“为我们所有人带来成果”:作为文学教育标志性教学法的社会注释

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Arts and Humanities in Higher Education Pub Date : 2020-03-29 DOI:10.1177/1474022220915128
Jeffrey Clapp, M. Decoursey, Sze Wah Sarah Lee, Krista Li
{"title":"“为我们所有人带来成果”:作为文学教育标志性教学法的社会注释","authors":"Jeffrey Clapp, M. Decoursey, Sze Wah Sarah Lee, Krista Li","doi":"10.1177/1474022220915128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New social annotation practices have the potential to become a “signature pedagogy” for educators in literary studies, because social annotation encapsulates both the expected learning outcomes and the underlying value commitments of literature education. We give an account of a project conducted by colleagues at the Education University of Hong Kong, during which colleagues explored social annotation technologies in literary studies courses. After implementing social annotation in our courses, instructors held roundtable discussions, collected surveys and conducted focus group interviews. Basing our interpretation of these data on Louise Rosenblatt’s transactional theory of reading and writing, we propose that social annotation can help students engage with literary texts more effectively by showing them how to move toward an aesthetic mode of reading. Students participating in social annotation, moreover, understood its application to literary studies in ways that directly reproduced Rosenblatt’s account of literary interpretation.","PeriodicalId":45787,"journal":{"name":"Arts and Humanities in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1474022220915128","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Something fruitful for all of us”: Social annotation as a signature pedagogy for literature education\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Clapp, M. Decoursey, Sze Wah Sarah Lee, Krista Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1474022220915128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New social annotation practices have the potential to become a “signature pedagogy” for educators in literary studies, because social annotation encapsulates both the expected learning outcomes and the underlying value commitments of literature education. We give an account of a project conducted by colleagues at the Education University of Hong Kong, during which colleagues explored social annotation technologies in literary studies courses. After implementing social annotation in our courses, instructors held roundtable discussions, collected surveys and conducted focus group interviews. Basing our interpretation of these data on Louise Rosenblatt’s transactional theory of reading and writing, we propose that social annotation can help students engage with literary texts more effectively by showing them how to move toward an aesthetic mode of reading. Students participating in social annotation, moreover, understood its application to literary studies in ways that directly reproduced Rosenblatt’s account of literary interpretation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arts and Humanities in Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1474022220915128\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arts and Humanities in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022220915128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts and Humanities in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022220915128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

新的社会注释实践有可能成为文学研究中教育工作者的“标志性教育学”,因为社会注释包含了文学教育的预期学习成果和潜在价值承诺。我们介绍了香港教育大学的同事们进行的一个项目,在这个项目中,同事们探索了文学研究课程中的社会注释技术。在我们的课程中实施社会注释后,讲师们举行了圆桌讨论,收集了调查并进行了焦点小组访谈。基于Louise Rosenblatt的阅读和写作交易理论,我们对这些数据的解释表明,社会注释可以通过向学生展示如何走向审美阅读模式,帮助他们更有效地参与文学文本。此外,参与社会注释的学生理解其在文学研究中的应用,直接再现了罗森布拉特对文学解释的描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Something fruitful for all of us”: Social annotation as a signature pedagogy for literature education
New social annotation practices have the potential to become a “signature pedagogy” for educators in literary studies, because social annotation encapsulates both the expected learning outcomes and the underlying value commitments of literature education. We give an account of a project conducted by colleagues at the Education University of Hong Kong, during which colleagues explored social annotation technologies in literary studies courses. After implementing social annotation in our courses, instructors held roundtable discussions, collected surveys and conducted focus group interviews. Basing our interpretation of these data on Louise Rosenblatt’s transactional theory of reading and writing, we propose that social annotation can help students engage with literary texts more effectively by showing them how to move toward an aesthetic mode of reading. Students participating in social annotation, moreover, understood its application to literary studies in ways that directly reproduced Rosenblatt’s account of literary interpretation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arts and Humanities in Higher Education
Arts and Humanities in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Arts and Humanities in Higher Education seeks to: Publish high quality articles that bring critical research to the fore and stimulate debate. Serve the community of arts and humanities educators internationally, by publishing significant opinion and research into contemporary issues of teaching and learning within the domain. These will include enquiries into policy, the curriculum and appropriate forms of assessment, as well as developments in method such as electronic modes of scholarship and course delivery.
期刊最新文献
Design and evaluation of Enthralled: A higher education conversation game based on Euripides’ Bacchae Racial discourses and colonial education policy: The discursive construction of education development at a historically white South African university Mind the gap: A scoping review of skills gaps for graduates in the creative industries On the border between play and art: A collaborative self-study of 76 playful didactic designs in higher education Arts employability and extracurricular communities of practice: A case study of the University of Melbourne’s creative community connections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1