获取911录音:平衡隐私利益和公众对死亡的知情权

Erin K. Coyle, Stephanie L. Whitenack
{"title":"获取911录音:平衡隐私利益和公众对死亡的知情权","authors":"Erin K. Coyle, Stephanie L. Whitenack","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2019.1627796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Publicly disclosing 911 recordings sometimes sheds light on important matters of public interest. Nonetheless, some state statutes, court opinions, and attorneys general opinions recognize surviving family members’ privacy rights may be harmed by publicly disclosing such recordings when they involve deaths. States take a variety of approaches to balance privacy interests with interests in disclosing 911 records. In some instances, states have found that the likelihood of harm to privacy justified exempting from disclosure 911 call records. This article recommends that states require in camera court review of 911 call recordings related to deaths for judges to assess whether releasing the records would serve a public interest that outweighs interests in nondisclosure.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2019.1627796","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to 911 Recordings: Balancing Privacy Interests and the Public’s Right to Know about Deaths\",\"authors\":\"Erin K. Coyle, Stephanie L. Whitenack\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10811680.2019.1627796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Publicly disclosing 911 recordings sometimes sheds light on important matters of public interest. Nonetheless, some state statutes, court opinions, and attorneys general opinions recognize surviving family members’ privacy rights may be harmed by publicly disclosing such recordings when they involve deaths. States take a variety of approaches to balance privacy interests with interests in disclosing 911 records. In some instances, states have found that the likelihood of harm to privacy justified exempting from disclosure 911 call records. This article recommends that states require in camera court review of 911 call recordings related to deaths for judges to assess whether releasing the records would serve a public interest that outweighs interests in nondisclosure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Law and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2019.1627796\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2019.1627796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2019.1627796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公开披露911录音有时会揭示公众利益的重要问题。尽管如此,一些州法规、法院意见和总检察长意见承认,在涉及死亡的情况下,公开披露此类录音可能会损害幸存家庭成员的隐私权。各州采取了多种方法来平衡隐私利益与披露911记录的利益。在某些情况下,各州发现,隐私受到损害的可能性有理由免于披露911电话记录。这篇文章建议各州要求法庭对与死亡有关的911电话录音进行秘密审查,以便法官评估公布这些录音是否符合公众利益,而不是保密利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Access to 911 Recordings: Balancing Privacy Interests and the Public’s Right to Know about Deaths
Publicly disclosing 911 recordings sometimes sheds light on important matters of public interest. Nonetheless, some state statutes, court opinions, and attorneys general opinions recognize surviving family members’ privacy rights may be harmed by publicly disclosing such recordings when they involve deaths. States take a variety of approaches to balance privacy interests with interests in disclosing 911 records. In some instances, states have found that the likelihood of harm to privacy justified exempting from disclosure 911 call records. This article recommends that states require in camera court review of 911 call recordings related to deaths for judges to assess whether releasing the records would serve a public interest that outweighs interests in nondisclosure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The societal, cultural, economic and political dimensions of communication, including the freedoms of speech and press, are undergoing dramatic global changes. The convergence of the mass media, telecommunications, and computers has raised important questions reflected in analyses of modern communication law, policy, and regulation. Serving as a forum for discussions of these continuing and emerging questions, Communication Law and Policy considers traditional and contemporary problems of freedom of expression and dissemination, including theoretical, conceptual and methodological issues inherent in the special conditions presented by new media and information technologies.
期刊最新文献
Channeled Beneath International Law: Mapping Infrastructure and Regulatory Capture as Israeli–American Hegemonic Reinforcers in Palestine Digital Rights in Europe After the Entry Into Force of Regulations for the Protection of Personal Data: Before and After the Right to Be Forgotten Regulatory Capture in a Transitional Democracy: Media Laws in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq Paranoid Androids: Free Speech Versus Privacy in America’s Resistance Against Intrusive Robocalls An Unreasonable Standard?: The Dilemma of Applying Actual Malice to Irrational Speakers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1