各种干粉吸入装置治疗支气管哮喘的疗效评价

A. Verma, Subodh Kumar, A. Pandey, RP Singh, S. Chaudhri, S. Kant, S. Katiyar
{"title":"各种干粉吸入装置治疗支气管哮喘的疗效评价","authors":"A. Verma, Subodh Kumar, A. Pandey, RP Singh, S. Chaudhri, S. Kant, S. Katiyar","doi":"10.4103/jms.jms_5_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy in terms of clinical effectiveness and patients' acceptability regarding the use of dry powder inhaler devices in asthmatic patients. Materials and Methods: Patients with mild-to-moderate asthma were recruited from Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College, Kanpur, India. A total number of patients were divided into three groups and were given different dry powder inhalation devices, randomly Group one-Rotahaler; Group Two-Diskhaler; and Group Three-Transhaler. Spirometry was performed, and the inhalation technique was checked in each follow-up visit. Results: Patients with asthma in all three studied groups improved from the prescribed inhaled steroids, irrespective of the inhalational device. Min Max % as a marker for peak expiratory flow rate variability, improved in all three groups without any significant difference. Predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second percent considered as a marker of asthma severity improved significantly in all patients, but without any significant difference between groups. Conclusion: We conclude that these inhalers, particularly in mild-to-moderate asthma, have comparable efficacy; however, we carried out intensive monitoring and teaching of inhalational technique, which could be the reason behind insignificant difference.","PeriodicalId":39636,"journal":{"name":"JMS - Journal of Medical Society","volume":"37 1","pages":"26 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the efficacy of various dry powder inhalation devices in the treatment of bronchial asthma patients\",\"authors\":\"A. Verma, Subodh Kumar, A. Pandey, RP Singh, S. Chaudhri, S. Kant, S. Katiyar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jms.jms_5_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy in terms of clinical effectiveness and patients' acceptability regarding the use of dry powder inhaler devices in asthmatic patients. Materials and Methods: Patients with mild-to-moderate asthma were recruited from Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College, Kanpur, India. A total number of patients were divided into three groups and were given different dry powder inhalation devices, randomly Group one-Rotahaler; Group Two-Diskhaler; and Group Three-Transhaler. Spirometry was performed, and the inhalation technique was checked in each follow-up visit. Results: Patients with asthma in all three studied groups improved from the prescribed inhaled steroids, irrespective of the inhalational device. Min Max % as a marker for peak expiratory flow rate variability, improved in all three groups without any significant difference. Predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second percent considered as a marker of asthma severity improved significantly in all patients, but without any significant difference between groups. Conclusion: We conclude that these inhalers, particularly in mild-to-moderate asthma, have comparable efficacy; however, we carried out intensive monitoring and teaching of inhalational technique, which could be the reason behind insignificant difference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMS - Journal of Medical Society\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"26 - 30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMS - Journal of Medical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jms.jms_5_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMS - Journal of Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jms.jms_5_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:在目前的研究中,我们旨在评估哮喘患者使用干粉吸入器的临床有效性和患者的可接受性。材料和方法:从印度坎普尔Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi纪念医学院招募轻度至中度哮喘患者。将患者分为三组,给予不同的干粉吸入装置,随机分为第一组Rotahaler;第二组Diskhaler;和第三组Transhaler。进行肺活量测定,并在每次随访中检查吸入技术。结果:在所有三个研究组中,哮喘患者从处方的吸入类固醇中得到改善,无论吸入装置如何。作为呼气峰流速变异性的标志物,三组患者的最小最大百分比均有所改善,无任何显著差异。被认为是哮喘严重程度标志的前百分之1秒的预测用力呼气量在所有患者中都有显著改善,但各组之间没有任何显著差异。结论:我们得出结论,这些吸入器,特别是在轻度至中度哮喘中,具有相当的疗效;然而,我们对吸入技术进行了深入的监测和教学,这可能是差异不显著的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the efficacy of various dry powder inhalation devices in the treatment of bronchial asthma patients
Introduction: In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy in terms of clinical effectiveness and patients' acceptability regarding the use of dry powder inhaler devices in asthmatic patients. Materials and Methods: Patients with mild-to-moderate asthma were recruited from Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College, Kanpur, India. A total number of patients were divided into three groups and were given different dry powder inhalation devices, randomly Group one-Rotahaler; Group Two-Diskhaler; and Group Three-Transhaler. Spirometry was performed, and the inhalation technique was checked in each follow-up visit. Results: Patients with asthma in all three studied groups improved from the prescribed inhaled steroids, irrespective of the inhalational device. Min Max % as a marker for peak expiratory flow rate variability, improved in all three groups without any significant difference. Predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second percent considered as a marker of asthma severity improved significantly in all patients, but without any significant difference between groups. Conclusion: We conclude that these inhalers, particularly in mild-to-moderate asthma, have comparable efficacy; however, we carried out intensive monitoring and teaching of inhalational technique, which could be the reason behind insignificant difference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMS - Journal of Medical Society
JMS - Journal of Medical Society Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dyserythropoiesis: A morphology-based study on bone marrow specimens The management of fatal hyperhemolysis in a sickle cell anemia patient transfused in a remote Island in North Andaman Usefulness of exercise stress test in early diagnosis of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients An investigation into the use of an extended lipid panel in the screening of cardiovascular events Estimation of systemic and mucosal toll-like receptors 4 and 6 in women with breast tumor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1