项目组成部分在德国巴特伯格扎本内城河流修复项目验收中的作用

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 WATER RESOURCES Water Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.2166/wp.2023.254
S. Weiß, J. Schilling, O. Frör
{"title":"项目组成部分在德国巴特伯格扎本内城河流修复项目验收中的作用","authors":"S. Weiß, J. Schilling, O. Frör","doi":"10.2166/wp.2023.254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The poor conditions of rivers worldwide make restoration an issue of great importance and urgency. The acceptance of restoration by society is crucial, however, the factors determining such acceptance are still poorly understood. In particular, the understanding of the complex interplay between the acceptance or rejection of specific project components and the acceptance of the overall project require further exploration. To address this research gap, we analyze a restoration project in Bad Bergzabern, Germany to (1) investigate the acceptance of the overall project and its components, and (2) explore why people accept or reject specific components. Three hundred and twenty-one in-person interviews were conducted and the factors of acceptance were analyzed using logistic regression. Our findings show that while acceptance of the overall project is generally high, many respondents reject one or more project components. Complementary social project components, like a playground, find less support than purely ecological components. Overall, our research shows that differences in the acceptance of components depend on individual concerns, the quality of communication, attachment to the site, and age. Our results contribute to a better understanding of preferences for river restoration projects and help water managers design restoration projects that are highly accepted by society.","PeriodicalId":49370,"journal":{"name":"Water Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of project components for the acceptance of an inner city river restoration project in Bad Bergzabern, Germany\",\"authors\":\"S. Weiß, J. Schilling, O. Frör\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wp.2023.254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The poor conditions of rivers worldwide make restoration an issue of great importance and urgency. The acceptance of restoration by society is crucial, however, the factors determining such acceptance are still poorly understood. In particular, the understanding of the complex interplay between the acceptance or rejection of specific project components and the acceptance of the overall project require further exploration. To address this research gap, we analyze a restoration project in Bad Bergzabern, Germany to (1) investigate the acceptance of the overall project and its components, and (2) explore why people accept or reject specific components. Three hundred and twenty-one in-person interviews were conducted and the factors of acceptance were analyzed using logistic regression. Our findings show that while acceptance of the overall project is generally high, many respondents reject one or more project components. Complementary social project components, like a playground, find less support than purely ecological components. Overall, our research shows that differences in the acceptance of components depend on individual concerns, the quality of communication, attachment to the site, and age. Our results contribute to a better understanding of preferences for river restoration projects and help water managers design restoration projects that are highly accepted by society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2023.254\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2023.254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界各地河流的恶劣条件使修复成为一个非常重要和紧迫的问题。社会对修复的接受是至关重要的,然而,对决定这种接受的因素仍知之甚少。特别是,要理解接受或拒绝特定项目组成部分与接受整个项目之间的复杂相互作用,还需要进一步探索。为了弥补这一研究空白,我们分析了德国巴特伯格扎本的一个修复项目,以(1)调查整个项目及其组成部分的接受程度,以及(2)探讨人们为什么接受或拒绝特定的组成部分。进行了321次面对面访谈,并使用逻辑回归分析了接受的因素。我们的调查结果表明,虽然总体项目的接受度普遍较高,但许多受访者拒绝接受一个或多个项目组成部分。互补的社会项目组成部分,如游乐场,比纯粹的生态组成部分得到的支持更少。总体而言,我们的研究表明,组件接受度的差异取决于个人关注点、沟通质量、对网站的依恋程度和年龄。我们的研究结果有助于更好地了解人们对河流修复项目的偏好,并帮助水资源管理者设计出被社会高度接受的修复项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of project components for the acceptance of an inner city river restoration project in Bad Bergzabern, Germany
The poor conditions of rivers worldwide make restoration an issue of great importance and urgency. The acceptance of restoration by society is crucial, however, the factors determining such acceptance are still poorly understood. In particular, the understanding of the complex interplay between the acceptance or rejection of specific project components and the acceptance of the overall project require further exploration. To address this research gap, we analyze a restoration project in Bad Bergzabern, Germany to (1) investigate the acceptance of the overall project and its components, and (2) explore why people accept or reject specific components. Three hundred and twenty-one in-person interviews were conducted and the factors of acceptance were analyzed using logistic regression. Our findings show that while acceptance of the overall project is generally high, many respondents reject one or more project components. Complementary social project components, like a playground, find less support than purely ecological components. Overall, our research shows that differences in the acceptance of components depend on individual concerns, the quality of communication, attachment to the site, and age. Our results contribute to a better understanding of preferences for river restoration projects and help water managers design restoration projects that are highly accepted by society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Policy
Water Policy 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Water Policy will publish reviews, research papers and progress reports in, among others, the following areas: financial, diplomatic, organizational, legal, administrative and research; organized by country, region or river basin. Water Policy also publishes reviews of books and grey literature.
期刊最新文献
Water governance puzzle in Riau Province: uncovering key actors and interactions A socio-ecological evaluation of the conservation efforts in the Nevado de Toluca protected area, Mexico: Governmental performance and local community perception from a rural context Assessment of health impacts of quality water provisioning from groundwater sources: a micro-level study in India Contextualizing institutional capacity in water governance framework: a literature review Farmers' resilience index: a tool to metricize the resilience of the farmers towards natural disasters affecting agriculture in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1