{"title":"三种语法和符号","authors":"C. Denroche","doi":"10.1075/RCL.00081.DEN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article presents an original three-component model of the linguistic sign. It shares with the established\n triadic models of Peirce (1955 [1897]) and Ogden\n and Richards (1923/1949) in identifying thought, word and thing as essential components; but differs\n in being linear, with thought and thing at opposite poles. It is argued that this arrangement reflects the way\n the components of the sign relate to reality and thereby serves well as an explanatory tool for linguistic research. The model is\n further modified at each of the ontological realms using concepts from cognitive linguistics, renamed cognition, language\n and reality. The new model is employed as a research tool in two case studies: one illustrates its use in making sense of\n the complex field of language grammar; the other does the same for figurative language – metaphor and metonymy. The article’s\n conclusions include that interrogating established cornerstones of linguistic theory in the light of new theory can lead to the\n development of improved research tools.","PeriodicalId":51932,"journal":{"name":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Three Grammars and the sign\",\"authors\":\"C. Denroche\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/RCL.00081.DEN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article presents an original three-component model of the linguistic sign. It shares with the established\\n triadic models of Peirce (1955 [1897]) and Ogden\\n and Richards (1923/1949) in identifying thought, word and thing as essential components; but differs\\n in being linear, with thought and thing at opposite poles. It is argued that this arrangement reflects the way\\n the components of the sign relate to reality and thereby serves well as an explanatory tool for linguistic research. The model is\\n further modified at each of the ontological realms using concepts from cognitive linguistics, renamed cognition, language\\n and reality. The new model is employed as a research tool in two case studies: one illustrates its use in making sense of\\n the complex field of language grammar; the other does the same for figurative language – metaphor and metonymy. The article’s\\n conclusions include that interrogating established cornerstones of linguistic theory in the light of new theory can lead to the\\n development of improved research tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Cognitive Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Cognitive Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/RCL.00081.DEN\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/RCL.00081.DEN","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article presents an original three-component model of the linguistic sign. It shares with the established
triadic models of Peirce (1955 [1897]) and Ogden
and Richards (1923/1949) in identifying thought, word and thing as essential components; but differs
in being linear, with thought and thing at opposite poles. It is argued that this arrangement reflects the way
the components of the sign relate to reality and thereby serves well as an explanatory tool for linguistic research. The model is
further modified at each of the ontological realms using concepts from cognitive linguistics, renamed cognition, language
and reality. The new model is employed as a research tool in two case studies: one illustrates its use in making sense of
the complex field of language grammar; the other does the same for figurative language – metaphor and metonymy. The article’s
conclusions include that interrogating established cornerstones of linguistic theory in the light of new theory can lead to the
development of improved research tools.