简·奥斯汀《爱玛》中没有昆虫的生活:横向阅读

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE COLLEGE LITERATURE Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1353/lit.2022.0022
E. Wallace
{"title":"简·奥斯汀《爱玛》中没有昆虫的生活:横向阅读","authors":"E. Wallace","doi":"10.1353/lit.2022.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:What happens when we read an Austen novel \"horizontally\"—that is, in opposition to the vertical framing established by the author? This essay answers this question by examining the case of absent insects in Austen's Emma. After a review of how a traditional, humanistic reading of the novel unfolds, the essay proposes an alternative view to explore how the novel has omitted vital biological agents and processes in favor of a particular androcentric viewpoint, one in which humans not only reign supreme, but also display a high degree of separation from and imperviousness to the natural world. The essay argues that, in the wake of Covid 19, this mythic (if highly pleasurable) view of the human warrants critical reexamination. Thus, while the essay demonstrates an alternative reading practice to a canonical text, it also proposes new, biologically informed approaches to teaching such texts in the literature classroom. In other words, it suggests that literary study has much to gain from newer biological definition of that it means to be human.","PeriodicalId":44728,"journal":{"name":"COLLEGE LITERATURE","volume":"49 1","pages":"599 - 627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Living without Insects in Jane Austen's Emma: A Horizontal Reading\",\"authors\":\"E. Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/lit.2022.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:What happens when we read an Austen novel \\\"horizontally\\\"—that is, in opposition to the vertical framing established by the author? This essay answers this question by examining the case of absent insects in Austen's Emma. After a review of how a traditional, humanistic reading of the novel unfolds, the essay proposes an alternative view to explore how the novel has omitted vital biological agents and processes in favor of a particular androcentric viewpoint, one in which humans not only reign supreme, but also display a high degree of separation from and imperviousness to the natural world. The essay argues that, in the wake of Covid 19, this mythic (if highly pleasurable) view of the human warrants critical reexamination. Thus, while the essay demonstrates an alternative reading practice to a canonical text, it also proposes new, biologically informed approaches to teaching such texts in the literature classroom. In other words, it suggests that literary study has much to gain from newer biological definition of that it means to be human.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COLLEGE LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"599 - 627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COLLEGE LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2022.0022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COLLEGE LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2022.0022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:当我们“横向”阅读奥斯汀的小说时,即与作者建立的垂直框架相反,会发生什么?本文通过考察奥斯汀小说《爱玛》中缺失的昆虫来回答这个问题。在回顾了传统的、人文主义的小说解读之后,本文提出了另一种观点,探讨小说是如何忽略了重要的生物媒介和过程,而倾向于一种特殊的男性中心主义观点,在这种观点中,人类不仅是至高无上的,而且表现出与自然世界的高度分离和不渗透。这篇文章认为,在2019冠状病毒病之后,这种关于人类的神话(如果非常令人愉快)的观点值得批判性地重新审视。因此,虽然这篇文章展示了一种替代经典文本的阅读实践,但它也提出了在文学课堂上教授这些文本的新的、生物学的方法。换句话说,这表明文学研究可以从更新的生物学定义中获益良多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Living without Insects in Jane Austen's Emma: A Horizontal Reading
Abstract:What happens when we read an Austen novel "horizontally"—that is, in opposition to the vertical framing established by the author? This essay answers this question by examining the case of absent insects in Austen's Emma. After a review of how a traditional, humanistic reading of the novel unfolds, the essay proposes an alternative view to explore how the novel has omitted vital biological agents and processes in favor of a particular androcentric viewpoint, one in which humans not only reign supreme, but also display a high degree of separation from and imperviousness to the natural world. The essay argues that, in the wake of Covid 19, this mythic (if highly pleasurable) view of the human warrants critical reexamination. Thus, while the essay demonstrates an alternative reading practice to a canonical text, it also proposes new, biologically informed approaches to teaching such texts in the literature classroom. In other words, it suggests that literary study has much to gain from newer biological definition of that it means to be human.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COLLEGE LITERATURE
COLLEGE LITERATURE LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Science, Michel Serres, and the Topological Poetics of A. R. Ammons Literature and Professional Society: Modernism, Aesthetics, and Ian McEwan's Saturday Academic and Conversational Genre: Revisionist Visions of Anti-Racist Rhetoric in Claudia Rankine's Just Us The Twentieth-Century Adaptation of the Captivity Narrative and the Act of Looking in Elmore Leonard's Western Stories Hanif Kureishi's Passages of Queerness: Diasporic Sensualities and the Creation of Selves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1