Miftah S. M. Nag, N. M. Al-Awkally, Ahmed Abouserwel, F. M. Senossi, Sara El-Warred, M. A. Ali
{"title":"不同临床分离株对Augmentin、亚胺培南和头孢曲松的耐药性分析","authors":"Miftah S. M. Nag, N. M. Al-Awkally, Ahmed Abouserwel, F. M. Senossi, Sara El-Warred, M. A. Ali","doi":"10.9734/jpri/2023/v35i197398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antibiotic resistance is a growing global public health concern because it jeopardizes the effective control and treatment of bacterial infections. The purpose of this study was to determine the bacterial profiles and susceptibility patterns to Imipenem, Augmentin, and Ceftriaxone in various clinical specimens from Al Saleem laboratory in Benghazi, Libya. \nMethods: Two separate studies were carried out. Each experiment lasted three months. The patients' clinical samples included wound swabs, urine, sperm, blood, high vaginal swabs, and cerebrospinal fluid. Bacterial species were isolated and identified using standard microbiological methods in each study. Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion was used to conduct antimicrobial susceptibility tests from September 2020 to November 2020. \nResults: There were 711 isolates obtained from 535 female and 503 male patients. The most common organisms isolated from specimens were E. coli spp, Klebsiella spp, and Staph aureus. \nConclusion: Bacterial resistance levels to various antibiotics varied greatly. We found that Augmentin has less activity against gram negative bacteria isolated from clinical specimens, whereas Imipenem has a much stronger effect on isolates than Augmentin. Appropriate monitoring of prevalent pathogenic organisms and their sensitivities will assist clinicians in making appropriate antibiotic treatment choices to avoid the spread of antimicrobial resistance.","PeriodicalId":16718,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Different Clinical Isolates against Augmentin, Imipenem and Ceftriaxone\",\"authors\":\"Miftah S. M. Nag, N. M. Al-Awkally, Ahmed Abouserwel, F. M. Senossi, Sara El-Warred, M. A. Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/jpri/2023/v35i197398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Antibiotic resistance is a growing global public health concern because it jeopardizes the effective control and treatment of bacterial infections. The purpose of this study was to determine the bacterial profiles and susceptibility patterns to Imipenem, Augmentin, and Ceftriaxone in various clinical specimens from Al Saleem laboratory in Benghazi, Libya. \\nMethods: Two separate studies were carried out. Each experiment lasted three months. The patients' clinical samples included wound swabs, urine, sperm, blood, high vaginal swabs, and cerebrospinal fluid. Bacterial species were isolated and identified using standard microbiological methods in each study. Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion was used to conduct antimicrobial susceptibility tests from September 2020 to November 2020. \\nResults: There were 711 isolates obtained from 535 female and 503 male patients. The most common organisms isolated from specimens were E. coli spp, Klebsiella spp, and Staph aureus. \\nConclusion: Bacterial resistance levels to various antibiotics varied greatly. We found that Augmentin has less activity against gram negative bacteria isolated from clinical specimens, whereas Imipenem has a much stronger effect on isolates than Augmentin. Appropriate monitoring of prevalent pathogenic organisms and their sensitivities will assist clinicians in making appropriate antibiotic treatment choices to avoid the spread of antimicrobial resistance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2023/v35i197398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2023/v35i197398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Different Clinical Isolates against Augmentin, Imipenem and Ceftriaxone
Background: Antibiotic resistance is a growing global public health concern because it jeopardizes the effective control and treatment of bacterial infections. The purpose of this study was to determine the bacterial profiles and susceptibility patterns to Imipenem, Augmentin, and Ceftriaxone in various clinical specimens from Al Saleem laboratory in Benghazi, Libya.
Methods: Two separate studies were carried out. Each experiment lasted three months. The patients' clinical samples included wound swabs, urine, sperm, blood, high vaginal swabs, and cerebrospinal fluid. Bacterial species were isolated and identified using standard microbiological methods in each study. Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion was used to conduct antimicrobial susceptibility tests from September 2020 to November 2020.
Results: There were 711 isolates obtained from 535 female and 503 male patients. The most common organisms isolated from specimens were E. coli spp, Klebsiella spp, and Staph aureus.
Conclusion: Bacterial resistance levels to various antibiotics varied greatly. We found that Augmentin has less activity against gram negative bacteria isolated from clinical specimens, whereas Imipenem has a much stronger effect on isolates than Augmentin. Appropriate monitoring of prevalent pathogenic organisms and their sensitivities will assist clinicians in making appropriate antibiotic treatment choices to avoid the spread of antimicrobial resistance.