{"title":"乔治·赫伯特的《回应博物馆》和一首未发表的诗《鹪鹩与Chirothecis》被忽视的证人","authors":"R. Whalen, Luke Roman","doi":"10.1353/sip.2023.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article considers three manuscript witnesses to the Musæ Responsoriæ, George Herbert's answer to Andrew Melville's polemical poem Anti-Tami-Cami-Categoria. None of these, two of them complete copies, was known to Herbert's first modern editor, F. E. Hutchinson, nor are they mentioned in any of the several subsequent editions of Herbert's Latin verse, all of which follow Hutchinson's sole source, the 1662 Ecclesiastes Solomonis of James Duport. In addition to providing descriptions of their contents and provenance, we survey the substantive variants and accidentals pertaining to the two complete copies and argue why one in particular will supplant Duport as copy-text for the new edition of Herbert's works currently in progress for Oxford University Press. Our essay also presents a hitherto unknown Latin epigram that appears in the other complete copy and considers evidence for attributing the poem to the author of The Temple.","PeriodicalId":45500,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","volume":"120 1","pages":"247 - 283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neglected Witnesses to George Herbert's Musæ Responsoriæ, and a Previously Unpublished Poem, \\\"Wren cum Chirothecis\\\"\",\"authors\":\"R. Whalen, Luke Roman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sip.2023.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article considers three manuscript witnesses to the Musæ Responsoriæ, George Herbert's answer to Andrew Melville's polemical poem Anti-Tami-Cami-Categoria. None of these, two of them complete copies, was known to Herbert's first modern editor, F. E. Hutchinson, nor are they mentioned in any of the several subsequent editions of Herbert's Latin verse, all of which follow Hutchinson's sole source, the 1662 Ecclesiastes Solomonis of James Duport. In addition to providing descriptions of their contents and provenance, we survey the substantive variants and accidentals pertaining to the two complete copies and argue why one in particular will supplant Duport as copy-text for the new edition of Herbert's works currently in progress for Oxford University Press. Our essay also presents a hitherto unknown Latin epigram that appears in the other complete copy and considers evidence for attributing the poem to the author of The Temple.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"247 - 283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2023.0008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2023.0008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:本文考虑了乔治·赫伯特(George Herbert)对安德鲁·梅尔维尔(Andrew Melville)的论战诗《反塔米·卡米·卡特戈里亚》(Anti-Tami Cami Categoria)的回答《回应博物馆》(MusæResponsoriæ)的三位手稿见证人。赫伯特的第一位现代编辑F.E.Hutchinson不知道这些,其中两本是完整的,赫伯特的拉丁诗的后续几个版本中也没有提到它们,所有这些版本都遵循了Hutchinsson的唯一来源,1662年詹姆斯·杜波特的《所罗门传道书》。除了提供其内容和出处的描述外,我们还调查了与这两份完整副本有关的实质性变体和意外,并解释了为什么其中一份将取代Duport成为目前正在为牛津大学出版社出版的赫伯特作品新版的复制文本。我们的文章还提出了一个迄今为止不为人知的拉丁语警句,出现在另一个完整的副本中,并考虑了将这首诗归因于《圣殿》作者的证据。
Neglected Witnesses to George Herbert's Musæ Responsoriæ, and a Previously Unpublished Poem, "Wren cum Chirothecis"
Abstract:This article considers three manuscript witnesses to the Musæ Responsoriæ, George Herbert's answer to Andrew Melville's polemical poem Anti-Tami-Cami-Categoria. None of these, two of them complete copies, was known to Herbert's first modern editor, F. E. Hutchinson, nor are they mentioned in any of the several subsequent editions of Herbert's Latin verse, all of which follow Hutchinson's sole source, the 1662 Ecclesiastes Solomonis of James Duport. In addition to providing descriptions of their contents and provenance, we survey the substantive variants and accidentals pertaining to the two complete copies and argue why one in particular will supplant Duport as copy-text for the new edition of Herbert's works currently in progress for Oxford University Press. Our essay also presents a hitherto unknown Latin epigram that appears in the other complete copy and considers evidence for attributing the poem to the author of The Temple.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1903, Studies in Philology addresses scholars in a wide range of disciplines, though traditionally its strength has been English Medieval and Renaissance studies. SIP publishes articles on British literature before 1900 and on relations between British literature and works in the Classical, Romance, and Germanic Languages.