寻求基于证据的戒毒治疗:比利时TC De Kiem 40年的研究

W. Vanderplasschen, S. Vandevelde, C. De Ruysscher, Dirk Vandevelde, E. Broekaert
{"title":"寻求基于证据的戒毒治疗:比利时TC De Kiem 40年的研究","authors":"W. Vanderplasschen, S. Vandevelde, C. De Ruysscher, Dirk Vandevelde, E. Broekaert","doi":"10.1080/1556035X.2017.1312656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite more than 40 years of research, limited evidence is available for the effectiveness of drug-free therapeutic communities (TCs). Worldwide, TCs have attempted succesfully to integrate innovative and evidence-based interventions, while adhering to the “community as method” (De Leon, 2000). This article is a case study of scientific research on practice and innovations in a TC, De Kiem (Belgium), over the past 40 years, illustrating how research and innovative approaches have shaped the TC into its current practice. From the start, scientific research was used to develop and adapt the TC program. International collaboration introduced new ideas, instruments, and methods and promoted a culture of inquiry. Several interventions that were implemented have contributed successfully to increased program retention, like the introduction of a welcome house phase, social network support, and a mother and child program.","PeriodicalId":88011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery","volume":"12 1","pages":"177 - 195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1556035X.2017.1312656","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Search of Evidence-Based Treatment in TCs for Addictions: 40 Years of Research in TC De Kiem (Belgium)\",\"authors\":\"W. Vanderplasschen, S. Vandevelde, C. De Ruysscher, Dirk Vandevelde, E. Broekaert\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1556035X.2017.1312656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Despite more than 40 years of research, limited evidence is available for the effectiveness of drug-free therapeutic communities (TCs). Worldwide, TCs have attempted succesfully to integrate innovative and evidence-based interventions, while adhering to the “community as method” (De Leon, 2000). This article is a case study of scientific research on practice and innovations in a TC, De Kiem (Belgium), over the past 40 years, illustrating how research and innovative approaches have shaped the TC into its current practice. From the start, scientific research was used to develop and adapt the TC program. International collaboration introduced new ideas, instruments, and methods and promoted a culture of inquiry. Several interventions that were implemented have contributed successfully to increased program retention, like the introduction of a welcome house phase, social network support, and a mother and child program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"177 - 195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1556035X.2017.1312656\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1556035X.2017.1312656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1556035X.2017.1312656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要尽管经过40多年的研究,但无药物治疗社区(TC)的有效性证据有限。在世界范围内,TC成功地尝试整合创新和循证干预措施,同时坚持“社区即方法”(De Leon,2000)。本文是De Kiem(比利时)TC在过去40年中对实践和创新的科学研究的案例研究,说明了研究和创新方法如何将TC塑造成其当前的实践。从一开始,科学研究就被用来制定和调整TC计划。国际合作引入了新的思想、工具和方法,并促进了探究文化。实施的几项干预措施成功地提高了项目的保留率,如引入欢迎之家阶段、社会网络支持和母婴计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In Search of Evidence-Based Treatment in TCs for Addictions: 40 Years of Research in TC De Kiem (Belgium)
ABSTRACT Despite more than 40 years of research, limited evidence is available for the effectiveness of drug-free therapeutic communities (TCs). Worldwide, TCs have attempted succesfully to integrate innovative and evidence-based interventions, while adhering to the “community as method” (De Leon, 2000). This article is a case study of scientific research on practice and innovations in a TC, De Kiem (Belgium), over the past 40 years, illustrating how research and innovative approaches have shaped the TC into its current practice. From the start, scientific research was used to develop and adapt the TC program. International collaboration introduced new ideas, instruments, and methods and promoted a culture of inquiry. Several interventions that were implemented have contributed successfully to increased program retention, like the introduction of a welcome house phase, social network support, and a mother and child program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Feasibility Study and Design of the ICU Infection Registry System for Patients Admitted to the Alzahra University Hospital in Isfahan: A Methodology Study. Is L-Glutamate Toxic to Neurons and Thereby Contributes to Neuronal Loss and Neurodegeneration? A Systematic Review. A Revised Multifamily Group Curriculum: The Need for Family Member Recovery from Addiction Rolling Psychodynamic Group for Cocaine Use Disorder: A Single-Group Study Using Multilevel Models The Window Opens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1