哈拉尔德·泽曼与重返博物馆之路

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 ART Getty Research Journal Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1086/702750
Max Rosenberg
{"title":"哈拉尔德·泽曼与重返博物馆之路","authors":"Max Rosenberg","doi":"10.1086/702750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"107 The Event Form Early indications of what the public could expect at documenta 5 were revealed on the cover of the May/June 1970 issue of Informationen (fig. 1), a seasonal brochure on local culture in and around the city of Kassel, Germany, where the famed quinquennial contemporary art exhibition was established in 1955. In a brief schematic outline, Harald Szeemann (fig. 2), the newly appointed general secretary of documenta 5, along with a few collaborators whom he had selected to help with the organization of the show, gave a brief explanation of the approach to the next Kassel mega-exhibition. Their documenta, as the brochure makes abundantly clear, would distinguish itself from its predecessors by embracing an “event structure” (Ereignisstruktur). More than the proposal itself, a graphic featured above the text illustrated this ambition. In a large black field, “documenta IV” appeared in big white letters, but the “IV” was struck through and a “V” was printed above it. Beneath this, “Museum der 100 Tage” (100-day museum), the traditional length of the exhibition and its de facto tagline, was printed, but only “100 Tage” remained; “Museum der” was struck through and “Ereignis” (event) was added next to and slightly above the previous motto. From “Museum der 100 Tage,” the “100 Tage Ereignis” (100-day event) was born. By depicting the first conceptual proposal for the exhibition in this way, Szeemann and his coorganizers signaled that documenta 5 would constitute an assertive departure from the format and structure of the past exhibitions. Specifically, Szeemann wished to break down the traditional media distinctions and the privileging of painting and sculpture that the previous documentas had maintained. This intention also stemmed from a desire to move away from abstract painting, metonymy for modern art itself in much of the capitalist West (especially West Germany). Documenta had been a primary conduit through which abstraction had achieved broad cultural supremacy. At the first several documentas, the art historian and coorganizer of the shows Werner Haftmann had popularized the idea of abstraction as a “world language” (Weltsprache), a concept that the exhibition’s founder, the local Kassel artist and curator Arnold Bode, had also embraced.1 At the same time, as aggressive as the striking through of the motto of the past documentas appeared, Szeemann did not outright discard it; rather, he reformatted it into a new Harald Szeemann and the Road Back to the Museum","PeriodicalId":41510,"journal":{"name":"Getty Research Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"107 - 132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/702750","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harald Szeemann and the Road Back to the Museum\",\"authors\":\"Max Rosenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/702750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"107 The Event Form Early indications of what the public could expect at documenta 5 were revealed on the cover of the May/June 1970 issue of Informationen (fig. 1), a seasonal brochure on local culture in and around the city of Kassel, Germany, where the famed quinquennial contemporary art exhibition was established in 1955. In a brief schematic outline, Harald Szeemann (fig. 2), the newly appointed general secretary of documenta 5, along with a few collaborators whom he had selected to help with the organization of the show, gave a brief explanation of the approach to the next Kassel mega-exhibition. Their documenta, as the brochure makes abundantly clear, would distinguish itself from its predecessors by embracing an “event structure” (Ereignisstruktur). More than the proposal itself, a graphic featured above the text illustrated this ambition. In a large black field, “documenta IV” appeared in big white letters, but the “IV” was struck through and a “V” was printed above it. Beneath this, “Museum der 100 Tage” (100-day museum), the traditional length of the exhibition and its de facto tagline, was printed, but only “100 Tage” remained; “Museum der” was struck through and “Ereignis” (event) was added next to and slightly above the previous motto. From “Museum der 100 Tage,” the “100 Tage Ereignis” (100-day event) was born. By depicting the first conceptual proposal for the exhibition in this way, Szeemann and his coorganizers signaled that documenta 5 would constitute an assertive departure from the format and structure of the past exhibitions. Specifically, Szeemann wished to break down the traditional media distinctions and the privileging of painting and sculpture that the previous documentas had maintained. This intention also stemmed from a desire to move away from abstract painting, metonymy for modern art itself in much of the capitalist West (especially West Germany). Documenta had been a primary conduit through which abstraction had achieved broad cultural supremacy. At the first several documentas, the art historian and coorganizer of the shows Werner