去脚本化办公室设计:探索使用中的设计意图

IF 2.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Corporate Real Estate Pub Date : 2021-07-05 DOI:10.1108/JCRE-10-2020-0039
E. Søiland
{"title":"去脚本化办公室设计:探索使用中的设计意图","authors":"E. Søiland","doi":"10.1108/JCRE-10-2020-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to explore how users respond to office design through their use of space. Intentions for how office spaces should be used can be not only understood as sociomaterial scripts that are inscribed into the architecture by designers but also communicated through organisational change processes. The paper elaborates on how users de-script office spaces, that is, how they respond to these scripts through use.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper draws on a case study of an office design intervention in a public organisation. Taking a sociomaterial approach, the paper uses the concepts of scripting and de-scripting to analyse the data.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings show that users subscribe to, repair, resist or re-script design scripts. This suggests that users can enact agency in use through creative acts of appropriation. Further, both materiality and user participation play equivocal roles in user responses.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe paper is based on a single case study where the design process was studied retrospectively. The case is regarded as typical of contemporary office design processes, but more studies that follow projects from design into use are needed.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis suggests that design solutions should be better adapted to the work practices instead of applying generic concepts to specific situations and that design and use should be understood as overlapping processes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe originality of this study lies in linking aspects of the design process with user responses and in taking a sociomaterial approach to examine design and use.\n","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De-scripting office design: exploring design intentions in use\",\"authors\":\"E. Søiland\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JCRE-10-2020-0039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to explore how users respond to office design through their use of space. Intentions for how office spaces should be used can be not only understood as sociomaterial scripts that are inscribed into the architecture by designers but also communicated through organisational change processes. The paper elaborates on how users de-script office spaces, that is, how they respond to these scripts through use.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe paper draws on a case study of an office design intervention in a public organisation. Taking a sociomaterial approach, the paper uses the concepts of scripting and de-scripting to analyse the data.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe findings show that users subscribe to, repair, resist or re-script design scripts. This suggests that users can enact agency in use through creative acts of appropriation. Further, both materiality and user participation play equivocal roles in user responses.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe paper is based on a single case study where the design process was studied retrospectively. The case is regarded as typical of contemporary office design processes, but more studies that follow projects from design into use are needed.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis suggests that design solutions should be better adapted to the work practices instead of applying generic concepts to specific situations and that design and use should be understood as overlapping processes.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe originality of this study lies in linking aspects of the design process with user responses and in taking a sociomaterial approach to examine design and use.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Real Estate\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Real Estate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-10-2020-0039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-10-2020-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的本文旨在探讨用户如何通过对空间的使用来回应办公室设计。如何使用办公空间的意图不仅可以理解为设计师刻在建筑中的社会材料脚本,还可以通过组织变革过程进行沟通。本文阐述了用户如何去编写办公空间的脚本,即他们如何通过使用来回应这些脚本。设计/方法论/方法本文借鉴了一个公共组织中办公室设计干预的案例研究。本文采用社会物质方法,使用脚本和反脚本的概念来分析数据。调查结果显示,用户订阅、修复、抵制或重新编写设计脚本。这表明,用户可以通过创造性的挪用行为来制定使用中的代理。此外,实质性和用户参与在用户反应中都扮演着模棱两可的角色。研究局限性/含义本文基于一个案例研究,对设计过程进行了回顾性研究。该案例被认为是当代办公室设计过程的典型案例,但还需要对项目从设计到使用进行更多的研究。实际含义这表明设计解决方案应该更好地适应工作实践,而不是将通用概念应用于特定情况,设计和使用应该被理解为重叠的过程。独创性/价值本研究的独创性在于将设计过程的各个方面与用户的反应联系起来,并采用社会物质方法来检查设计和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
De-scripting office design: exploring design intentions in use
Purpose This paper aims to explore how users respond to office design through their use of space. Intentions for how office spaces should be used can be not only understood as sociomaterial scripts that are inscribed into the architecture by designers but also communicated through organisational change processes. The paper elaborates on how users de-script office spaces, that is, how they respond to these scripts through use. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws on a case study of an office design intervention in a public organisation. Taking a sociomaterial approach, the paper uses the concepts of scripting and de-scripting to analyse the data. Findings The findings show that users subscribe to, repair, resist or re-script design scripts. This suggests that users can enact agency in use through creative acts of appropriation. Further, both materiality and user participation play equivocal roles in user responses. Research limitations/implications The paper is based on a single case study where the design process was studied retrospectively. The case is regarded as typical of contemporary office design processes, but more studies that follow projects from design into use are needed. Practical implications This suggests that design solutions should be better adapted to the work practices instead of applying generic concepts to specific situations and that design and use should be understood as overlapping processes. Originality/value The originality of this study lies in linking aspects of the design process with user responses and in taking a sociomaterial approach to examine design and use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Choosing where to work: an empirical study of collaborative activities’ impact on workspace choice behavior Open-plan office employees’ perceived mental and social well-being A comprehensive analysis of the implications of artificial intelligence adoption on employee social well-being in South African facility management organizations Knowledge work productivity in an activity-based workplace: a comparative analysis The predictive power of prior attitudes: understanding employee workspace satisfaction in activity-based work environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1