{"title":"英语非二元代词态度的主位分析","authors":"Laura Hekanaho","doi":"10.1075/jls.21025.hek","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The article provides a comprehensive overview of attitudes towards nonbinary pronouns, with the aim of better\n understanding why these pronouns are either accepted or rejected. Attitudes towards nonbinary they and the\n neopronouns ze and xe are explored with a thematic analysis of data derived from a larger online\n survey on pronouns (n = 1128). While the results demonstrate various polarized stances for both types of\n pronouns, the participants’ reactions highlight greater acceptance of and support for nonbinary they. In\n addition, the paper proposes that broader ideologies about gender are behind the participants’ overt reactions to nonbinary\n pronouns. Most notably, while some participants rejected the pronouns on the basis of a binary gender ideology, others viewed\n gender as a matter of self-identification, accepting any pronoun an individual chooses for themselves.","PeriodicalId":36680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A thematic analysis of attitudes towards English nonbinary pronouns\",\"authors\":\"Laura Hekanaho\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jls.21025.hek\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The article provides a comprehensive overview of attitudes towards nonbinary pronouns, with the aim of better\\n understanding why these pronouns are either accepted or rejected. Attitudes towards nonbinary they and the\\n neopronouns ze and xe are explored with a thematic analysis of data derived from a larger online\\n survey on pronouns (n = 1128). While the results demonstrate various polarized stances for both types of\\n pronouns, the participants’ reactions highlight greater acceptance of and support for nonbinary they. In\\n addition, the paper proposes that broader ideologies about gender are behind the participants’ overt reactions to nonbinary\\n pronouns. Most notably, while some participants rejected the pronouns on the basis of a binary gender ideology, others viewed\\n gender as a matter of self-identification, accepting any pronoun an individual chooses for themselves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.21025.hek\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.21025.hek","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
A thematic analysis of attitudes towards English nonbinary pronouns
The article provides a comprehensive overview of attitudes towards nonbinary pronouns, with the aim of better
understanding why these pronouns are either accepted or rejected. Attitudes towards nonbinary they and the
neopronouns ze and xe are explored with a thematic analysis of data derived from a larger online
survey on pronouns (n = 1128). While the results demonstrate various polarized stances for both types of
pronouns, the participants’ reactions highlight greater acceptance of and support for nonbinary they. In
addition, the paper proposes that broader ideologies about gender are behind the participants’ overt reactions to nonbinary
pronouns. Most notably, while some participants rejected the pronouns on the basis of a binary gender ideology, others viewed
gender as a matter of self-identification, accepting any pronoun an individual chooses for themselves.