新冠肺炎大流行期间资源短缺情况下决策的生物伦理视角

Q2 Arts and Humanities Medicina e Morale Pub Date : 2022-04-14 DOI:10.4081/mem.2022.1197
Maria Del Pilar De Antueno, G. Peirano, Isabel Pincemín, Maria Isabel Iñigo Petralanda, E. Bruera
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行期间资源短缺情况下决策的生物伦理视角","authors":"Maria Del Pilar De Antueno, G. Peirano, Isabel Pincemín, Maria Isabel Iñigo Petralanda, E. Bruera","doi":"10.4081/mem.2022.1197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lack of resources available in intensive care units (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic requires bioethical guidance to respond to dilemmas presented in health teams. A person-centered ethical analysis (PCEA) for ICU clinicians, becomes the best alternative to morally justify extreme decision-making in the scarcity of available resources. The goal is to make a selection based on bioethical and clinical criteria, considering a holistic view of the person, and not just a utilitarian or first-come, first-served criterion as the one set out by colleagues from Oxford University, known as RAPR (Resource Adjusted Probability Ratio) ethical algorithm for rationing life-sustaining treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. For this reason, fundamental bioethical principles emphasizing therapeutic proportionality and how to make an appropriate moral judgment that conveys to a sensible decision-making ethically grounded are explained, considering a flow chart proposed by colleagues from the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. In this paper we propose the PCEA Algorithm to assist ICU teams in decision making regarding fair resource allocation and care delivery during an overwhelming pandemic scenario.","PeriodicalId":36708,"journal":{"name":"Medicina e Morale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioethical perspective for decision making in situations of scarcity of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Maria Del Pilar De Antueno, G. Peirano, Isabel Pincemín, Maria Isabel Iñigo Petralanda, E. Bruera\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/mem.2022.1197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lack of resources available in intensive care units (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic requires bioethical guidance to respond to dilemmas presented in health teams. A person-centered ethical analysis (PCEA) for ICU clinicians, becomes the best alternative to morally justify extreme decision-making in the scarcity of available resources. The goal is to make a selection based on bioethical and clinical criteria, considering a holistic view of the person, and not just a utilitarian or first-come, first-served criterion as the one set out by colleagues from Oxford University, known as RAPR (Resource Adjusted Probability Ratio) ethical algorithm for rationing life-sustaining treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. For this reason, fundamental bioethical principles emphasizing therapeutic proportionality and how to make an appropriate moral judgment that conveys to a sensible decision-making ethically grounded are explained, considering a flow chart proposed by colleagues from the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. In this paper we propose the PCEA Algorithm to assist ICU teams in decision making regarding fair resource allocation and care delivery during an overwhelming pandemic scenario.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina e Morale\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina e Morale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2022.1197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina e Morale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2022.1197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎大流行期间重症监护室(ICU)缺乏可用资源,需要生物伦理指导来应对卫生团队面临的困境。针对ICU临床医生的以人为中心的伦理分析(PCEA)成为在可用资源稀缺的情况下从道德上证明极端决策合理的最佳选择。目标是根据生物伦理和临床标准进行选择,考虑到对个人的整体看法,而不仅仅是牛津大学同事提出的实用或先到先得的标准,即所谓的RAPR(资源调整概率比)道德算法,用于在新冠肺炎大流行期间定量提供终身治疗。因此,考虑到智利宗座天主教大学同事提出的流程图,解释了强调治疗相称性的基本生物伦理原则,以及如何做出适当的道德判断,以传达合乎道德的明智决策。在本文中,我们提出了PCEA算法,以帮助重症监护室团队在压倒性的疫情情况下就公平的资源分配和护理提供做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bioethical perspective for decision making in situations of scarcity of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic
Lack of resources available in intensive care units (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic requires bioethical guidance to respond to dilemmas presented in health teams. A person-centered ethical analysis (PCEA) for ICU clinicians, becomes the best alternative to morally justify extreme decision-making in the scarcity of available resources. The goal is to make a selection based on bioethical and clinical criteria, considering a holistic view of the person, and not just a utilitarian or first-come, first-served criterion as the one set out by colleagues from Oxford University, known as RAPR (Resource Adjusted Probability Ratio) ethical algorithm for rationing life-sustaining treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. For this reason, fundamental bioethical principles emphasizing therapeutic proportionality and how to make an appropriate moral judgment that conveys to a sensible decision-making ethically grounded are explained, considering a flow chart proposed by colleagues from the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. In this paper we propose the PCEA Algorithm to assist ICU teams in decision making regarding fair resource allocation and care delivery during an overwhelming pandemic scenario.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina e Morale
Medicina e Morale Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Contragestation or hidden abortion Consent in the psychotherapy setting Protection of animal welfare and regulation of animal experimentation Antiandrogens in the treatment of violent sexual behavior: ethical reflections Continuing care unit: new therapeutic and care solution in terminal illness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1