拟分解性的区间和机制解释

Q3 Arts and Humanities Quaderns de Filosofia Pub Date : 2019-05-24 DOI:10.7203/QFIA.6.1.14822
Emilio Cáceres
{"title":"拟分解性的区间和机制解释","authors":"Emilio Cáceres","doi":"10.7203/QFIA.6.1.14822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: It is commonly assumed that the concept of mechanism is a keytool for the scientific understanding of observable phenomena. However, there is no single definition of mechanism in the current philosophy of science. In fact, philosophers have developed several characterizations of what seemed to be a clear intuitive concept for scientists. In this paper, I will analyze these philosophical conceptions of mechanism, highlighting their problematic aspects and proposing a new mechanistic approach based on the idea that the pertinent levels of organization for a mechanistic explanation can be identified with intervals of quasi-decompositionality. I argue that this approach allows us to consider that activities are directly derived from the entities’ structure. Consequently, a mechanistic explanation implies an arbitrary but not capricious choice of an organizational level. According to this approach, inter-level causation is merely apparent and there is no place for emergent properties. Keywords: mechanisms, emergent properties, quasi-decompositionality, systems.","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intervals of quasi-decompositionality and mechanistic explanations\",\"authors\":\"Emilio Cáceres\",\"doi\":\"10.7203/QFIA.6.1.14822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: It is commonly assumed that the concept of mechanism is a keytool for the scientific understanding of observable phenomena. However, there is no single definition of mechanism in the current philosophy of science. In fact, philosophers have developed several characterizations of what seemed to be a clear intuitive concept for scientists. In this paper, I will analyze these philosophical conceptions of mechanism, highlighting their problematic aspects and proposing a new mechanistic approach based on the idea that the pertinent levels of organization for a mechanistic explanation can be identified with intervals of quasi-decompositionality. I argue that this approach allows us to consider that activities are directly derived from the entities’ structure. Consequently, a mechanistic explanation implies an arbitrary but not capricious choice of an organizational level. According to this approach, inter-level causation is merely apparent and there is no place for emergent properties. Keywords: mechanisms, emergent properties, quasi-decompositionality, systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaderns de Filosofia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaderns de Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7203/QFIA.6.1.14822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaderns de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/QFIA.6.1.14822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:人们普遍认为,机制概念是科学理解可观测现象的关键工具。然而,在目前的科学哲学中,机制并没有一个统一的定义。事实上,对于科学家来说,哲学家们已经对这个似乎是清晰直观的概念进行了几种描述。在本文中,我将分析这些机制的哲学概念,突出它们的问题方面,并提出一种新的机制方法,该方法基于这样一种思想,即机制解释的相关组织水平可以用准分解性的间隔来识别。我认为,这种方法允许我们考虑活动直接派生自实体的结构。因此,机械论的解释意味着对组织层次的任意而非反复无常的选择。根据这种方法,层次间的因果关系仅仅是明显的,没有出现属性的地方。关键词:机制,涌现性质,准分解性,系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intervals of quasi-decompositionality and mechanistic explanations
Abstract: It is commonly assumed that the concept of mechanism is a keytool for the scientific understanding of observable phenomena. However, there is no single definition of mechanism in the current philosophy of science. In fact, philosophers have developed several characterizations of what seemed to be a clear intuitive concept for scientists. In this paper, I will analyze these philosophical conceptions of mechanism, highlighting their problematic aspects and proposing a new mechanistic approach based on the idea that the pertinent levels of organization for a mechanistic explanation can be identified with intervals of quasi-decompositionality. I argue that this approach allows us to consider that activities are directly derived from the entities’ structure. Consequently, a mechanistic explanation implies an arbitrary but not capricious choice of an organizational level. According to this approach, inter-level causation is merely apparent and there is no place for emergent properties. Keywords: mechanisms, emergent properties, quasi-decompositionality, systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Deliberative Mini-Publics as a Democratic Alternative: The Normative Desirability, Technical Feasibility, and Political Viability of Sortition Runners. Una etnografía en una plataforma de entrenamiento de Nike, por Nemesia Hijós. Soberanía digital: un debate abierto y tres problemas políticos (Pos)verdad y política en la democracia liberal Good Anxiety: Harnessing the Power of the Most Misunderstood Emotion, by Wendy Suzuki
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1