食品生产技术信息是否影响消费者对生物强化食品的接受?肯尼亚野外实验的证据

J. Okello, C. Lagerkvist, P. Muoki, S. Heck, G. Prain
{"title":"食品生产技术信息是否影响消费者对生物强化食品的接受?肯尼亚野外实验的证据","authors":"J. Okello, C. Lagerkvist, P. Muoki, S. Heck, G. Prain","doi":"10.1080/10496505.2017.1383914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study used a field experiment and the means-end chain approach to examine the effect of providing information on the biofortification process on consumers' acceptance of orange-fleshed sweetpotato (OFSP). Negative, positive, and neutral information about the biofortification were verbally provided. Images were used to reinforce the verbal information. Meaning representation (mental models) of various constructs relating to OFSP was assessed. We found that the structure of mental constructs differed depending on the type of information provided and concluded that the type of information consumers receive about the biofortification process affects OFSP acceptance. Implications of the findings for policy and development practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":43986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information","volume":"19 1","pages":"237 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10496505.2017.1383914","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Information on Food Production Technology Affect Consumers' Acceptance of Biofortified Foods? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya\",\"authors\":\"J. Okello, C. Lagerkvist, P. Muoki, S. Heck, G. Prain\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10496505.2017.1383914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study used a field experiment and the means-end chain approach to examine the effect of providing information on the biofortification process on consumers' acceptance of orange-fleshed sweetpotato (OFSP). Negative, positive, and neutral information about the biofortification were verbally provided. Images were used to reinforce the verbal information. Meaning representation (mental models) of various constructs relating to OFSP was assessed. We found that the structure of mental constructs differed depending on the type of information provided and concluded that the type of information consumers receive about the biofortification process affects OFSP acceptance. Implications of the findings for policy and development practice are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"237 - 254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10496505.2017.1383914\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2017.1383914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2017.1383914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

摘要本研究采用田间试验和均值-端链方法,检验了提供生物强化过程信息对消费者接受橙肉红薯(OFSP)的影响。口头提供了关于生物强化的负面、正面和中性信息。图像被用来强化口头信息。评估了与OFSP相关的各种结构的意义表征(心理模型)。我们发现,心理结构的结构因所提供信息的类型而异,并得出结论,消费者收到的关于生物强化过程的信息类型会影响OFSP的接受。讨论了研究结果对政策和发展实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Information on Food Production Technology Affect Consumers' Acceptance of Biofortified Foods? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya
ABSTRACT This study used a field experiment and the means-end chain approach to examine the effect of providing information on the biofortification process on consumers' acceptance of orange-fleshed sweetpotato (OFSP). Negative, positive, and neutral information about the biofortification were verbally provided. Images were used to reinforce the verbal information. Meaning representation (mental models) of various constructs relating to OFSP was assessed. We found that the structure of mental constructs differed depending on the type of information provided and concluded that the type of information consumers receive about the biofortification process affects OFSP acceptance. Implications of the findings for policy and development practice are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
The Development of Search Filters for One Health Articles Using CAB Abstracts Descriptors Agriculture-Related Courses in Canadian Universities: How Course Outlines Differ between Social Science and Science Faculties Review of Farming Systems and Food Security in Africa: Priorities for Science and Policy under Global Change Editorial An Analysis of Online Research Guides for Wine, Enology, and Viticulture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1