Haftmann had popularized the idea of abstraction as a “world language” (Weltsprache), a concept that the exhibition’s founder, the local Kassel artist and curator Arnold Bode, had also embraced.1 At the same time, as aggressive as the striking through of the motto of the past documentas appeared, Szeemann did not outright discard it; rather, he reformatted it into a new Harald Szeemann and the Road Back to the Museum\",\"PeriodicalId\":41510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Getty Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/702750\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Getty Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/702750\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Getty Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/702750","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

从1970年5月/ 6月号的《Informationen》(图1)封面上可以初步看出公众对第5届文献展的期待。《Informationen》是一本关于德国卡塞尔市及其周边地区文化的季节性小册子,1955年,著名的五年一度的当代艺术展览在卡塞尔市举办。第5届文献展新任秘书长哈拉尔德·塞曼(Harald Szeemann)(图2)与他挑选的几位合作者一起简要介绍了下一届卡塞尔大型展览的方案。他们的文献展,正如宣传册上写得非常清楚的那样,将通过采用“事件结构”(ereignisstrucktur)来区别于以往的文献展。除了提案本身,文本上方的图形还说明了这一雄心。在黑色的一大片区域里,出现了几个白色的大字“documenta IV”,但“IV”被划掉了,上面印着一个“V”。下面印着“100天博物馆”(Museum der 100 Tage),这是展览的传统长度和事实上的口号,但只剩下“100天”;“博物馆”(Museum der)被删掉,“事件”(Ereignis)被添加到前面的座右铭旁边和略高于前面的地方。从“100天博物馆”开始,“100天活动”诞生了。通过以这种方式描绘展览的第一个概念建议,塞曼和他的合作者表明,第5届文献展将构成对过去展览形式和结构的坚定背离。具体来说,塞曼希望打破以往文献展所保持的传统媒介的区别和绘画和雕塑的特权。这一意图也源于摆脱抽象画的愿望,抽象画是西方资本主义国家(尤其是西德)现代艺术本身的代名词。文献展一直是抽象主义获得广泛文化霸权的主要渠道。在最初的几届文献展上,艺术史学家、展览的共同组织者维尔纳·哈夫特曼(Werner Haftmann)普及了抽象作为“世界语言”(Weltsprache)的概念,展览的创始人、当地卡塞尔艺术家和策展人阿诺德·博德(Arnold Bode)也接受了这个概念与此同时,尽管塞曼对过去文献展的座右铭进行了激进的抨击,但他并没有完全抛弃它;相反,他把它改造成了一个新的哈拉尔德·塞曼和回到博物馆的路
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Harald Szeemann and the Road Back to the Museum
107 The Event Form Early indications of what the public could expect at documenta 5 were revealed on the cover of the May/June 1970 issue of Informationen (fig. 1), a seasonal brochure on local culture in and around the city of Kassel, Germany, where the famed quinquennial contemporary art exhibition was established in 1955. In a brief schematic outline, Harald Szeemann (fig. 2), the newly appointed general secretary of documenta 5, along with a few collaborators whom he had selected to help with the organization of the show, gave a brief explanation of the approach to the next Kassel mega-exhibition. Their documenta, as the brochure makes abundantly clear, would distinguish itself from its predecessors by embracing an “event structure” (Ereignisstruktur). More than the proposal itself, a graphic featured above the text illustrated this ambition. In a large black field, “documenta IV” appeared in big white letters, but the “IV” was struck through and a “V” was printed above it. Beneath this, “Museum der 100 Tage” (100-day museum), the traditional length of the exhibition and its de facto tagline, was printed, but only “100 Tage” remained; “Museum der” was struck through and “Ereignis” (event) was added next to and slightly above the previous motto. From “Museum der 100 Tage,” the “100 Tage Ereignis” (100-day event) was born. By depicting the first conceptual proposal for the exhibition in this way, Szeemann and his coorganizers signaled that documenta 5 would constitute an assertive departure from the format and structure of the past exhibitions. Specifically, Szeemann wished to break down the traditional media distinctions and the privileging of painting and sculpture that the previous documentas had maintained. This intention also stemmed from a desire to move away from abstract painting, metonymy for modern art itself in much of the capitalist West (especially West Germany). Documenta had been a primary conduit through which abstraction had achieved broad cultural supremacy. At the first several documentas, the art historian and coorganizer of the shows Werner Haftmann had popularized the idea of abstraction as a “world language” (Weltsprache), a concept that the exhibition’s founder, the local Kassel artist and curator Arnold Bode, had also embraced.1 At the same time, as aggressive as the striking through of the motto of the past documentas appeared, Szeemann did not outright discard it; rather, he reformatted it into a new Harald Szeemann and the Road Back to the Museum
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Getty Research Journal features the work of art historians, museum curators, and conservators around the world as part of the Getty’s mission to promote the presentation, conservation, and interpretation of the world''s artistic legacy. Articles present original scholarship related to the Getty’s collections, initiatives, and research. The journal is now available in a variety of digital formats: electronic issues are available on the JSTOR platform, and the e-Book Edition for iPad, iPhone, Kindle, Android, or computer is available for download.
期刊最新文献
“Quite Astonishing Fidelity?”: Verisimilitude and Obstruction in Jacques Joseph Tissot’s Thames Pictures The Body as Measure: Scale, Power, and Human Presence in Marc Ferrez’s Obras do novo abastecimento de água do Rio de Janeiro Jay DeFeo’s Dialectics of Painting Tracing Fannina Halle in El Lissitzky’s Letters Ancient Loom Weights at the J. Paul Getty Museum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1