供体人群恒河猴系统抗原流行特征分析

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology International Journal of Biology and Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2021-04-15 DOI:10.46300/91011.2021.15.10
M. Nagervadze, L. Akvlediani, I. Tsintsadze, T. Koiava, R. Loria, S. Tskvitinidze, R. Khukhunaishvili, M. Koridze
{"title":"供体人群恒河猴系统抗原流行特征分析","authors":"M. Nagervadze, L. Akvlediani, I. Tsintsadze, T. Koiava, R. Loria, S. Tskvitinidze, R. Khukhunaishvili, M. Koridze","doi":"10.46300/91011.2021.15.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research materials and methods. 852 voluntary Georgian blood donors have been typed on red blood cells group antigens. The research materials have taken from the diagnostic laboratory of Health Centre of Batumi (Georgia republic). The immunoserological methods with monoclonal anti –AB, -B, -A, A1, -A2 (H), -C, -c, - D, -E, -e (Bio-Rad, cypress diagnostics) antibodies was used for typing blood. The ID cards, such as ABO/D + Reverse Grouping (Bio-Rad) were also used for typing of erythrocyte antigens. Result. Prevalence of Rh system antigens in the studied group is looks like so: e antigens – 94,6%, c antigens -85%, C-68,03, E antigens - 38,07%. The majority (84%) of the studied donors are Rh-positive (n=719), 133 (16%) donors are Rh-negative. C antigen most common is present in the combination with D antigen. 65, 8 % case donors had CD+ combination (n=561). E antigen in most cases is presented with a combination of D antigen. 36, 9% of the studied donors (n=306) had ED+ combination. A miserable number of studied donors had CD - (2,23%; n=19) and ED - (1,17%; n=9) combinations. We have studied the Rh phenotypes prevalence in blood donors. According to RHD, RHC, and RHE gene loci, there are 18 theoretically possible phenotypical groups. Among them half (nine) are Rh-positive and the rest of them are Rh-negative. The Rh-positive phenotypes are: CDE; CDEe; CDe; CcDE; CcDEe; CcDe; ccDE; cDEe and cDe. Rh-negative phenotypes are CdE; CdEe; Cde; CcdE; CcdEe; Ccde; cdE; cdEe; cde. We allocated 17 Rh phenotypes among studied donors. Only one phenotype CdE, which belongs to Rh negative group, was not present in studied donors. Other 17 phenotypes showed different frequencies. Some of them were only in a single case, for example, cdEe, cdE, CdEe phenotypes had only one donor. The majority of the phenotype in he studied donors (27,8±1,53%) was CcDe (n=237). CcDEe -19,3±1,35% (n=165); 125 donors have CDe phenotype (14,6±1,2); The frequency of cde was 13,1±1,5%, which means that 112 studied donors belonged to this phenotype group; 87 studied donors had cDEe phenotype characteristics (10,2%); The frequency of cDe was 4,9% (n=42); 19 donors had CDEe phenotype. Other phenotypes (CDE, Cde, CcdEe, Ccde) frequency was very low. Conclusion. Our studied donors are characterized by rather high polymorphism. The Georgian donor’s population is heterogenic, especially high heterogeneity are shown in Rh positive phenotypes. The obtained data is vital importance for the preparation of whole blood or certain blood components for the purpose of their rational usage in blood transfusion.","PeriodicalId":53488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biology and Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Features of Antigen Prevalence of Rhesus System in Donor Population\",\"authors\":\"M. Nagervadze, L. Akvlediani, I. Tsintsadze, T. Koiava, R. Loria, S. Tskvitinidze, R. Khukhunaishvili, M. Koridze\",\"doi\":\"10.46300/91011.2021.15.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research materials and methods. 