Haibo Yan , Jing Tian , Deshui Yu , Jian Di , Jiahao Li , Zhuoyu Liu
{"title":"凌翔地区脑角铁矿热液成因:原位LA-ICP-MS磁铁矿微量元素分析证据","authors":"Haibo Yan , Jing Tian , Deshui Yu , Jian Di , Jiahao Li , Zhuoyu Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.sesci.2021.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Naojiao Fe deposit (Lingxiang district of Daye orefield) in Eastern China is closely associated with the Early Cretaceous Lingxiang diorite intrusion. However, the metallogenic origin of the Fe deposit and its possible magmatic link remains controversial. Here, we present microstructural and trace element features of magnetite grains from the ore-related diorite (type 1), orebodies (type 2), and the orebody-wallrock contact (type 3) at Naojiao. Type 1 magnetite grains have primary automorphic texture, and high P, V, Cr, Ni, and Ga contents but low Mg and Al contents. However, both type 2 and 3 magnetite grains display alteration zoning and oscillatory zoning, and have high Mg, Al, Zn, Zn/V, Co/Ni, Ti/V, and Ni/Cr, but low V, Cr, Ni, and Ga contents. Based the multi-element variation plots, and (Ca+Al+Mn) vs. (Ti+V), Ti vs. Ni/Cr, and (Ti+V) vs. (Al+Mn) discrimination plots, type 1 magnetite could be magmatic and underwent metasomatism, and was formed under relatively high temperature (>500 °C). Type 2 and 3 magnetite grains may have been hydrothermal and closely associated with relatively oxidizing fluids, and formed under relatively low temperature (300–500 °C). Type 3 has wider range of trace element contents, and may have undergone late-stage alteration. Moreover, the Naojiao Fe deposit has similar magnetite microstructures and trace element contents, pyrite δ<sup>34</sup>S values, and mineralization ages to other skarn deposits in the Daye orefield, and further suggests that it is a skarn deposit.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54172,"journal":{"name":"Solid Earth Sciences","volume":"6 3","pages":"Pages 268-282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.sesci.2021.06.004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrothermal origin of the Naojiao Fe deposit in Lingxiang district, Eastern China: Evidence from in-situ LA-ICP-MS magnetite trace element analysis\",\"authors\":\"Haibo Yan , Jing Tian , Deshui Yu , Jian Di , Jiahao Li , Zhuoyu Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sesci.2021.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Naojiao Fe deposit (Lingxiang district of Daye orefield) in Eastern China is closely associated with the Early Cretaceous Lingxiang diorite intrusion. However, the metallogenic origin of the Fe deposit and its possible magmatic link remains controversial. Here, we present microstructural and trace element features of magnetite grains from the ore-related diorite (type 1), orebodies (type 2), and the orebody-wallrock contact (type 3) at Naojiao. Type 1 magnetite grains have primary automorphic texture, and high P, V, Cr, Ni, and Ga contents but low Mg and Al contents. However, both type 2 and 3 magnetite grains display alteration zoning and oscillatory zoning, and have high Mg, Al, Zn, Zn/V, Co/Ni, Ti/V, and Ni/Cr, but low V, Cr, Ni, and Ga contents. Based the multi-element variation plots, and (Ca+Al+Mn) vs. (Ti+V), Ti vs. Ni/Cr, and (Ti+V) vs. (Al+Mn) discrimination plots, type 1 magnetite could be magmatic and underwent metasomatism, and was formed under relatively high temperature (>500 °C). Type 2 and 3 magnetite grains may have been hydrothermal and closely associated with relatively oxidizing fluids, and formed under relatively low temperature (300–500 °C). Type 3 has wider range of trace element contents, and may have undergone late-stage alteration. Moreover, the Naojiao Fe deposit has similar magnetite microstructures and trace element contents, pyrite δ<sup>34</sup>S values, and mineralization ages to other skarn deposits in the Daye orefield, and further suggests that it is a skarn deposit.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solid Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 268-282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.sesci.2021.06.004\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solid Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451912X21000271\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solid Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451912X21000271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
中国东部大冶矿田陵乡地区的直角铁矿床与早白垩世陵乡闪长岩侵入岩密切相关。但对该矿床的成矿成因及其可能的岩浆联系仍有争议。在此基础上,研究了脑角区与矿有关的闪长岩(1型)、矿体(2型)和矿-围岩接触体(3型)中磁铁矿颗粒的显微结构和微量元素特征。1型磁铁矿晶粒具有初生自同构织构,P、V、Cr、Ni、Ga含量高,Mg、Al含量低。2型和3型磁铁矿颗粒均表现为蚀变分带和振荡分带,Mg、Al、Zn、Zn/V、Co/Ni、Ti/V和Ni/Cr含量较高,V、Cr、Ni和Ga含量较低。从多元素变异图、(Ca+Al+Mn) vs (Ti+V)、Ti vs Ni/Cr、(Ti+V) vs (Al+Mn)分辨图来看,1型磁铁矿可能是岩浆形成的,并经历了交代作用,形成温度较高(>500℃)。2型和3型磁铁矿颗粒可能是热液形成的,与相对氧化性流体密切相关,形成温度相对较低(300 ~ 500℃)。3型岩石微量元素含量范围较大,可能发生了后期蚀变。脑角铁矿具有与大冶矿区其他矽卡岩矿床相似的磁铁矿显微结构、微量元素含量、黄铁矿δ34S值、成矿年龄等特征,为矽卡岩矿床。
Hydrothermal origin of the Naojiao Fe deposit in Lingxiang district, Eastern China: Evidence from in-situ LA-ICP-MS magnetite trace element analysis
The Naojiao Fe deposit (Lingxiang district of Daye orefield) in Eastern China is closely associated with the Early Cretaceous Lingxiang diorite intrusion. However, the metallogenic origin of the Fe deposit and its possible magmatic link remains controversial. Here, we present microstructural and trace element features of magnetite grains from the ore-related diorite (type 1), orebodies (type 2), and the orebody-wallrock contact (type 3) at Naojiao. Type 1 magnetite grains have primary automorphic texture, and high P, V, Cr, Ni, and Ga contents but low Mg and Al contents. However, both type 2 and 3 magnetite grains display alteration zoning and oscillatory zoning, and have high Mg, Al, Zn, Zn/V, Co/Ni, Ti/V, and Ni/Cr, but low V, Cr, Ni, and Ga contents. Based the multi-element variation plots, and (Ca+Al+Mn) vs. (Ti+V), Ti vs. Ni/Cr, and (Ti+V) vs. (Al+Mn) discrimination plots, type 1 magnetite could be magmatic and underwent metasomatism, and was formed under relatively high temperature (>500 °C). Type 2 and 3 magnetite grains may have been hydrothermal and closely associated with relatively oxidizing fluids, and formed under relatively low temperature (300–500 °C). Type 3 has wider range of trace element contents, and may have undergone late-stage alteration. Moreover, the Naojiao Fe deposit has similar magnetite microstructures and trace element contents, pyrite δ34S values, and mineralization ages to other skarn deposits in the Daye orefield, and further suggests that it is a skarn deposit.