在游戏中寻找Greybards;或者,为什么切斯特顿隐藏了他那些爱开玩笑的圣人?

Q3 Arts and Humanities Journal of Inklings Studies Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.3366/ink.2022.0133
Daniel Gabelman
{"title":"在游戏中寻找Greybards;或者,为什么切斯特顿隐藏了他那些爱开玩笑的圣人?","authors":"Daniel Gabelman","doi":"10.3366/ink.2022.0133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following Chesterton’s strange omission of his first book in his Autobiography, scholarship has remained virtually silent on Greybeards at Play (1900). When critics have commented, they have generally dismissed the book as silly and disconnected from Chesterton’s subsequent works. This article seeks to invert this perspective, arguing that, far from peripheral or irrelevant, Greybeards is in fact central and seminal in Chesterton’s oeuvre. This is accomplished by exploring the multivalent trope of the greybeard at play and its literary and theological ramifications: how it symbolically unites innocence and experience into a higher childlike state. These greybeards are traced through close readings of the cover art, title, and two framing poems and linked to antecedents in the Bible, Shakespeare, Blake, Dickens, and George MacDonald. At the same time, frequent references to Chesterton’s more popular works gesture to how this symbolic perspective was not an aberration of this one text but emblematic of Chesterton’s mode more generally. The search for greybeards at play thus provides a vital re-evaluation of Chesterton’s first book that suggests it should not only be redeemed from the critical dust-heap but even elevated to a place of primacy in Chesterton’s corpus.","PeriodicalId":37069,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inklings Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Search of Greybeards at Play; or, Why Did Chesterton Conceal His Jesting Sages?\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Gabelman\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/ink.2022.0133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following Chesterton’s strange omission of his first book in his Autobiography, scholarship has remained virtually silent on Greybeards at Play (1900). When critics have commented, they have generally dismissed the book as silly and disconnected from Chesterton’s subsequent works. This article seeks to invert this perspective, arguing that, far from peripheral or irrelevant, Greybeards is in fact central and seminal in Chesterton’s oeuvre. This is accomplished by exploring the multivalent trope of the greybeard at play and its literary and theological ramifications: how it symbolically unites innocence and experience into a higher childlike state. These greybeards are traced through close readings of the cover art, title, and two framing poems and linked to antecedents in the Bible, Shakespeare, Blake, Dickens, and George MacDonald. At the same time, frequent references to Chesterton’s more popular works gesture to how this symbolic perspective was not an aberration of this one text but emblematic of Chesterton’s mode more generally. The search for greybeards at play thus provides a vital re-evaluation of Chesterton’s first book that suggests it should not only be redeemed from the critical dust-heap but even elevated to a place of primacy in Chesterton’s corpus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Inklings Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Inklings Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/ink.2022.0133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inklings Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ink.2022.0133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

切斯特顿在他的自传中奇怪地省略了他的第一本书之后,学术界对《游戏中的格雷伯德》(1900)几乎保持沉默。当评论家们发表评论时,他们通常认为这本书很愚蠢,与切斯特顿后来的作品脱节。这篇文章试图推翻这一观点,认为格雷伯德在切斯特顿的作品中是核心和开创性的,而不是边缘或无关的。这是通过探索灰胡子的多价比喻及其文学和神学影响来实现的:它如何象征性地将天真和经验结合到一种更高的童真状态中。这些灰胡子是通过仔细阅读封面艺术、标题和两首框架诗来追踪的,并与《圣经》、莎士比亚、布莱克、狄更斯和乔治·麦克唐纳的祖先联系在一起。同时,频繁提及切斯特顿更受欢迎的作品表明,这种象征性的视角并不是这一文本的失常,而是切斯特顿模式的象征。因此,对灰胡子的搜索为切斯特顿的第一本书提供了一个重要的重新评估,这本书不仅应该从批判的灰尘堆中救赎出来,甚至应该在切斯特顿文集中提升到首位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In Search of Greybeards at Play; or, Why Did Chesterton Conceal His Jesting Sages?
Following Chesterton’s strange omission of his first book in his Autobiography, scholarship has remained virtually silent on Greybeards at Play (1900). When critics have commented, they have generally dismissed the book as silly and disconnected from Chesterton’s subsequent works. This article seeks to invert this perspective, arguing that, far from peripheral or irrelevant, Greybeards is in fact central and seminal in Chesterton’s oeuvre. This is accomplished by exploring the multivalent trope of the greybeard at play and its literary and theological ramifications: how it symbolically unites innocence and experience into a higher childlike state. These greybeards are traced through close readings of the cover art, title, and two framing poems and linked to antecedents in the Bible, Shakespeare, Blake, Dickens, and George MacDonald. At the same time, frequent references to Chesterton’s more popular works gesture to how this symbolic perspective was not an aberration of this one text but emblematic of Chesterton’s mode more generally. The search for greybeards at play thus provides a vital re-evaluation of Chesterton’s first book that suggests it should not only be redeemed from the critical dust-heap but even elevated to a place of primacy in Chesterton’s corpus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Inklings Studies
Journal of Inklings Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Holly Ordway, Tolkien’s Faith: A Spiritual Biography James E. Siburt, Myth, Magic, and Power in Tolkien’s Middle-earth: Developing a Model for Understanding Power and Leadership Adam Edward Carnehl, The Artist as Divine Symbol: Chesterton’s Theological Aesthetic Janka Kascakova and David Levente Palatinus (eds), J.R.R. Tolkien in Central Europe: Contexts, Directions, and the Legacy ‘He seems to be at the back of all the stories’: The Subtlety of Narnian Providence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1