K-TIRADS、ACR-TIRADS、ATA在计算机辅助超声辅助甲状腺结节CAD诊断中的比较研究

Xiaoyu Li, Jinging Liu, Li-ping Liu, Wenwen Fan, Y. Xin, Yanping Shi
{"title":"K-TIRADS、ACR-TIRADS、ATA在计算机辅助超声辅助甲状腺结节CAD诊断中的比较研究","authors":"Xiaoyu Li, Jinging Liu, Li-ping Liu, Wenwen Fan, Y. Xin, Yanping Shi","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2019.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the diagnostic efficiency of K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS and ATA risk stratification in computer-aided detection and diagnosis(CAD) software and the application value of CAD-assisted ultrasound physicians in diagnosing thyroid nodules. \n \n \nMethods \nOne hundred and ninety-two thyroid nodules with postoperative pathological results were retrospectively analyzed. All of them were graded by K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS and ATA with CAD software, and the best guide was recognized by calculating the area under the ROC curve, sensitivity and specificity. Then, based on the best guidelines for the classification criteria, the double-blind method was used to compare the ability of the same ultrasonologist to diagnose thyroid nodules before and after CAD. \n \n \nResults \nThe AUC value of K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, ATA was 0.88, 0.77, 0.62 respectively in the CAD software. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the specificity between K-TIRADS and ATA(P=0.176), which were both higher than ACR-TIRADS with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The AUC value of the diagnosis among CAD itself, ultrasound physicians and physicians combined CAD was 0.88, 0.80, 0.93, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the sensitivity between CAD itself and physicians combined CAD(P=0.163), which were both higher than ultrasound physicians with statistical significant differences(P<0.05). Among ultrasound physicians, CAD itself and physicians combined CAD, the difference in specificity between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nAll the three risk stratification systems of thyroid ultrasound in CAD software have good diagnostic values, among which K-TIRADS has the largest AUC. The CAD software can assist ultrasound physicians to improve the thyroid nodule diagnostic performance, and has a good clinical application prospect. \n \n \nKey words: \nUltrasonography; Computer-aided dection and diagnosis; Thyroid nodules; K-TIRADS; ACR-TIRADS; ATA","PeriodicalId":10224,"journal":{"name":"中华超声影像学杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the comparison of diagnostic of K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS and ATA in CAD and diagnosis of thyroid nodules by computer-assisted ultrasonography\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyu Li, Jinging Liu, Li-ping Liu, Wenwen Fan, Y. Xin, Yanping Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2019.10.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo explore the diagnostic efficiency of K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS and ATA risk stratification in computer-aided detection and diagnosis(CAD) software and the application value of CAD-assisted ultrasound physicians in diagnosing thyroid nodules. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nOne hundred and ninety-two thyroid nodules with postoperative pathological results were retrospectively analyzed. All of them were graded by K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS and ATA with CAD software, and the best guide was recognized by calculating the area under the ROC curve, sensitivity and specificity. Then, based on the best guidelines for the classification criteria, the double-blind method was used to compare the ability of the same ultrasonologist to diagnose thyroid nodules before and after CAD. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe AUC value of K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, ATA was 0.88, 0.77, 0.62 respectively in the CAD software. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the specificity between K-TIRADS and ATA(P=0.176), which were both higher than ACR-TIRADS with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The AUC value of the diagnosis among CAD itself, ultrasound physicians and physicians combined CAD was 0.88, 0.80, 0.93, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the sensitivity between CAD itself and physicians combined CAD(P=0.163), which were both higher than ultrasound physicians with statistical significant differences(P<0.05). Among ultrasound physicians, CAD itself and physicians combined CAD, the difference in specificity between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nAll the three risk stratification systems of thyroid ultrasound in CAD software have good diagnostic values, among which K-TIRADS has the largest AUC. The CAD software can assist ultrasound physicians to improve the thyroid nodule diagnostic performance, and has a good clinical application prospect. