WTO保障法学中专家组与上诉机构的司法冲突

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of World Trade Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.54648/trad2020041
Duk-Kyun Ahn, Hyerim Kim
{"title":"WTO保障法学中专家组与上诉机构的司法冲突","authors":"Duk-Kyun Ahn, Hyerim Kim","doi":"10.54648/trad2020041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interestingly, there occur huge discrepancies in understanding and interpretation of the safeguard system between the World Trade Organization (WTO) panels and the Appellate Body (AB), even in its core concepts ranging from pre-conditions such as unforeseen developments to import increases, causation, types of injury, and permissible extent of the measure. These phenomena, which originate from the different approaches – contextual or literal – have contributed to the current debacles in the WTO dispute settlement system as well as egregious misuse of safeguard measures by WTO members. Future endeavours to reform the WTO system should therefore pay more attention to the safeguard system, especially where it causes unsettling jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":46019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial Conflicts between Panels and the Appellate Body in the WTO Safeguard Jurisprudence\",\"authors\":\"Duk-Kyun Ahn, Hyerim Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/trad2020041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interestingly, there occur huge discrepancies in understanding and interpretation of the safeguard system between the World Trade Organization (WTO) panels and the Appellate Body (AB), even in its core concepts ranging from pre-conditions such as unforeseen developments to import increases, causation, types of injury, and permissible extent of the measure. These phenomena, which originate from the different approaches – contextual or literal – have contributed to the current debacles in the WTO dispute settlement system as well as egregious misuse of safeguard measures by WTO members. Future endeavours to reform the WTO system should therefore pay more attention to the safeguard system, especially where it causes unsettling jurisprudence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Trade\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2020041\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2020041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有趣的是,世界贸易组织(WTO)专家组和上诉机构(AB)对保障制度的理解和解释存在巨大差异,即使是在其核心概念上,从不可预见的发展等先决条件到进口增加、因果关系、损害类型和措施的允许程度。这些现象源于不同的方法-上下文或字面-促成了当前世贸组织争端解决机制的崩溃以及世贸组织成员对保障措施的严重滥用。因此,今后改革世贸组织体制的努力应更多地关注保障制度,特别是在保障制度引起令人不安的判例方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Judicial Conflicts between Panels and the Appellate Body in the WTO Safeguard Jurisprudence
Interestingly, there occur huge discrepancies in understanding and interpretation of the safeguard system between the World Trade Organization (WTO) panels and the Appellate Body (AB), even in its core concepts ranging from pre-conditions such as unforeseen developments to import increases, causation, types of injury, and permissible extent of the measure. These phenomena, which originate from the different approaches – contextual or literal – have contributed to the current debacles in the WTO dispute settlement system as well as egregious misuse of safeguard measures by WTO members. Future endeavours to reform the WTO system should therefore pay more attention to the safeguard system, especially where it causes unsettling jurisprudence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Far and away the most thought-provoking and informative journal in its field, the Journal of World Trade sets the agenda for both scholarship and policy initiatives in this most critical area of international relations. It is the only journal which deals authoritatively with the most crucial issues affecting world trade today.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking Test Data Protection in China-US Trade War: Integrating Empirical and Normative Analysis The WTO and Using Digital Economy Technologies: Surviving the Race With Preferential Trade Agreements A Tale of Too Little: Anti-dumping Tariff Between SAFTA Contracting Parties Game Analysis of Different Source Disclosure Model for Genetic Resources and Implications for China Improving Export Credit Agency Impact Through Full Faith and Credit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1