{"title":"老年友好型社区倡议研究:评估和推进","authors":"Amanda J. Lehning, E. Greenfield","doi":"10.1080/02763893.2017.1309937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Age-friendly community initiatives (AFCIs) are a promising approach to supporting physical, cognitive, mental, and social health in later life, but to date, there are gaps in our understanding of these initiatives' development, implementation, sustainability, and effectiveness. In this article we describe existing scholarship on age-friendly community initiatives, focusing attention on conceptual and empirical knowledge development regarding what age-friendliness and AFCIs are, as well as AFCIs' inputs (i.e., the process of age-friendly community change), outputs (i.e., organizational and community changes), and outcomes (i.e., changes in individual older adults). We then discuss some of the barriers to integrating research and practice in this field, including AFCIs' multifaceted approach and limited funding for evaluation and research. We conclude with steps to advance knowledge that can help to promote more evidence-informed age-friendly policies and practices. Additional scholarship regarding what change processes work under what conditions, in what ways, and for whom is essential to supporting the systematic development of community-wide approaches to promote the health and well-being of older adults.","PeriodicalId":46221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing for the Elderly","volume":"31 1","pages":"178 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309937","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on Age-Friendly Community Initiatives: Taking Stock and Moving Forward\",\"authors\":\"Amanda J. Lehning, E. Greenfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02763893.2017.1309937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Age-friendly community initiatives (AFCIs) are a promising approach to supporting physical, cognitive, mental, and social health in later life, but to date, there are gaps in our understanding of these initiatives' development, implementation, sustainability, and effectiveness. In this article we describe existing scholarship on age-friendly community initiatives, focusing attention on conceptual and empirical knowledge development regarding what age-friendliness and AFCIs are, as well as AFCIs' inputs (i.e., the process of age-friendly community change), outputs (i.e., organizational and community changes), and outcomes (i.e., changes in individual older adults). We then discuss some of the barriers to integrating research and practice in this field, including AFCIs' multifaceted approach and limited funding for evaluation and research. We conclude with steps to advance knowledge that can help to promote more evidence-informed age-friendly policies and practices. Additional scholarship regarding what change processes work under what conditions, in what ways, and for whom is essential to supporting the systematic development of community-wide approaches to promote the health and well-being of older adults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Housing for the Elderly\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"178 - 192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309937\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Housing for the Elderly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Housing for the Elderly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Research on Age-Friendly Community Initiatives: Taking Stock and Moving Forward
ABSTRACT Age-friendly community initiatives (AFCIs) are a promising approach to supporting physical, cognitive, mental, and social health in later life, but to date, there are gaps in our understanding of these initiatives' development, implementation, sustainability, and effectiveness. In this article we describe existing scholarship on age-friendly community initiatives, focusing attention on conceptual and empirical knowledge development regarding what age-friendliness and AFCIs are, as well as AFCIs' inputs (i.e., the process of age-friendly community change), outputs (i.e., organizational and community changes), and outcomes (i.e., changes in individual older adults). We then discuss some of the barriers to integrating research and practice in this field, including AFCIs' multifaceted approach and limited funding for evaluation and research. We conclude with steps to advance knowledge that can help to promote more evidence-informed age-friendly policies and practices. Additional scholarship regarding what change processes work under what conditions, in what ways, and for whom is essential to supporting the systematic development of community-wide approaches to promote the health and well-being of older adults.
期刊介绍:
Housing is more than houses-it is the foundation upon which the essentials of life are anchored. The quality of housing can enhance or diminish the well-being of individuals and families as well as that of the entire community. Before the Journal of Housing for the Elderly, housing for the elderly as a subject area has a relatively brief history. The Journal of Housing for the Elderly aims to serve the needs of gerontological professionals in the fields of architecture and housing, urban planning, and public policy who are responsible for the residential environments of the elderly in the community.