852 voluntary Georgian blood donors have been typed on red blood cells group antigens. The research materials have taken from the diagnostic laboratory of Health Centre of Batumi (Georgia republic). The immunoserological methods with monoclonal anti –AB, -B, -A, A1, -A2 (H), -C, -c, - D, -E, -e (Bio-Rad, cypress diagnostics) antibodies was used for typing blood. The ID cards, such as ABO/D + Reverse Grouping (Bio-Rad) were also used for typing of erythrocyte antigens. Result. Prevalence of Rh system antigens in the studied group is looks like so: e antigens – 94,6%, c antigens -85%, C-68,03, E antigens - 38,07%. The majority (84%) of the studied donors are Rh-positive (n=719), 133 (16%) donors are Rh-negative. C antigen most common is present in the combination with D antigen. 65, 8 % case donors had CD+ combination (n=561). E antigen in most cases is presented with a combination of D antigen. 36, 9% of the studied donors (n=306) had ED+ combination. A miserable number of studied donors had CD - (2,23%; n=19) and ED - (1,17%; n=9) combinations. We have studied the Rh phenotypes prevalence in blood donors. According to RHD, RHC, and RHE gene loci, there are 18 theoretically possible phenotypical groups. Among them half (nine) are Rh-positive and the rest of them are Rh-negative. The Rh-positive phenotypes are: CDE; CDEe; CDe; CcDE; CcDEe; CcDe; ccDE; cDEe and cDe. Rh-negative phenotypes are CdE; CdEe; Cde; CcdE; CcdEe; Ccde; cdE; cdEe; cde. We allocated 17 Rh phenotypes among studied donors. Only one phenotype CdE, which belongs to Rh negative group, was not present in studied donors. Other 17 phenotypes showed different frequencies. Some of them were only in a single case, for example, cdEe, cdE, CdEe phenotypes had only one donor. The majority of the phenotype in he studied donors (27,8±1,53%) was CcDe (n=237). CcDEe -19,3±1,35% (n=165); 125 donors have CDe phenotype (14,6±1,2); The frequency of cde was 13,1±1,5%, which means that 112 studied donors belonged to this phenotype group; 87 studied donors had cDEe phenotype characteristics (10,2%); The frequency of cDe was 4,9% (n=42); 19 donors had CDEe phenotype. Other phenotypes (CDE, Cde, CcdEe, Ccde) frequency was very low. Conclusion. Our studied donors are characterized by rather high polymorphism. The Georgian donor’s population is heterogenic, especially high heterogeneity are shown in Rh positive phenotypes. The obtained data is vital importance for the preparation of whole blood or certain blood components for the purpose of their rational usage in blood transfusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biology and Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biology and Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46300/91011.2021.15.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biology and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46300/91011.2021.15.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究材料和方法。852名格鲁吉亚自愿献血者接受了红细胞群抗原的分型。研究材料取自巴统保健中心(格鲁吉亚共和国)诊断实验室。采用单克隆抗- ab、- b、- a、A1、- a2 (H)、-c、-c、- D、-e、-e (Bio-Rad、cypress diagnostics)抗体的免疫血清学方法进行分型。同时还采用ABO/D +反向分组(Bio-Rad)等身份证进行红细胞抗原分型。结果。Rh系统抗原在研究组的患病率如下:e抗原- 94.6%,c抗原-85%,c -68,03, e抗原- 38,07%。大多数(84%)供者为rh阳性(n=719), 133(16%)供者为rh阴性。C抗原最常见的是与D抗原结合。65.8%的供体为CD+组合(n=561)。E抗原在大多数情况下表现为与D抗原的结合。36.9%的供者(306例)有ED+联合。在被研究的供者中,有相当一部分人患有乳糜泻(2,23%;n=19)和ED - (1,17%;n = 9)组合。我们研究了Rh表型在献血者中的患病率。根据RHD、RHC和RHE基因位点,理论上有18个可能的表型组。其中一半(9个)为rh阳性,其余为rh阴性。rh阳性表型为:CDE;CDEe;CDe;CcDE;CcDEe;CcDe;ccDE;cDEe和cDe。rh阴性表型为CdE;CdEe;Cde;CcdE;CcdEe;Ccde;cdE;cdEe;cde。我们在研究的供体中分配了17种Rh表型。只有一种属于Rh阴性组的表型CdE在研究供体中不存在。其他17种表型表现出不同的频率。有的只在一个病例中出现,如cdEe、cdE、cdEe表型只有一个供体。本研究供者的主要表型(27.8±1.53%)为CcDe (n=237)。CcDEe -19,3±1,35% (n=165);125例供体有CDe表型(14.6±1,2);cde的发生率为13.1±1.5%,即112例供体属于该表型组;87名研究供体具有cDEe表型特征(10.2%);cDe发生率为4.9% (n=42);19名供体有CDEe表型。其他表型(CDE、CDE、CcdEe、Ccde)发生率极低。结论。我们研究的供体具有相当高的多态性。格鲁吉亚供体人群是异质的,特别是Rh阳性表型显示出高度异质性。所得数据对全血或某些血液成分的制备及其在输血中的合理使用具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Features of Antigen Prevalence of Rhesus System in Donor Population
