{"title":"《年轻的梅拉尼娅:从罗马到耶路撒冷》,伊丽莎白·A·克拉克著(评论)","authors":"Roberto Alciati","doi":"10.1353/earl.2022.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"they each other and the networks in which they circulated, the pagan authors past and present (e.g., Libanius of Antioch) that they esteemed, or not least the biblical writers (the author of the Song of Songs, the Apostle Paul, etc.) who displayed their own artistry. Ludlow concludes with a strong reminder that the virtuosity of these Christian authors served a deeply theological passion to draw their audiences into the creative and salvific economy of the divine Craftsman. I discern few serious flaws in Ludlow’s convincing account. Some of her chapters duplicate earlier published essays and there is invariably the challenge of providing an even flow between them. Chapter Seven on christological use of prosōpopoeia seemed to break the rhythm of discussing the crafting of speeches for women that began in Chapter Six and was resumed in Chapter Eight. In some instances, furthermore, I would have preferred more nuance in Ludlow’s description of the specific emotions that these early Christian writers/preachers were trying to elicit using ekphrasis and prosōpopoeia. Some of these emotions, after all, were quite context-specific, such as when they sought a very particular quality of Christian mercy (not pity-at-a-distance) in response to the poor. There are some incidental typographical and other minor errors: read “Johan” for “Josef” Leemans (40); “Francine” for “Christine” Cardman (124); and “Council of Constantinople, 381” for “Council of “Chalcedon, 381” (206). But these are very minor things. Ludlow’s monograph is a groundbreaking and far-reaching contribution to the ongoing investigation of the rich and diverse literary (and rhetorical) culture of late ancient Christianity. It exhibits her own virtuosity in integrating the unique perspectives of historical theology and cultural history. Hopefully, in her future work, Ludlow will extend precisely this kind of exploration beyond the Cappadocians and John Chrysostom to other representative early Christian littérateurs. Paul M. Blowers, Milligan University","PeriodicalId":44662,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES","volume":"30 1","pages":"465 - 467"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Melania the Younger: From Rome to Jerusalem by Elizabeth A. Clark (review)\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Alciati\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/earl.2022.0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"they each other and the networks in which they circulated, the pagan authors past and present (e.g., Libanius of Antioch) that they esteemed, or not least the biblical writers (the author of the Song of Songs, the Apostle Paul, etc.) who displayed their own artistry. Ludlow concludes with a strong reminder that the virtuosity of these Christian authors served a deeply theological passion to draw their audiences into the creative and salvific economy of the divine Craftsman. I discern few serious flaws in Ludlow’s convincing account. Some of her chapters duplicate earlier published essays and there is invariably the challenge of providing an even flow between them. Chapter Seven on christological use of prosōpopoeia seemed to break the rhythm of discussing the crafting of speeches for women that began in Chapter Six and was resumed in Chapter Eight. In some instances, furthermore, I would have preferred more nuance in Ludlow’s description of the specific emotions that these early Christian writers/preachers were trying to elicit using ekphrasis and prosōpopoeia. Some of these emotions, after all, were quite context-specific, such as when they sought a very particular quality of Christian mercy (not pity-at-a-distance) in response to the poor. There are some incidental typographical and other minor errors: read “Johan” for “Josef” Leemans (40); “Francine” for “Christine” Cardman (124); and “Council of Constantinople, 381” for “Council of “Chalcedon, 381” (206). But these are very minor things. Ludlow’s monograph is a groundbreaking and far-reaching contribution to the ongoing investigation of the rich and diverse literary (and rhetorical) culture of late ancient Christianity. It exhibits her own virtuosity in integrating the unique perspectives of historical theology and cultural history. Hopefully, in her future work, Ludlow will extend precisely this kind of exploration beyond the Cappadocians and John Chrysostom to other representative early Christian littérateurs. Paul M. Blowers, Milligan University\",\"PeriodicalId\":44662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"465 - 467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2022.0029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2022.0029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Melania the Younger: From Rome to Jerusalem by Elizabeth A. Clark (review)
they each other and the networks in which they circulated, the pagan authors past and present (e.g., Libanius of Antioch) that they esteemed, or not least the biblical writers (the author of the Song of Songs, the Apostle Paul, etc.) who displayed their own artistry. Ludlow concludes with a strong reminder that the virtuosity of these Christian authors served a deeply theological passion to draw their audiences into the creative and salvific economy of the divine Craftsman. I discern few serious flaws in Ludlow’s convincing account. Some of her chapters duplicate earlier published essays and there is invariably the challenge of providing an even flow between them. Chapter Seven on christological use of prosōpopoeia seemed to break the rhythm of discussing the crafting of speeches for women that began in Chapter Six and was resumed in Chapter Eight. In some instances, furthermore, I would have preferred more nuance in Ludlow’s description of the specific emotions that these early Christian writers/preachers were trying to elicit using ekphrasis and prosōpopoeia. Some of these emotions, after all, were quite context-specific, such as when they sought a very particular quality of Christian mercy (not pity-at-a-distance) in response to the poor. There are some incidental typographical and other minor errors: read “Johan” for “Josef” Leemans (40); “Francine” for “Christine” Cardman (124); and “Council of Constantinople, 381” for “Council of “Chalcedon, 381” (206). But these are very minor things. Ludlow’s monograph is a groundbreaking and far-reaching contribution to the ongoing investigation of the rich and diverse literary (and rhetorical) culture of late ancient Christianity. It exhibits her own virtuosity in integrating the unique perspectives of historical theology and cultural history. Hopefully, in her future work, Ludlow will extend precisely this kind of exploration beyond the Cappadocians and John Chrysostom to other representative early Christian littérateurs. Paul M. Blowers, Milligan University
期刊介绍:
The official publication of the North American Patristics Society (NAPS), the Journal of Early Christian Studies focuses on the study of Christianity in the context of late ancient societies and religions from c.e. 100-700. Incorporating The Second Century (an earlier publication), the Journal publishes the best of traditional patristics scholarship while showcasing articles that call attention to newer themes and methodologies than those appearing in other patristics journals. An extensive book review section is featured in every issue.