耳穴放血治疗失眠症的有效性和安全性:一项评估盲导随机对照试验

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.1016/S0254-6272(18)30916-6
Ni Jing , Wang Bin , Wang Fuzhuang , Zhou Hongwei , Shi Huaxin , Zhang Ninan , Zhao Hong , Xie Qi
{"title":"耳穴放血治疗失眠症的有效性和安全性:一项评估盲导随机对照试验","authors":"Ni Jing ,&nbsp;Wang Bin ,&nbsp;Wang Fuzhuang ,&nbsp;Zhou Hongwei ,&nbsp;Shi Huaxin ,&nbsp;Zhang Ninan ,&nbsp;Zhao Hong ,&nbsp;Xie Qi","doi":"10.1016/S0254-6272(18)30916-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of auricular acupoint bloodletting in treatment of insomnia</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Participants (<em>n</em> = 60) with insomnia were randomized into two groups to receive treatment of auricular acupoint bloodletting: low frequency group, 1 times/week for five weeks (<em>n</em> = 30); high frequency group, 2times/week for two weeks (<em>n</em> = 30). The following outcomes were measured blindly at baseline, after first treatment, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks: Pittsburgh sleep quality index scale (PSQI).</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>The groups were balanced at baseline for insomnia and demographic characteristics. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of any of the outcomes, at the first follow-up time point. However, the therapeutic effect of LFG (once per week) is obviously lower than that of HFG (twice per week). In addition, there was no significant difference in the side effects between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>The treatment of insomnia with different frequencies of auricular acupoint bloodletting is effective and has less side effects. More reasonable treatment frequencies are worth further study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0254-6272(18)30916-6","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and safety of auricular acupoint bloodletting in treatment of insomnia: an assessor-blinded pilot randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Ni Jing ,&nbsp;Wang Bin ,&nbsp;Wang Fuzhuang ,&nbsp;Zhou Hongwei ,&nbsp;Shi Huaxin ,&nbsp;Zhang Ninan ,&nbsp;Zhao Hong ,&nbsp;Xie Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0254-6272(18)30916-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of auricular acupoint bloodletting in treatment of insomnia</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Participants (<em>n</em> = 60) with insomnia were randomized into two groups to receive treatment of auricular acupoint bloodletting: low frequency group, 1 times/week for five weeks (<em>n</em> = 30); high frequency group, 2times/week for two weeks (<em>n</em> = 30). The following outcomes were measured blindly at baseline, after first treatment, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks: Pittsburgh sleep quality index scale (PSQI).</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>The groups were balanced at baseline for insomnia and demographic characteristics. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of any of the outcomes, at the first follow-up time point. However, the therapeutic effect of LFG (once per week) is obviously lower than that of HFG (twice per week). In addition, there was no significant difference in the side effects between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>The treatment of insomnia with different frequencies of auricular acupoint bloodletting is effective and has less side effects. More reasonable treatment frequencies are worth further study.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0254-6272(18)30916-6\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254627218309166\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254627218309166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的评价耳穴放血治疗失眠症的有效性和安全性。方法将60例失眠症患者随机分为两组:低频组,每周1次,连续5周(n = 30);高频组,2次/周,连续2周(n = 30)。在基线、第一次治疗后、第4周和第8周盲测以下结果:匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI)。结果两组在失眠症和人口学特征基线上达到平衡。在第一个随访时间点,两组之间的任何结果都没有显著差异。但LFG(每周一次)的治疗效果明显低于HFG(每周两次)。此外,两组之间的副作用无显著差异。结论不同频率的耳穴放血治疗失眠症疗效确切,副作用少。更合理的治疗频率值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness and safety of auricular acupoint bloodletting in treatment of insomnia: an assessor-blinded pilot randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of auricular acupoint bloodletting in treatment of insomnia

METHODS

Participants (n = 60) with insomnia were randomized into two groups to receive treatment of auricular acupoint bloodletting: low frequency group, 1 times/week for five weeks (n = 30); high frequency group, 2times/week for two weeks (n = 30). The following outcomes were measured blindly at baseline, after first treatment, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks: Pittsburgh sleep quality index scale (PSQI).

RESULTS

The groups were balanced at baseline for insomnia and demographic characteristics. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of any of the outcomes, at the first follow-up time point. However, the therapeutic effect of LFG (once per week) is obviously lower than that of HFG (twice per week). In addition, there was no significant difference in the side effects between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of insomnia with different frequencies of auricular acupoint bloodletting is effective and has less side effects. More reasonable treatment frequencies are worth further study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
32269
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine(JTCM) is devoted to clinical and theortical research on the use of acupuncture and Oriental medicine. The main columns include Clinical Observations, Basic Investigations, Reviews, Questions and Answers, an Expert''s Forum, and Discussions of Clinical Cases. Its key topics include acupuncture and electro-acupuncture, herbal medicine, homeopathy, masseotherapy, mind-body therapies, palliative care, and other CAM therapies.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Shenqi Yangxin decoction on high mobility group box 1 and inflammatory signal pathway in a rat model of dilated cardiomyopathy Involvement of heme oxygenase-1 induction in anti-vascular inflammation effects of Xanthoceras sorbifolia in human umbilical vein endothelial cells Possible mechanism underlying analgesic effect of Tuina in rats may involve piezo mechanosensitive channels within dorsal root ganglia axon Effect of Jianpi Bushen formula on aromatase-inhibitor-associated bone loss after menopause Effect of Cuzhi liquid on learning and memory dysfunction in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1