腐败案件中没收第三人财产的合法性分析

Nur Jannah, M. Khoidin, S. Suhartono
{"title":"腐败案件中没收第三人财产的合法性分析","authors":"Nur Jannah, M. Khoidin, S. Suhartono","doi":"10.51825/nhk.v6i1.19395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the legal confiscation of third-party property in cases of corruption. The research method used is normative or doctrinal, which involves analyzing legal concepts and principles found in court decisions, laws, and statutory regulations. The focus of the research is to examine the legal aspects of confiscating third-party property in corruption cases. The findings reveal that, legally, a third party can submit an objection within a maximum period of 2 months. However, an objection lawsuit can only be filed after the court decision attains permanent legal force, indicating that the court has restricted or diminished the rights of third parties to enjoy or utilize their assets.","PeriodicalId":52601,"journal":{"name":"Nurani Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the Legality of Confiscating Third Party Property in Cases of Corruption\",\"authors\":\"Nur Jannah, M. Khoidin, S. Suhartono\",\"doi\":\"10.51825/nhk.v6i1.19395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the legal confiscation of third-party property in cases of corruption. The research method used is normative or doctrinal, which involves analyzing legal concepts and principles found in court decisions, laws, and statutory regulations. The focus of the research is to examine the legal aspects of confiscating third-party property in corruption cases. The findings reveal that, legally, a third party can submit an objection within a maximum period of 2 months. However, an objection lawsuit can only be filed after the court decision attains permanent legal force, indicating that the court has restricted or diminished the rights of third parties to enjoy or utilize their assets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurani Hukum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurani Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v6i1.19395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurani Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v6i1.19395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了腐败案件中第三方财产的法律没收问题。所使用的研究方法是规范性的或理论性的,包括分析法院判决、法律和法定法规中的法律概念和原则。研究的重点是审查腐败案件中没收第三方财产的法律方面。调查结果表明,从法律上讲,第三方可以在最长2个月内提出异议。然而,只有在法院裁决具有永久法律效力,表明法院限制或削弱了第三方享有或使用其资产的权利后,才能提起异议诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyzing the Legality of Confiscating Third Party Property in Cases of Corruption
This article examines the legal confiscation of third-party property in cases of corruption. The research method used is normative or doctrinal, which involves analyzing legal concepts and principles found in court decisions, laws, and statutory regulations. The focus of the research is to examine the legal aspects of confiscating third-party property in corruption cases. The findings reveal that, legally, a third party can submit an objection within a maximum period of 2 months. However, an objection lawsuit can only be filed after the court decision attains permanent legal force, indicating that the court has restricted or diminished the rights of third parties to enjoy or utilize their assets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bridges, Not Walls: The Role of Migration and International Human Rights Law in Harnessing the Impending Demographic Tsunami Navigating Legal Boundaries: Academic Freedom and Content Restrictions in Turkish Publication Religious Anthropology: Catalyst for Unravelling Discourses and Fostering Profound Understanding in Arab Society through Islamic Law Digital Financial Strategy: New Direction or the Usual Old? Different Gender Priorities Amid EU Labor Laws and Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1