不确定时代的教学:公共管理教育的未来

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching Public Administration Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1177/0144739420963154
Bruce D. McDonald
{"title":"不确定时代的教学:公共管理教育的未来","authors":"Bruce D. McDonald","doi":"10.1177/0144739420963154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), and its resulting coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), needs no introduction. Since the outbreak began in December 2019, governments and nonprofit organizations around the globe have rushed to contain the pandemic and to assist those who have been impacted (McDonald and Larson, 2020; Wu et al., 2020). As the world struggles to respond, within the field of public administration, journals such as Public Administration Review, Administrative Theory and Praxis, and Review of Public Personnel Administration have led the charge to engage researchers on projects that may assist or inform the work of our practitioner counterparts (see Deslatte et al., 2020; Kettl, 2020; Maher et al., 2020; McDonald et al., 2020). While the research has assisted in moving the recovery forward, one area that still needs attention is what the outbreak means for public administration education. We are currently in a state of uncertainty. The spring 2020 semester that shifted programs online has ended, but the planning for the 2020–2021 academic year is still underway. Despite the reopening of many economies, the anticipated second wave looms over the heads of students, faculty, and administrators alike. It is in this purgatory that two questions of pedagogy come to mind: What does the pandemic mean for the state of online education in public administration. What does it mean for how we train students going forward? It is these two questions that I would like to address in this article.","PeriodicalId":44241,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Public Administration","volume":"39 1","pages":"3 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0144739420963154","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching in uncertain times: The future of public administration education\",\"authors\":\"Bruce D. McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0144739420963154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), and its resulting coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), needs no introduction. Since the outbreak began in December 2019, governments and nonprofit organizations around the globe have rushed to contain the pandemic and to assist those who have been impacted (McDonald and Larson, 2020; Wu et al., 2020). As the world struggles to respond, within the field of public administration, journals such as Public Administration Review, Administrative Theory and Praxis, and Review of Public Personnel Administration have led the charge to engage researchers on projects that may assist or inform the work of our practitioner counterparts (see Deslatte et al., 2020; Kettl, 2020; Maher et al., 2020; McDonald et al., 2020). While the research has assisted in moving the recovery forward, one area that still needs attention is what the outbreak means for public administration education. We are currently in a state of uncertainty. The spring 2020 semester that shifted programs online has ended, but the planning for the 2020–2021 academic year is still underway. Despite the reopening of many economies, the anticipated second wave looms over the heads of students, faculty, and administrators alike. It is in this purgatory that two questions of pedagogy come to mind: What does the pandemic mean for the state of online education in public administration. What does it mean for how we train students going forward? It is these two questions that I would like to address in this article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching Public Administration\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0144739420963154\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420963154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420963154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)的爆发及其导致的冠状病毒疾病19(新冠肺炎)无需引入。自2019年12月疫情爆发以来,全球各国政府和非营利组织都在迅速控制疫情,并帮助那些受到影响的人(McDonald和Larson,2020;吴等人,2020)。在世界努力应对的同时,在公共行政领域,《公共行政评论》、《行政理论与实践》等期刊,和《公共人事管理审查》促使研究人员参与可能有助于或为我们的同行从业者的工作提供信息的项目(见Deslatte等人,2020;Kettl,2020;Maher等人,2020年;McDonald等人,2020)。尽管这项研究有助于推动复苏,但仍需要关注的一个领域是疫情对公共行政教育意味着什么。我们目前处于一种不确定的状态。将课程转移到网上的2020年春季学期已经结束,但2020-2021学年的计划仍在进行中。尽管许多经济体重新开放,但预计的第二波浪潮仍笼罩在学生、教师和行政人员的头上。正是在这场炼狱中,人们想到了教育学的两个问题:疫情对公共管理中的在线教育状况意味着什么。这对我们今后如何培养学生意味着什么?正是这两个问题,我想在这篇文章中解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teaching in uncertain times: The future of public administration education
The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), and its resulting coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), needs no introduction. Since the outbreak began in December 2019, governments and nonprofit organizations around the globe have rushed to contain the pandemic and to assist those who have been impacted (McDonald and Larson, 2020; Wu et al., 2020). As the world struggles to respond, within the field of public administration, journals such as Public Administration Review, Administrative Theory and Praxis, and Review of Public Personnel Administration have led the charge to engage researchers on projects that may assist or inform the work of our practitioner counterparts (see Deslatte et al., 2020; Kettl, 2020; Maher et al., 2020; McDonald et al., 2020). While the research has assisted in moving the recovery forward, one area that still needs attention is what the outbreak means for public administration education. We are currently in a state of uncertainty. The spring 2020 semester that shifted programs online has ended, but the planning for the 2020–2021 academic year is still underway. Despite the reopening of many economies, the anticipated second wave looms over the heads of students, faculty, and administrators alike. It is in this purgatory that two questions of pedagogy come to mind: What does the pandemic mean for the state of online education in public administration. What does it mean for how we train students going forward? It is these two questions that I would like to address in this article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching Public Administration
Teaching Public Administration EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Teaching Public Administration (TPA) is a peer-reviewed journal, published three times a year, which focuses on teaching and learning in public sector management and organisations. TPA is committed to publishing papers which promote critical thinking about the practice and process of teaching and learning as well as those which examine more theoretical and conceptual models of teaching and learning. It offers an international forum for the debate of a wide range of issues relating to how skills and knowledge are transmitted and acquired within public sector/not for profit organisations. The Editors welcome papers which draw upon multi-disciplinary ways of thinking and working and, in particular, we are interested in the following themes/issues: Learning from international practice and experience; Curriculum design and development across all levels from pre-degree to post graduate including professional development; Professional and Taught Doctoral Programmes; Reflective Practice and the role of the Reflective Practitioner; Co-production and co-construction of the curriculum; Developments within the ‘Public Administration’ discipline; Reviews of literature and policy statements.
期刊最新文献
Does Gen-AI have a role in public affairs education? Let’s ask ChatGPT Minding the gap between public administration curriculum and practice: The studio of public reasoning Book Review: Trump and the bureaucrats: The fate of neutral competence Assessing the integration of AI competencies in undergraduate public administration curricula in selected South African higher education institutions Training and retraining civil servants in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1