相同,相同,但不同…?公共部门创新实验室在理论和实践上的出现

Peter Meister Broekema, Elisabeth Bulder, L. Horlings
{"title":"相同,相同,但不同…?公共部门创新实验室在理论和实践上的出现","authors":"Peter Meister Broekema, Elisabeth Bulder, L. Horlings","doi":"10.2478/mmcks-2022-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract At first glance, Public Sector Innovation (PSI) Labs are gaining prominence within academic literature, the European Union (EU) and beyond. However, because of the relative newness and conceptual ambiguity of this concept, the exact contribution of these labs to theory and practice is still unclear. In addition, most research has been looking at case studies. This publication breaks new ground by elaborating on the concept and also by looking at the perception of these labs in different contexts, by comparing multiple labs in multiple countries. In doing so, we raised the question: ‘What is the perceived added value of Public Sector Innovation labs for further developing theory as well as for society?’ In order to answer this question, by way of an experiment, we combined theoretical research together with focus groups with members of the EU funded project Multi Disciplinary Innovation for Social Change (SHIINE) in combination with questionnaires to selected PSI labs, thus providing us with rich data. Our experimental methodology uncovered a conceptual bias that is probably existent in similar studies and needs to be acknowledged more. In addition, we found that PSI labs have developed over time into an amalgam of two competing concepts. To conclude, we believe that the specific potential of PSI labs as an internal space for innovation within institutions is underutilised. We believe this could be improved by acknowledging the specific aim of PSI labs in a co-creative setting between relevant stakeholders, such as Higher Education Institutions (HEIs).","PeriodicalId":30072,"journal":{"name":"Management Marketing","volume":"17 1","pages":"344 - 363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Same same, but different…? The emergence of Public Sector Innovation Labs in theory and practice\",\"authors\":\"Peter Meister Broekema, Elisabeth Bulder, L. Horlings\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/mmcks-2022-0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract At first glance, Public Sector Innovation (PSI) Labs are gaining prominence within academic literature, the European Union (EU) and beyond. However, because of the relative newness and conceptual ambiguity of this concept, the exact contribution of these labs to theory and practice is still unclear. In addition, most research has been looking at case studies. This publication breaks new ground by elaborating on the concept and also by looking at the perception of these labs in different contexts, by comparing multiple labs in multiple countries. In doing so, we raised the question: ‘What is the perceived added value of Public Sector Innovation labs for further developing theory as well as for society?’ In order to answer this question, by way of an experiment, we combined theoretical research together with focus groups with members of the EU funded project Multi Disciplinary Innovation for Social Change (SHIINE) in combination with questionnaires to selected PSI labs, thus providing us with rich data. Our experimental methodology uncovered a conceptual bias that is probably existent in similar studies and needs to be acknowledged more. In addition, we found that PSI labs have developed over time into an amalgam of two competing concepts. To conclude, we believe that the specific potential of PSI labs as an internal space for innovation within institutions is underutilised. We believe this could be improved by acknowledging the specific aim of PSI labs in a co-creative setting between relevant stakeholders, such as Higher Education Institutions (HEIs).\",\"PeriodicalId\":30072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Marketing\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"344 - 363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要乍一看,公共部门创新(PSI)实验室在学术文献、欧盟(EU)和其他国家越来越突出。然而,由于这一概念的相对新颖性和概念的模糊性,这些实验室对理论和实践的确切贡献尚不清楚。此外,大多数研究都着眼于案例研究。本出版物通过详细阐述这一概念,并通过比较多个国家的多个实验室,审视不同背景下对这些实验室的看法,开辟了新的天地。在这样做的过程中,我们提出了一个问题:“公共部门创新实验室对进一步发展理论和社会的附加值是多少?”为了回答这个问题,我们通过实验的方式,将理论研究与欧盟资助的社会变革多学科创新项目(SHIINE)成员的焦点小组结合起来,并对选定的PSI实验室进行问卷调查,从而为我们提供了丰富的数据。我们的实验方法揭示了类似研究中可能存在的概念偏见,需要更多地承认。此外,我们发现PSI实验室随着时间的推移已经发展成为两个相互竞争的概念的混合体。总之,我们认为PSI实验室作为机构内部创新空间的具体潜力没有得到充分利用。我们认为,可以通过承认PSI实验室在相关利益相关者(如高等教育机构)之间的共同创造环境中的具体目标来改善这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Same same, but different…? The emergence of Public Sector Innovation Labs in theory and practice
Abstract At first glance, Public Sector Innovation (PSI) Labs are gaining prominence within academic literature, the European Union (EU) and beyond. However, because of the relative newness and conceptual ambiguity of this concept, the exact contribution of these labs to theory and practice is still unclear. In addition, most research has been looking at case studies. This publication breaks new ground by elaborating on the concept and also by looking at the perception of these labs in different contexts, by comparing multiple labs in multiple countries. In doing so, we raised the question: ‘What is the perceived added value of Public Sector Innovation labs for further developing theory as well as for society?’ In order to answer this question, by way of an experiment, we combined theoretical research together with focus groups with members of the EU funded project Multi Disciplinary Innovation for Social Change (SHIINE) in combination with questionnaires to selected PSI labs, thus providing us with rich data. Our experimental methodology uncovered a conceptual bias that is probably existent in similar studies and needs to be acknowledged more. In addition, we found that PSI labs have developed over time into an amalgam of two competing concepts. To conclude, we believe that the specific potential of PSI labs as an internal space for innovation within institutions is underutilised. We believe this could be improved by acknowledging the specific aim of PSI labs in a co-creative setting between relevant stakeholders, such as Higher Education Institutions (HEIs).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Wellness Tourism Management Research A bibliometric analysis Emotional and cultural intelligences: a comparative analysis between the United States of America and Romania The impact of quality of C2C online store on consumer satisfaction: an empirical study in Lithuania Digital marketing adoption of microenterprises in a technology acceptance approach Exposure of valenced fake news frames to country brand equity and the role of news credibility in this process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1