,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SLAWISTIK","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antonomasia in BCMS and a woman’s place in the Balkan society\",\"authors\":\"Deja Piletić, Milica Vuković Stamatović\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/slaw-2021-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Antonomasia implies two opposing semantic mechanisms: the replacement of a proper name by an appellative, epithet or periphrasis (e. g. the Iron Lady standing for Margaret Thatcher), or the attribution of a proper name to an appellative or a set of certain personality traits (e. g. a Penelope standing for a faithful, devoted wife). The aim of this paper is to show that studying antonomasia as a figure of speech driven by a cognitive metonymic and metaphoric mechanism can contribute to revealing how women are conceptualised and consequently talked about. We do so by analysing figurative antonomasia in a dataset of 307 examples extracted from Bosnian/Croatian/Montenegrin/Serbian (BCMS) webpages, although the findings are generisable to other languages as well. We show that antonomasia is frequently based on entrenched stereotypes about women and that in the collective consciousness of the BCMS speakers women are often conceptualised as (sexual) objects, typically valued by aesthetic criteria, as well as in relation to their possession of certain stereotypical female traits (self-sacrifice or subordination to others, excessive emotion but also cruelty, manipulativeness, showiness, talkativeness, etc.). In addition, the analysis also revealed that a woman is principally identified through her relations with other beings (as a mother, sister, wife or lover). Our study thus confirms that studying antonomasia within gender and language studies is a goal well worth pursuing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SLAWISTIK\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SLAWISTIK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/slaw-2021-0009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SLAWISTIK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/slaw-2021-0009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通称异名意味着两种相反的语义机制:用称谓、绰号或委婉语代替专有名称(例如,铁娘子代表玛格丽特·撒切尔),或者将专有名称归因于称谓或一系列特定的人格特征(例如,佩内洛普代表忠诚、忠诚的妻子)。本文的目的是表明,通过认知转喻和隐喻机制驱动的对象化研究有助于揭示女性是如何被概念化并因此被谈论的。我们通过分析从波斯尼亚/克罗地亚/黑山/塞尔维亚(BCMS)网页中提取的307个例子的数据集中的比喻拟声法来做到这一点,尽管研究结果也适用于其他语言。我们发现,失调症通常是基于对女性根深蒂固的刻板印象,在BCMS使用者的集体意识中,女性通常被概念化为(性)对象,通常由审美标准来衡量,以及与她们拥有某些刻板的女性特征(自我牺牲或服从他人,过度情感,但也有残忍,操纵,炫耀,健谈等)有关。此外,分析还表明,女性主要是通过她与其他生物的关系(如母亲、姐妹、妻子或情人)来确定的。因此,我们的研究证实,在性别和语言研究中研究语意失调是一个值得追求的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antonomasia in BCMS and a woman’s place in the Balkan society
Summary Antonomasia implies two opposing semantic mechanisms: the replacement of a proper name by an appellative, epithet or periphrasis (e. g. the Iron Lady standing for Margaret Thatcher), or the attribution of a proper name to an appellative or a set of certain personality traits (e. g. a Penelope standing for a faithful, devoted wife). The aim of this paper is to show that studying antonomasia as a figure of speech driven by a cognitive metonymic and metaphoric mechanism can contribute to revealing how women are conceptualised and consequently talked about. We do so by analysing figurative antonomasia in a dataset of 307 examples extracted from Bosnian/Croatian/Montenegrin/Serbian (BCMS) webpages, although the findings are generisable to other languages as well. We show that antonomasia is frequently based on entrenched stereotypes about women and that in the collective consciousness of the BCMS speakers women are often conceptualised as (sexual) objects, typically valued by aesthetic criteria, as well as in relation to their possession of certain stereotypical female traits (self-sacrifice or subordination to others, excessive emotion but also cruelty, manipulativeness, showiness, talkativeness, etc.). In addition, the analysis also revealed that a woman is principally identified through her relations with other beings (as a mother, sister, wife or lover). Our study thus confirms that studying antonomasia within gender and language studies is a goal well worth pursuing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SLAWISTIK
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SLAWISTIK LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: "Zeitschrift für Slawistik" publishes critical essays on language and literature, on popular poetry and on the cultural history of Slavic people in the past and present. Special attention is paid to German-Slavic linguistic, literary and cultural relations within their European context, to onomastics, history and poetology of literary genres, Baltic studies, Sorbic studies, and to the history of Slavic studies. Literary reports and reviews give an insight into current tendencies and developments in international Slavonic research. Conference proceedings provide information about important academic events.
期刊最新文献
Montenegrin women in Italian travel writing (1896–1906) Cognitive Grammar Analysis Free Relative Clauses in Croatian Glagolitic Folk Medicine Books Spezifika der Übersetzung von medizinischen Texten Zu Besonderheiten des Fachbegriffes ublíženie na zdraví aus der Perspektive des Strafrechts in der Slowakei und in Deutschland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1