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nUltrasonography; Computer-aided dection and diagnosis; Thyroid nodules; K-TIRADS; ACR-TIRADS; ATA\",\"PeriodicalId\":10224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华超声影像学杂志\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华超声影像学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2019.10.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华超声影像学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2019.10.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨计算机辅助检测与诊断(CAD)软件中K-TIRADS、ACR-TIRADS和ATA风险分层的诊断效率,以及CAD辅助超声医师诊断甲状腺结节的应用价值。方法回顾性分析192例甲状腺结节术后病理结果。采用CAD软件进行K-TIRADS、ACR-TIRADS、ATA评分,通过计算ROC曲线下面积、灵敏度、特异度来确定最佳指南。然后,根据最佳的分类标准指南,采用双盲法比较同一超声医师在CAD前后诊断甲状腺结节的能力。结果CAD软件中K-TIRADS、ACR-TIRADS、ATA的AUC值分别为0.88、0.77、0.62。两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。K-TIRADS与ATA特异性比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.176),均高于ACR-TIRADS,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。CAD本身、超声医师和医师联合CAD诊断的AUC值分别为0.88、0.80、0.93。两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。CAD本身与医师联合CAD的敏感性差异无统计学意义(P=0.163),均高于超声医师,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在超声医师、CAD本身医师和合并CAD医师中,两组特异性差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论CAD软件中甲状腺超声的3种风险分层系统均具有较好的诊断价值,其中K-TIRADS的AUC最大。该CAD软件可辅助超声医师提高甲状腺结节的诊断性能,具有良好的临床应用前景。关键词:超声检查;计算机辅助检测与诊断;甲状腺结节;K-TIRADS;ACR-TIRADS;ATA
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study on the comparison of diagnostic of K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS and ATA in CAD and diagnosis of thyroid nodules by computer-assisted ultrasonography
Objective To explore the diagnostic efficiency of K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS and ATA risk stratification in computer-aided detection and diagnosis(CAD) software and the application value of CAD-assisted ultrasound physicians in diagnosing thyroid nodules. Methods One hundred and ninety-two thyroid nodules with postoperative pathological results were retrospectively analyzed. All of them were graded by K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS and ATA with CAD software, and the best guide was recognized by calculating the area under the ROC curve, sensitivity and specificity. Then, based on the best guidelines for the classification criteria, the double-blind method was used to compare the ability of the same ultrasonologist to diagnose thyroid nodules before and after CAD. Results The AUC value of K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, ATA was 0.88, 0.77, 0.62 respectively in the CAD software. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the specificity between K-TIRADS and ATA(P=0.176), which were both higher than ACR-TIRADS with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The AUC value of the diagnosis among CAD itself, ultrasound physicians and physicians combined CAD was 0.88, 0.80, 0.93, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the sensitivity between CAD itself and physicians combined CAD(P=0.163), which were both higher than ultrasound physicians with statistical significant differences(P<0.05). Among ultrasound physicians, CAD itself and physicians combined CAD, the difference in specificity between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusions All the three risk stratification systems of thyroid ultrasound in CAD software have good diagnostic values, among which K-TIRADS has the largest AUC. The CAD software can assist ultrasound physicians to improve the thyroid nodule diagnostic performance, and has a good clinical application prospect. Key words: Ultrasonography; Computer-aided dection and diagnosis; Thyroid nodules; K-TIRADS; ACR-TIRADS; ATA
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华超声影像学杂志
中华超声影像学杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9126
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-guided pathological sampling of cadaver lung tissue in cases of COVID-19 Ultrasound-guided post-mortem tissue sampling in the autopsy of COVID-19 cases: a pilot study The clinical value of ultrasound in the assessment of the severity of COVID-19 Study of positioning of fetal conus medullaris by detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound Prenatal ultrasound diagnostic clues of congenital dislocation of the knee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1