宗教教育者如何准确地预测学生成绩?

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION Religion & Education Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1080/15507394.2021.1888681
K. Lyons, K. Thiede, R. Osguthorpe
{"title":"宗教教育者如何准确地预测学生成绩?","authors":"K. Lyons, K. Thiede, R. Osguthorpe","doi":"10.1080/15507394.2021.1888681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Teachers make a variety of judgments as they teach. The accuracy of these judgments may influence instruction and student achievement. This study examined how accurately religious educators judge student learning, what cues they report using to make judgements, and how cue utilization affected their accuracy. Judgment accuracy was greater for teachers who reported using cues related to class performance than for those who did not. Judgment accuracy was greater for those who did not report using personal attributes as a cue than for those who did. These results are explained in the context of the cue-utilization framework.","PeriodicalId":43359,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15507394.2021.1888681","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Accurately Can Religious Educators Predict Student Achievement?\",\"authors\":\"K. Lyons, K. Thiede, R. Osguthorpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15507394.2021.1888681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Teachers make a variety of judgments as they teach. The accuracy of these judgments may influence instruction and student achievement. This study examined how accurately religious educators judge student learning, what cues they report using to make judgements, and how cue utilization affected their accuracy. Judgment accuracy was greater for teachers who reported using cues related to class performance than for those who did not. Judgment accuracy was greater for those who did not report using personal attributes as a cue than for those who did. These results are explained in the context of the cue-utilization framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion & Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15507394.2021.1888681\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2021.1888681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2021.1888681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要教师在教学过程中会做出各种各样的判断。这些判断的准确性可能会影响教学和学生的成绩。这项研究考察了宗教教育者如何准确地判断学生的学习,他们报告使用了什么线索来做出判断,以及线索的使用如何影响他们的准确性。报告使用与课堂表现相关的线索的教师的判断准确性高于未报告使用的教师。那些没有使用个人属性作为线索进行报告的人的判断准确性高于那些使用个人属性的人。这些结果是在线索利用框架的背景下解释的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Accurately Can Religious Educators Predict Student Achievement?
Abstract Teachers make a variety of judgments as they teach. The accuracy of these judgments may influence instruction and student achievement. This study examined how accurately religious educators judge student learning, what cues they report using to make judgements, and how cue utilization affected their accuracy. Judgment accuracy was greater for teachers who reported using cues related to class performance than for those who did not. Judgment accuracy was greater for those who did not report using personal attributes as a cue than for those who did. These results are explained in the context of the cue-utilization framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
50 Years of Religion & Education: The Origins of the Journal and the Interdisciplinary Study of Religion and Education Religion, Education, and the Future of Democratic Pluralism Review: Spirituality That Makes a Difference, by Charles R. Kniker, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2022; ISBN: 978-1-6667-1789-1 “One More Thing”: Clarifying the Evidence Around Christian Privilege in Higher Education Catholic and Public Schools Compared: Examining Achievement Growth in an Urban Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1