Research materials and methods. 852 voluntary Georgian blood donors have been typed on red blood cells group antigens. The research materials have taken from the diagnostic laboratory of Health Centre of Batumi (Georgia republic). The immunoserological methods with monoclonal anti –AB, -B, -A, A1, -A2 (H), -C, -c, - D, -E, -e (Bio-Rad, cypress diagnostics) antibodies was used for typing blood. The ID cards, such as ABO/D + Reverse Grouping (Bio-Rad) were also used for typing of erythrocyte antigens. Result. Prevalence of Rh system antigens in the studied group is looks like so: e antigens – 94,6%, c antigens -85%, C-68,03, E antigens - 38,07%. The majority (84%) of the studied donors are Rh-positive (n=719), 133 (16%) donors are Rh-negative. C antigen most common is present in the combination with D antigen. 65, 8 % case donors had CD+ combination (n=561). E antigen in most cases is presented with a combination of D antigen. 36, 9% of the studied donors (n=306) had ED+ combination. A miserable number of studied donors had CD - (2,23%; n=19) and ED - (1,17%; n=9) combinations. We have studied the Rh phenotypes prevalence in blood donors. According to RHD, RHC, and RHE gene loci, there are 18 theoretically possible phenotypical groups. Among them half (nine) are Rh-positive and the rest of them are Rh-negative. The Rh-positive phenotypes are: CDE; CDEe; CDe; CcDE; CcDEe; CcDe; ccDE; cDEe and cDe. Rh-negative phenotypes are CdE; CdEe; Cde; CcdE; CcdEe; Ccde; cdE; cdEe; cde. We allocated 17 Rh phenotypes among studied donors. Only one phenotype CdE, which belongs to Rh negative group, was not present in studied donors. Other 17 phenotypes showed different frequencies. Some of them were only in a single case, for example, cdEe, cdE, CdEe phenotypes had only one donor. The majority of the phenotype in he studied donors (27,8±1,53%) was CcDe (n=237). CcDEe -19,3±1,35% (n=165); 125 donors have CDe phenotype (14,6±1,2); The frequency of cde was 13,1±1,5%, which means that 112 studied donors belonged to this phenotype group; 87 studied donors had cDEe phenotype characteristics (10,2%); The frequency of cDe was 4,9% (n=42); 19 donors had CDEe phenotype. Other phenotypes (CDE, Cde, CcdEe, Ccde) frequency was very low. Conclusion. Our studied donors are characterized by rather high polymorphism. The Georgian donor’s population is heterogenic, especially high heterogeneity are shown in Rh positive phenotypes. The obtained data is vital importance for the preparation of whole blood or certain blood components for the purpose of their rational usage in blood transfusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Biology and Biomedical Engineering
International Journal of Biology and Biomedical Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Topics: Molecular Dynamics, Biochemistry, Biophysics, Quantum Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Immunology, Neurophysiology, Genetics, Population Dynamics, Dynamics of Diseases, Bioecology, Epidemiology, Social Dynamics, PhotoBiology, PhotoChemistry, Plant Biology, Microbiology, Immunology, Bioinformatics, Signal Transduction, Environmental Systems, Psychological and Cognitive Systems, Pattern Formation, Evolution, Game Theory and Adaptive Dynamics, Bioengineering, Biotechnolgies, Medical Imaging, Medical Signal Processing, Feedback Control in Biology and Chemistry, Fluid Mechanics and Applications in Biomedicine, Space Medicine and Biology, Nuclear Biology and Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Health Communication, Knowledge and Practice towards Prostate cancer in Kwara State, Nigeria Effect of Oil and Selenium as Feed Supplement on Nutritional Content, Fatty Acid Profile, Cholesterol and Protein Productive Value in Nile Tilapia Meat Brain Tumor Classification Using Deep CNN-Based Transfer Learning Approach Early Detection of Crop Disease With Automatic Image Based Classification Using CNN and Trans-fer Learning Analysis of Bioactive Content of White Turmeric Rhizome (Kaempferia rotunda) Growing In Central Kalimantan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1