《乔布斯书》中的Hapax-legomena及其在15-16世纪东斯拉夫圣经中的接受

Q4 Arts and Humanities Slavistica Vilnensis Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.15388/slavviln.2022.67(2).93
A. Kozhinova, Alena Sourkova
{"title":"《乔布斯书》中的Hapax-legomena及其在15-16世纪东斯拉夫圣经中的接受","authors":"A. Kozhinova, Alena Sourkova","doi":"10.15388/slavviln.2022.67(2).93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the lexical correspondences to the Hebrew hapax legomena in the Book of Job, presented in the translation of Job into Ruthenian (prosta(ja) mova) as a part of the Vilnius Old Testament Florilegium (F 19–262) (approx. 1517–1533) and in the Bible by Francis Skoryna (1517–1519). Both versions are compared with the handwritten Church Slavonic Gennadius Bible (1499) and the printed Ostrog Bible (1581). Two Polish bibles — Radziviłł (Brest) Bible (1563) and the Nesvizh Bible (1568–1572) by Symon Budny — are considered as well. Special attention was given to the cases when translations of biblical hapaxes were the result of prescriptive (conditioned by the canonical context and traditional exegesis) activity of translators. In such cases, the knowledge of implicit information that should be verified in the translation was of particular importance. On the other hand, we analyze the translations of unfamiliar words resulting from conjectural variation, when hapaxes were interpreted on the basis of grammatical and syntactic norms and according to the meaning of the context. Not devoid of subjectivity, such variants were often transferred into subsequent translations, turning into dogmatized formulations. During historical development of the original language, the conjectural translation of individual words and entire text fragments partly compensate the translator's lack of the necessary linguistic and extralinguistic information. Thus, while working on the translation of the Book of Job at the end of the 15th–16th centuries, the translators of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania had to solve a number of problems — from searching for their own translations’ versions when interpreting \"dark\" passages to the need to meet those normative guidelines that were dictated by biblical translations, exegetical writings, and other authoritative texts.","PeriodicalId":33056,"journal":{"name":"Slavistica Vilnensis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hapax legomena in the Book of Job and their Reception in East Slavic Bibles of the 15th–16th Centuries\",\"authors\":\"A. Kozhinova, Alena Sourkova\",\"doi\":\"10.15388/slavviln.2022.67(2).93\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the lexical correspondences to the Hebrew hapax legomena in the Book of Job, presented in the translation of Job into Ruthenian (prosta(ja) mova) as a part of the Vilnius Old Testament Florilegium (F 19–262) (approx. 1517–1533) and in the Bible by Francis Skoryna (1517–1519). Both versions are compared with the handwritten Church Slavonic Gennadius Bible (1499) and the printed Ostrog Bible (1581). Two Polish bibles — Radziviłł (Brest) Bible (1563) and the Nesvizh Bible (1568–1572) by Symon Budny — are considered as well. Special attention was given to the cases when translations of biblical hapaxes were the result of prescriptive (conditioned by the canonical context and traditional exegesis) activity of translators. In such cases, the knowledge of implicit information that should be verified in the translation was of particular importance. On the other hand, we analyze the translations of unfamiliar words resulting from conjectural variation, when hapaxes were interpreted on the basis of grammatical and syntactic norms and according to the meaning of the context. Not devoid of subjectivity, such variants were often transferred into subsequent translations, turning into dogmatized formulations. During historical development of the original language, the conjectural translation of individual words and entire text fragments partly compensate the translator's lack of the necessary linguistic and extralinguistic information. Thus, while working on the translation of the Book of Job at the end of the 15th–16th centuries, the translators of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania had to solve a number of problems — from searching for their own translations’ versions when interpreting \\\"dark\\\" passages to the need to meet those normative guidelines that were dictated by biblical translations, exegetical writings, and other authoritative texts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Slavistica Vilnensis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Slavistica Vilnensis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15388/slavviln.2022.67(2).93\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slavistica Vilnensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/slavviln.2022.67(2).93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章讨论了《作业书》中希伯来语hapax legomena的词汇对应关系,《作业》翻译成鲁塞尼亚语(prosta(ja)mova)是《维尔纽斯旧约》Florilegium(F 19-262)(约1517-1533)的一部分,弗朗西斯·斯科里纳(1517-1519)在《圣经》中也提到了这一点。这两个版本都与手写的教会斯拉夫语Gennadius圣经(1499年)和印刷的Ostrog圣经(1581年)进行了比较。两本波兰圣经——《拉德齐维乌(布列斯特)圣经》(1563年)和西蒙·布德尼的《奈斯维日圣经》(1588-1572年)——也被认为是如此。特别注意的是,圣经hapaxes的翻译是译者规定(受规范语境和传统注释的制约)活动的结果。在这种情况下,应该在翻译中核实的隐含信息的知识尤其重要。另一方面,我们分析了在语法和句法规范的基础上,根据上下文的含义解释hapaxes时,由于推测变化而导致的陌生词的翻译。这种变体并非缺乏主观性,经常被转移到后来的翻译中,变成教条主义的表述。在原始语言的历史发展过程中,对单个单词和整个文本片段的推测性翻译在一定程度上弥补了译者缺乏必要的语言和语言外信息的不足。因此,在15-16世纪末翻译《作业书》时,立陶宛大公国的译者必须解决许多问题——从在翻译“黑暗”段落时寻找自己的译本,到需要满足圣经翻译、训诫著作、,以及其他权威文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hapax legomena in the Book of Job and their Reception in East Slavic Bibles of the 15th–16th Centuries
The article deals with the lexical correspondences to the Hebrew hapax legomena in the Book of Job, presented in the translation of Job into Ruthenian (prosta(ja) mova) as a part of the Vilnius Old Testament Florilegium (F 19–262) (approx. 1517–1533) and in the Bible by Francis Skoryna (1517–1519). Both versions are compared with the handwritten Church Slavonic Gennadius Bible (1499) and the printed Ostrog Bible (1581). Two Polish bibles — Radziviłł (Brest) Bible (1563) and the Nesvizh Bible (1568–1572) by Symon Budny — are considered as well. Special attention was given to the cases when translations of biblical hapaxes were the result of prescriptive (conditioned by the canonical context and traditional exegesis) activity of translators. In such cases, the knowledge of implicit information that should be verified in the translation was of particular importance. On the other hand, we analyze the translations of unfamiliar words resulting from conjectural variation, when hapaxes were interpreted on the basis of grammatical and syntactic norms and according to the meaning of the context. Not devoid of subjectivity, such variants were often transferred into subsequent translations, turning into dogmatized formulations. During historical development of the original language, the conjectural translation of individual words and entire text fragments partly compensate the translator's lack of the necessary linguistic and extralinguistic information. Thus, while working on the translation of the Book of Job at the end of the 15th–16th centuries, the translators of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania had to solve a number of problems — from searching for their own translations’ versions when interpreting "dark" passages to the need to meet those normative guidelines that were dictated by biblical translations, exegetical writings, and other authoritative texts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Slavistica Vilnensis
Slavistica Vilnensis Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Macarius: HTR modelis senoms slaviškoms spausdintoms knygoms iš Rumunijos Crow and Raven in Lithuanian and Slavic Phraseology and Ethnic Culture To the 95th anniversary of Doctor of Philology, Professor Adam Evgenievich Suprun „Aš myliu ir gerbiu visą Čekijos tautą“. Elzės Ožeškienės čekofilinės veiklos pėdsakai, pagrįsti laiškais Edvardui Jelinekui Investigating the Sources of the French Grammar (1724) by Ivan Gorlitsky
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1