用于手术室的床边3d打印设备的灭菌

Jeremy Wiseman , Thampi Rawther , Marc Langbart , Michael Kernohan , Quan Ngo
{"title":"用于手术室的床边3d打印设备的灭菌","authors":"Jeremy Wiseman ,&nbsp;Thampi Rawther ,&nbsp;Marc Langbart ,&nbsp;Michael Kernohan ,&nbsp;Quan Ngo","doi":"10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The desire to rapidly integrate 3D printing technology by the surgical community, using both commercially available 3D printed custom devices and the emerging trend toward benchtop solutions. Sterilization guidelines for commercially available medical devices, is defined by manufacturers following industrial testing of approved sterilization protocols, whereas benchtop or bedside manufacture of devices by surgical units wishing to adopt and use 3D printed materials represents a grey area where regulation, standards or guidelines do not currently exist. To address this question, we have reviewed the literature. A search of Pubmed for search terms relating to sterilization and 3D printing was subjected to abstract and bibliographic review to identify relevant articles discussing sterilization of 3D printed devices or materials. Only a handful of authors in the peer reviewed literature have addressed the issue of sterilization of 3D printed materials. Commercial “white papers” provide the remainder of available information on the subject. In the quest to adapt and evolve our surgical practice toward the use of “benchtop” 3D-printing, the issue of sterilization was readily identified. The anecdotal experience reported here, with failed attempts using heat dependent sterilization together with evaluation of the literature and review of the available options has directed us toward low-temperature sterilization techniques as standard for sterilization of “in house” 3D printed Models. VHP as a widely institutionally available and employed technology would seem the logical choice as it is readily available, commonly used technique in hospital sterilization departments and quick , simple process compatible with a variety of materials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72210,"journal":{"name":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000017/pdfft?md5=f587f0f808756f205606fe25eb1eed30&pid=1-s2.0-S2666964122000017-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sterilization of bedside 3D-printed devices for use in the operating room\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Wiseman ,&nbsp;Thampi Rawther ,&nbsp;Marc Langbart ,&nbsp;Michael Kernohan ,&nbsp;Quan Ngo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The desire to rapidly integrate 3D printing technology by the surgical community, using both commercially available 3D printed custom devices and the emerging trend toward benchtop solutions. Sterilization guidelines for commercially available medical devices, is defined by manufacturers following industrial testing of approved sterilization protocols, whereas benchtop or bedside manufacture of devices by surgical units wishing to adopt and use 3D printed materials represents a grey area where regulation, standards or guidelines do not currently exist. To address this question, we have reviewed the literature. A search of Pubmed for search terms relating to sterilization and 3D printing was subjected to abstract and bibliographic review to identify relevant articles discussing sterilization of 3D printed devices or materials. Only a handful of authors in the peer reviewed literature have addressed the issue of sterilization of 3D printed materials. Commercial “white papers” provide the remainder of available information on the subject. In the quest to adapt and evolve our surgical practice toward the use of “benchtop” 3D-printing, the issue of sterilization was readily identified. The anecdotal experience reported here, with failed attempts using heat dependent sterilization together with evaluation of the literature and review of the available options has directed us toward low-temperature sterilization techniques as standard for sterilization of “in house” 3D printed Models. VHP as a widely institutionally available and employed technology would seem the logical choice as it is readily available, commonly used technique in hospital sterilization departments and quick , simple process compatible with a variety of materials.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of 3D printed medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000017/pdfft?md5=f587f0f808756f205606fe25eb1eed30&pid=1-s2.0-S2666964122000017-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of 3D printed medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

通过使用商用3D打印定制设备和台式解决方案的新兴趋势,外科社区希望快速集成3D打印技术。商用医疗设备的灭菌指南是由制造商根据经批准的灭菌协议进行工业测试后定义的,而希望采用和使用3D打印材料的外科单位的台式或床边设备制造则是一个灰色地带,目前没有法规、标准或指南。为了解决这个问题,我们回顾了文献。在Pubmed中搜索与灭菌和3D打印相关的搜索词,进行摘要和书目审查,以确定讨论3D打印设备或材料灭菌的相关文章。在同行评审的文献中,只有少数作者解决了3D打印材料灭菌的问题。商业“白皮书”提供有关该主题的剩余可用信息。为了适应和发展我们的手术实践,使用“台式”3d打印,消毒问题很容易确定。这里报道的轶事经验,使用热依赖灭菌的失败尝试,以及对文献的评估和对可用选项的回顾,已经指导我们将低温灭菌技术作为“内部”3D打印模型灭菌的标准。VHP作为一种广泛的机构可用和使用的技术似乎是合乎逻辑的选择,因为它易于获得,是医院灭菌部门常用的技术,并且快速,简单的过程与各种材料兼容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sterilization of bedside 3D-printed devices for use in the operating room

The desire to rapidly integrate 3D printing technology by the surgical community, using both commercially available 3D printed custom devices and the emerging trend toward benchtop solutions. Sterilization guidelines for commercially available medical devices, is defined by manufacturers following industrial testing of approved sterilization protocols, whereas benchtop or bedside manufacture of devices by surgical units wishing to adopt and use 3D printed materials represents a grey area where regulation, standards or guidelines do not currently exist. To address this question, we have reviewed the literature. A search of Pubmed for search terms relating to sterilization and 3D printing was subjected to abstract and bibliographic review to identify relevant articles discussing sterilization of 3D printed devices or materials. Only a handful of authors in the peer reviewed literature have addressed the issue of sterilization of 3D printed materials. Commercial “white papers” provide the remainder of available information on the subject. In the quest to adapt and evolve our surgical practice toward the use of “benchtop” 3D-printing, the issue of sterilization was readily identified. The anecdotal experience reported here, with failed attempts using heat dependent sterilization together with evaluation of the literature and review of the available options has directed us toward low-temperature sterilization techniques as standard for sterilization of “in house” 3D printed Models. VHP as a widely institutionally available and employed technology would seem the logical choice as it is readily available, commonly used technique in hospital sterilization departments and quick , simple process compatible with a variety of materials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of 3D printed medicine
Annals of 3D printed medicine Medicine and Dentistry (General), Materials Science (General)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
131 days
期刊最新文献
A novel approach to hallucal sesamoid pathology utilizing a 3D printed patient specific total sesamoid replacement implant: Case series Selective laser sintering at the Point-of-Care 3D printing laboratory in hospitals for cranio-maxillo-facial surgery: A further step into industrial additive manufacturing made available to clinicians Editorial Board Contents 3D-printed β-TCP/Ti6Al4V composite scaffolds for bone regeneration: Process parameter optimization and evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1