网络战与自主自卫

Francis Grimal, J. Sundaram
{"title":"网络战与自主自卫","authors":"Francis Grimal, J. Sundaram","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2017.1338877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT At the forefront of the academic scrutiny of cyberspace within the jus ad bellum context is the extent to which cyber operations fall within the paradigm of Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter. A related question is whether or not the injury suffered by a state subjected to a cyber-attack would be sufficient to invoke its inherent right of self-defence. This article considers the natural technological trajectory of self-defence in cyber operations by examining the very real possibility that computer networks eventually may be enabled to seek to defend themselves automatically against more aggressive cyber intrusions (‘automated cyber self-defence’). This possibility necessitates an examination of the way and extent to which such actions would fall within the existing jus ad bellum framework regulating a defensive response. More controversially, the article will also assert that the temporal parameters of self-defence in response to a cyber-attack may need re-calibration: issues of detection (particularly against dormant malware) and attribution may prevent a state from responding in a more conventional timeframe.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"4 1","pages":"312 - 343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20531702.2017.1338877","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyber warfare and autonomous self-defence\",\"authors\":\"Francis Grimal, J. Sundaram\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20531702.2017.1338877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT At the forefront of the academic scrutiny of cyberspace within the jus ad bellum context is the extent to which cyber operations fall within the paradigm of Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter. A related question is whether or not the injury suffered by a state subjected to a cyber-attack would be sufficient to invoke its inherent right of self-defence. This article considers the natural technological trajectory of self-defence in cyber operations by examining the very real possibility that computer networks eventually may be enabled to seek to defend themselves automatically against more aggressive cyber intrusions (‘automated cyber self-defence’). This possibility necessitates an examination of the way and extent to which such actions would fall within the existing jus ad bellum framework regulating a defensive response. More controversially, the article will also assert that the temporal parameters of self-defence in response to a cyber-attack may need re-calibration: issues of detection (particularly against dormant malware) and attribution may prevent a state from responding in a more conventional timeframe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"312 - 343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20531702.2017.1338877\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2017.1338877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2017.1338877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:在《联合国宪章》第二条第(四)款的范围内,网络行动在多大程度上属于战争法背景下的网络空间学术审查的前沿。一个相关的问题是,一个国家遭受网络攻击所遭受的伤害是否足以援引其固有的自卫权。本文通过研究计算机网络最终可能寻求自动防御更具攻击性的网络入侵(“自动网络自卫”)的真实可能性,考虑了网络行动中自卫的自然技术轨迹。这种可能性需要审查这种行动在多大程度上属于规范防御性反应的现有战争法框架。更有争议的是,这篇文章还断言,应对网络攻击的自卫时间参数可能需要重新校准:检测问题(尤其是针对休眠恶意软件)和归因问题可能会阻止一个国家在更传统的时间范围内做出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cyber warfare and autonomous self-defence
ABSTRACT At the forefront of the academic scrutiny of cyberspace within the jus ad bellum context is the extent to which cyber operations fall within the paradigm of Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter. A related question is whether or not the injury suffered by a state subjected to a cyber-attack would be sufficient to invoke its inherent right of self-defence. This article considers the natural technological trajectory of self-defence in cyber operations by examining the very real possibility that computer networks eventually may be enabled to seek to defend themselves automatically against more aggressive cyber intrusions (‘automated cyber self-defence’). This possibility necessitates an examination of the way and extent to which such actions would fall within the existing jus ad bellum framework regulating a defensive response. More controversially, the article will also assert that the temporal parameters of self-defence in response to a cyber-attack may need re-calibration: issues of detection (particularly against dormant malware) and attribution may prevent a state from responding in a more conventional timeframe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Quashing protests abroad: The CSTO’s intervention in Kazakhstan Intervention by invitation and the scope of state consent Anticipatory consent to military intervention: analysis in the wake of the coup d’état in Niger in 2023 The war in Ukraine and legal limitations on Russian vetoes Digest of state practice: 1 January – 30 June 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1