不同表现反馈演示对打字准确性和速度影响的比较

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Organizational Behavior Management Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/01608061.2021.1919590
Julieanne K. Guadalupe, Alicia M. Alvero
{"title":"不同表现反馈演示对打字准确性和速度影响的比较","authors":"Julieanne K. Guadalupe, Alicia M. Alvero","doi":"10.1080/01608061.2021.1919590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to examine which combination of performance feedback was most effective to improve typing accuracy and speed. Participants were assigned to one of four groups: (1) no feedback group, (2) performance feedback-alone group, (3) performance feedback and goal group, or (4) performance feedback-with-praise group. In a within-subject design, following a no-feedback condition (baseline), performance feedback was either presented on participants’ accuracy only, speed only, or both accuracy and speed. The results revealed no main effects of performance feedback combination on typing speed or accuracy. However, in all feedback groups, an increase in accuracy and speed scores was observed during conditions when feedback on typing accuracy, speed, or a combination of accuracy and speed was delivered, compared to the no-feedback condition. The results of this study suggest that providing feedback on any component of a participant’s typing performance may be sufficient to improve performance over baseline levels.","PeriodicalId":51667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01608061.2021.1919590","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of the effects of various performance feedback presentations on typing accuracy and speed\",\"authors\":\"Julieanne K. Guadalupe, Alicia M. Alvero\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01608061.2021.1919590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to examine which combination of performance feedback was most effective to improve typing accuracy and speed. Participants were assigned to one of four groups: (1) no feedback group, (2) performance feedback-alone group, (3) performance feedback and goal group, or (4) performance feedback-with-praise group. In a within-subject design, following a no-feedback condition (baseline), performance feedback was either presented on participants’ accuracy only, speed only, or both accuracy and speed. The results revealed no main effects of performance feedback combination on typing speed or accuracy. However, in all feedback groups, an increase in accuracy and speed scores was observed during conditions when feedback on typing accuracy, speed, or a combination of accuracy and speed was delivered, compared to the no-feedback condition. The results of this study suggest that providing feedback on any component of a participant’s typing performance may be sufficient to improve performance over baseline levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01608061.2021.1919590\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2021.1919590\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2021.1919590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是检验哪种绩效反馈组合对提高打字准确性和速度最有效。参与者被分配到四组中的一组:(1)无反馈组,(2)单独的绩效反馈组、(3)绩效反馈和目标组,或(4)绩效反馈加表扬组。在受试者内部设计中,在无反馈条件(基线)下,绩效反馈要么仅针对参与者的准确性,要么仅针对速度,要么同时针对准确性和速度。结果显示,性能反馈组合对打字速度或准确性没有主要影响。然而,在所有反馈组中,与无反馈条件相比,在对打字准确性、速度或准确性和速度的组合进行反馈的条件下,观察到准确性和速度得分增加。这项研究的结果表明,对参与者打字表现的任何组成部分提供反馈可能足以提高基线水平的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of the effects of various performance feedback presentations on typing accuracy and speed
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to examine which combination of performance feedback was most effective to improve typing accuracy and speed. Participants were assigned to one of four groups: (1) no feedback group, (2) performance feedback-alone group, (3) performance feedback and goal group, or (4) performance feedback-with-praise group. In a within-subject design, following a no-feedback condition (baseline), performance feedback was either presented on participants’ accuracy only, speed only, or both accuracy and speed. The results revealed no main effects of performance feedback combination on typing speed or accuracy. However, in all feedback groups, an increase in accuracy and speed scores was observed during conditions when feedback on typing accuracy, speed, or a combination of accuracy and speed was delivered, compared to the no-feedback condition. The results of this study suggest that providing feedback on any component of a participant’s typing performance may be sufficient to improve performance over baseline levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
47.60%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior Management—the official journal of the OBM Network (www.obmnetwork.com)—is a periodical devoted specifically to scientific principles to improve organizational performance through behavioral change. The journal publishes research and review articles, reports from the field, discussions, and book reviews on the topics that are critical to today"s organization development practitioners, operations managers, and human resource professionals.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Relationship Between Evaluation Frequency and Monthly Fidelity Score on Provider Retention: A Longitudinal Study Volume 44 Issue 3 of the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management Behavioral Safety in a Dental Surgery Facility An analysis of research designs in the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management (2000–2022) In Memoriam: Thomas C. Mawhinney: Fortuitous Circumstances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1