成功如何孕育成功

IF 1.9 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Quantitative Economics Pub Date : 2021-07-15 DOI:10.31219/osf.io/kb5ag
Ambroise Decamps, Changxia Ke, Lionel Page
{"title":"成功如何孕育成功","authors":"Ambroise Decamps, Changxia Ke, Lionel Page","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/kb5ag","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate if, and why, an initial success can trigger a string of successes. Using random variations in success in a real-effort laboratory experiment, we cleanly identify the causal effect of an early success in a competition. We confirm that an early success indeed leads to increased chances of a later success. By alternatively eliminating strategic features of the competition, we turn on and off possible mechanisms driving the effect of an early success. Standard models of dynamic contest predict a strategic effect due to asymmetric incentives between initial winners and losers. Surprisingly, we find no evidence that they can explain the positive effect of winning. Instead, we find that the effect of winning seems driven by an information revelation effect, whereby players update their beliefs about their relative strength after experiencing an initial success.","PeriodicalId":46811,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How success breeds success\",\"authors\":\"Ambroise Decamps, Changxia Ke, Lionel Page\",\"doi\":\"10.31219/osf.io/kb5ag\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate if, and why, an initial success can trigger a string of successes. Using random variations in success in a real-effort laboratory experiment, we cleanly identify the causal effect of an early success in a competition. We confirm that an early success indeed leads to increased chances of a later success. By alternatively eliminating strategic features of the competition, we turn on and off possible mechanisms driving the effect of an early success. Standard models of dynamic contest predict a strategic effect due to asymmetric incentives between initial winners and losers. Surprisingly, we find no evidence that they can explain the positive effect of winning. Instead, we find that the effect of winning seems driven by an information revelation effect, whereby players update their beliefs about their relative strength after experiencing an initial success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/kb5ag\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/kb5ag","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

我们调查了最初的成功是否会引发一连串的成功,以及为什么会这样。通过在真实努力的实验室实验中使用成功的随机变化,我们清楚地确定了竞争中早期成功的因果效应。我们确认,早期的成功确实会增加日后成功的机会。通过交替地消除竞争的战略特征,我们可以打开或关闭驱动早期成功效果的可能机制。动态竞争的标准模型预测了由于初始赢家和输家之间的不对称激励而产生的战略效应。令人惊讶的是,我们没有发现任何证据表明它们可以解释获胜的积极影响。相反,我们发现获胜的效果似乎是由信息启示效应驱动的,即玩家在经历了最初的成功后更新了他们对自己相对实力的信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How success breeds success
We investigate if, and why, an initial success can trigger a string of successes. Using random variations in success in a real-effort laboratory experiment, we cleanly identify the causal effect of an early success in a competition. We confirm that an early success indeed leads to increased chances of a later success. By alternatively eliminating strategic features of the competition, we turn on and off possible mechanisms driving the effect of an early success. Standard models of dynamic contest predict a strategic effect due to asymmetric incentives between initial winners and losers. Surprisingly, we find no evidence that they can explain the positive effect of winning. Instead, we find that the effect of winning seems driven by an information revelation effect, whereby players update their beliefs about their relative strength after experiencing an initial success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Geometric methods for finite rational inattention Measuring trust in institutions and its causal effect A robust permutation test for subvector inference in linear regressions Difficulties in testing for capital overaccumulation Bootstrapping Laplace transforms of volatility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1