男性对孕妇吸二手烟教育媒体的可读性与适宜性评价

Z. Karimiankakolaki, V. Anoosheh, F. Aliakbari
{"title":"男性对孕妇吸二手烟教育媒体的可读性与适宜性评价","authors":"Z. Karimiankakolaki, V. Anoosheh, F. Aliakbari","doi":"10.18502/jchr.v11i3.10866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The tools for assessing the appropriateness of educational materials are measuring device. Suitability offers a systematic approach to objectively assessing the appropriateness of health information material for a specific audience. The present study is designed to evaluate the readability and suitability of educational media about regarding men's secondhand smoke (SHS) in the smoker men on their the exposure of pregnant wives. \nMethods: This cross sectional study was done from October to December 2018 in Isfahan, Iran. Participants were in two groups. The first group of educational media audience consisted of 20 smokers with a pregnant wife. The second group was 15 people from the panel of experts. Written educational media (pamphlets) were evaluated. The readability of the material was measured by “readability assessment of materials” (RAM) and suitability was retrieved through “suitability assessment materials” (SAM).  The Gunning-Fog Index was used to assess the readability of the media and the cloze test was used to assess the educational level of the media. Descriptive indices were stated for all variables. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS18. \nResults: The readability mean score of the educational material was 16.60±1.34 for pamphlet, which was acceptable (score>10, P=0.000). Results showed the percentage points SAM score for the pamphlet was 85%. The educational material for media was “excellent” on the SAM rating. The score of the Gunning-Fog index for pamphlets was 9.6 and equivalent to the third grade of guidance was obtained. According to the evaluation by cloze test, pamphlet learning was assessed as an independent training without the need for a teacher. \nConclusions: The printed materials were well-matched after evaluation by the RAM and the SAM checklist, the Gunning-Fog Index and the cloze test. They were consistent with the characteristics of smoker men.","PeriodicalId":15521,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Readability and Suitability Evaluation of Educational Media Regarding Men's Secondhand Smoke on Pregnant Wives\",\"authors\":\"Z. Karimiankakolaki, V. Anoosheh, F. Aliakbari\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jchr.v11i3.10866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The tools for assessing the appropriateness of educational materials are measuring device. Suitability offers a systematic approach to objectively assessing the appropriateness of health information material for a specific audience. The present study is designed to evaluate the readability and suitability of educational media about regarding men's secondhand smoke (SHS) in the smoker men on their the exposure of pregnant wives. \\nMethods: This cross sectional study was done from October to December 2018 in Isfahan, Iran. Participants were in two groups. The first group of educational media audience consisted of 20 smokers with a pregnant wife. The second group was 15 people from the panel of experts. Written educational media (pamphlets) were evaluated. The readability of the material was measured by “readability assessment of materials” (RAM) and suitability was retrieved through “suitability assessment materials” (SAM).  The Gunning-Fog Index was used to assess the readability of the media and the cloze test was used to assess the educational level of the media. Descriptive indices were stated for all variables. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS18. \\nResults: The readability mean score of the educational material was 16.60±1.34 for pamphlet, which was acceptable (score>10, P=0.000). Results showed the percentage points SAM score for the pamphlet was 85%. The educational material for media was “excellent” on the SAM rating. The score of the Gunning-Fog index for pamphlets was 9.6 and equivalent to the third grade of guidance was obtained. According to the evaluation by cloze test, pamphlet learning was assessed as an independent training without the need for a teacher. \\nConclusions: The printed materials were well-matched after evaluation by the RAM and the SAM checklist, the Gunning-Fog Index and the cloze test. They were consistent with the characteristics of smoker men.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Health Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jchr.v11i3.10866\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jchr.v11i3.10866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:评估教材适宜性的工具是测量装置。适宜性提供了一种系统的方法,客观地评估卫生信息材料对特定受众的适宜性。本研究旨在评估教育媒体对吸烟男性与孕妇接触二手烟的可读性和适宜性。方法:本横断面研究于2018年10月至12月在伊朗伊斯法罕进行。参与者分为两组。第一组教育媒体观众由20名吸烟者和怀孕的妻子组成。第二组是来自专家小组的15人。评估书面教育媒体(小册子)。通过“材料可读性评估”(RAM)测量材料的可读性,通过“适用性评估材料”(SAM)检索材料的适用性。采用Gunning-Fog指数评价媒体的可读性,采用完形填空测试评价媒体的受教育程度。对所有变量进行描述性指标说明。采集数据采用SPSS18软件进行分析。结果:宣传册的易读性平均得分为16.60±1.34分,可接受(得分bbb10, P=0.000)。结果显示,该小册子的SAM得分为85%。针对媒体的教育材料在SAM评级中为“优秀”。小册子的Gunning-Fog指数得分为9.6,相当于三级指导。根据完形填空测试的评价,小册子学习被评估为不需要教师的独立训练。结论:经RAM和SAM检查表、Gunning-Fog指数和完形测试评价,印刷材料匹配良好。它们与吸烟男性的特征一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Readability and Suitability Evaluation of Educational Media Regarding Men's Secondhand Smoke on Pregnant Wives
Introduction: The tools for assessing the appropriateness of educational materials are measuring device. Suitability offers a systematic approach to objectively assessing the appropriateness of health information material for a specific audience. The present study is designed to evaluate the readability and suitability of educational media about regarding men's secondhand smoke (SHS) in the smoker men on their the exposure of pregnant wives. Methods: This cross sectional study was done from October to December 2018 in Isfahan, Iran. Participants were in two groups. The first group of educational media audience consisted of 20 smokers with a pregnant wife. The second group was 15 people from the panel of experts. Written educational media (pamphlets) were evaluated. The readability of the material was measured by “readability assessment of materials” (RAM) and suitability was retrieved through “suitability assessment materials” (SAM).  The Gunning-Fog Index was used to assess the readability of the media and the cloze test was used to assess the educational level of the media. Descriptive indices were stated for all variables. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS18. Results: The readability mean score of the educational material was 16.60±1.34 for pamphlet, which was acceptable (score>10, P=0.000). Results showed the percentage points SAM score for the pamphlet was 85%. The educational material for media was “excellent” on the SAM rating. The score of the Gunning-Fog index for pamphlets was 9.6 and equivalent to the third grade of guidance was obtained. According to the evaluation by cloze test, pamphlet learning was assessed as an independent training without the need for a teacher. Conclusions: The printed materials were well-matched after evaluation by the RAM and the SAM checklist, the Gunning-Fog Index and the cloze test. They were consistent with the characteristics of smoker men.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of the Intention to Perform Preventive Behaviors Against the Occurrence of Breast Cancer Recognizing and Describing the Factors Affecting the Design of the Innovation Ecosystem Model in the Field of Health with an Emphasis on the Role of E-Government Institutionalization of Sports for All in Iranian Families Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of COVID-19 Preventive Measures Questionnaire in Radiation Therapy Center, Yazd, Iran Survival Analysis of Ovarian Cancer Patients in Yazd City, Central part of Iran, 1999-2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1