分离主义冲突。南高加索、东欧和巴尔干(1991 - 2014)作者Loretta del aguzzo。罗马:卡罗奇出版社,2020年。190页,21欧元

C. Pala
{"title":"分离主义冲突。南高加索、东欧和巴尔干(1991 - 2014)作者Loretta del aguzzo。罗马:卡罗奇出版社,2020年。190页,21欧元","authors":"C. Pala","doi":"10.1017/ipo.2021.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political claims concerning state territorial transformation, secessionism and separatism still constitute a relatively understudied issue in political science. Scholars such as Radan (2012) have debated at length whether the study of separatism belongs more to International Relations or to domestic politics. Different scientific approaches seeking to analyse similar phenomena are sometimes rigidly framed by geographical area and local contexts (such as decolonization in Africa or pro-independence demands in Western Europe), with no or little regard for trans-national aspects. They may apply the same scientific concepts but fail to bridge epistemic diver-gences. Independentism, separatism, secessionism, annexationism, irredentism are striking examples of such an epistemic confusion. Moreover, scholars seldom contextualize these very different political phenomena, in spite of important regional and international contextual factors. Nonetheless, crucial issues comparative politics nations nationalism, regionalism, sub-state ethnic identities, regional/national culture and language, crucial explana-tory or intervening factors for understanding independentism and secessionism in general.","PeriodicalId":43368,"journal":{"name":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conflitti separatisti. Caucaso meridionale, Europa orientale e Balcani (1991–2014) By Loretta Dell'Aguzzo. Roma: Carocci editore, 2020. 190 p., 21 Euros\",\"authors\":\"C. Pala\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ipo.2021.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Political claims concerning state territorial transformation, secessionism and separatism still constitute a relatively understudied issue in political science. Scholars such as Radan (2012) have debated at length whether the study of separatism belongs more to International Relations or to domestic politics. Different scientific approaches seeking to analyse similar phenomena are sometimes rigidly framed by geographical area and local contexts (such as decolonization in Africa or pro-independence demands in Western Europe), with no or little regard for trans-national aspects. They may apply the same scientific concepts but fail to bridge epistemic diver-gences. Independentism, separatism, secessionism, annexationism, irredentism are striking examples of such an epistemic confusion. Moreover, scholars seldom contextualize these very different political phenomena, in spite of important regional and international contextual factors. Nonetheless, crucial issues comparative politics nations nationalism, regionalism, sub-state ethnic identities, regional/national culture and language, crucial explana-tory or intervening factors for understanding independentism and secessionism in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2021.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2021.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于国家领土转换、分裂主义和分离主义的政治主张,仍然是政治学研究相对不足的问题。Radan(2012)等学者对分离主义的研究是属于国际关系范畴还是属于国内政治范畴进行了详细的讨论。试图分析类似现象的不同科学方法有时受到地理区域和当地情况的严格限制(例如非洲的非殖民化或西欧的支持独立的要求),不考虑或很少考虑跨国方面。它们可能应用相同的科学概念,但无法弥合认识上的分歧。独立主义、分离主义、分离主义、兼并主义、统一主义就是这种认识混乱的显著例子。此外,尽管存在重要的区域和国际语境因素,学者们很少将这些截然不同的政治现象置于语境之中。然而,比较政治的关键问题是民族民族主义,地区主义,次国家民族认同,区域/民族文化和语言,理解独立主义和分离主义的关键解释或干预因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conflitti separatisti. Caucaso meridionale, Europa orientale e Balcani (1991–2014) By Loretta Dell'Aguzzo. Roma: Carocci editore, 2020. 190 p., 21 Euros
Political claims concerning state territorial transformation, secessionism and separatism still constitute a relatively understudied issue in political science. Scholars such as Radan (2012) have debated at length whether the study of separatism belongs more to International Relations or to domestic politics. Different scientific approaches seeking to analyse similar phenomena are sometimes rigidly framed by geographical area and local contexts (such as decolonization in Africa or pro-independence demands in Western Europe), with no or little regard for trans-national aspects. They may apply the same scientific concepts but fail to bridge epistemic diver-gences. Independentism, separatism, secessionism, annexationism, irredentism are striking examples of such an epistemic confusion. Moreover, scholars seldom contextualize these very different political phenomena, in spite of important regional and international contextual factors. Nonetheless, crucial issues comparative politics nations nationalism, regionalism, sub-state ethnic identities, regional/national culture and language, crucial explana-tory or intervening factors for understanding independentism and secessionism in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Economic voting goes local: evidence from the Italian regions Did the citizenship income scheme do it? The supposed electoral consequence of a flagship policy IPO volume 53 issue 3 Cover and Front matter IPO volume 53 issue 3 Cover and Back matter Precarious work and challenger parties: how precarity influenced vote choice in the 2018 Italian election
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1