{"title":"颈旁阻滞在低资源环境下进行手动真空抽吸(MVA)的有效性和安全性","authors":"Nafisa Jesmin","doi":"10.3329/BJOG.V31I2.34213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective (s): To determine the safety and effectiveness of para-cervical block for cervical dilatation and uterine evacuation by MVA. Materials and methods: This descriptive (cross-sectional) study was conducted in a low resource set-up at Homna, Upzilla Health Complex Comilla between January 2016 and June 2016. Forty five patients of 1 st trimester incomplete abortion of 12 weeks gestation were the target population for manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) for this study. All patients received para cervical block before MVA procedure. Three minutes after application of block, suction and evacuation of uterus was done. Perioperative oral analgesic (Ibuprofen) and anxiolytic (diazepam) were used 30 minutes before procedure in all patients. Before the procedure, all the women were asked to evaluate the level of pain on a visual analog scale ranged from 0-10. Thirty minutes after the procedure, the patient was asked to describe the pain that she had been feeling during MVA by using the same visual analog scale. Visual analog scale was described by: no pain (0 points), slight pain (1-3 points), moderate pain (4-6 points) and severe pain (7-10 points). Patients were followed up for 7 days and were evaluated for complications before leaving the facility and on the 7th day after procedure. A routine USG of lower abdomen was done on 7 th post-evacuation day in all patients, which revealed completeness of the procedure. Informed consent was taken from all the patients. Results: All were first trimester incomplete abortion cases. MVA was performed with para cervical block. Para cervical block reduced pain sensation on cervical dilatation. According to VAS 30 (66.67%) patients had mild pain, 3(6.67%) patients had moderate pain and 12(26.67%) patients had no pain during the procedure. Six (13.33%) patients had mild pain and others had no pain after the procedure. There was no severe pain before or after the procedure. Thirty (75.56%) patients discharged before 4 hours and 11 (24.44%) patients discharged after 4 hours of the procedure. No patients had any complications like pervaginal bleeding, infection or retention of product. The cost was minimum and patients satisfaction was high. Conclusion: Paracevical block is effective in reducing pain sensation during MVA with a reasonable cost of the procedure. Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2016; Vol. 31(2) : 70-74","PeriodicalId":39936,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"31 1","pages":"70-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/BJOG.V31I2.34213","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Para Cervical Block in Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) - in Low Resource Setting\",\"authors\":\"Nafisa Jesmin\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/BJOG.V31I2.34213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective (s): To determine the safety and effectiveness of para-cervical block for cervical dilatation and uterine evacuation by MVA. Materials and methods: This descriptive (cross-sectional) study was conducted in a low resource set-up at Homna, Upzilla Health Complex Comilla between January 2016 and June 2016. Forty five patients of 1 st trimester incomplete abortion of 12 weeks gestation were the target population for manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) for this study. All patients received para cervical block before MVA procedure. Three minutes after application of block, suction and evacuation of uterus was done. Perioperative oral analgesic (Ibuprofen) and anxiolytic (diazepam) were used 30 minutes before procedure in all patients. Before the procedure, all the women were asked to evaluate the level of pain on a visual analog scale ranged from 0-10. Thirty minutes after the procedure, the patient was asked to describe the pain that she had been feeling during MVA by using the same visual analog scale. Visual analog scale was described by: no pain (0 points), slight pain (1-3 points), moderate pain (4-6 points) and severe pain (7-10 points). Patients were followed up for 7 days and were evaluated for complications before leaving the facility and on the 7th day after procedure. A routine USG of lower abdomen was done on 7 th post-evacuation day in all patients, which revealed completeness of the procedure. Informed consent was taken from all the patients. Results: All were first trimester incomplete abortion cases. MVA was performed with para cervical block. Para cervical block reduced pain sensation on cervical dilatation. According to VAS 30 (66.67%) patients had mild pain, 3(6.67%) patients had moderate pain and 12(26.67%) patients had no pain during the procedure. Six (13.33%) patients had mild pain and others had no pain after the procedure. There was no severe pain before or after the procedure. Thirty (75.56%) patients discharged before 4 hours and 11 (24.44%) patients discharged after 4 hours of the procedure. No patients had any complications like pervaginal bleeding, infection or retention of product. The cost was minimum and patients satisfaction was high. Conclusion: Paracevical block is effective in reducing pain sensation during MVA with a reasonable cost of the procedure. Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2016; Vol. 31(2) : 70-74\",\"PeriodicalId\":39936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"70-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/BJOG.V31I2.34213\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/BJOG.V31I2.34213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/BJOG.V31I2.34213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:确定颈旁阻滞用于MVA宫颈扩张和子宫排空的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:这项描述性(横断面)研究于2016年1月至2016年6月在科米拉Upzilla Health Complex Homna的低资源环境中进行。本研究的目标人群为45名妊娠12周的第1个妊娠期不完全流产患者。所有患者在MVA手术前均接受颈旁阻滞。应用阻滞后3分钟,进行子宫抽吸和排空。所有患者在手术前30分钟使用围术期口服镇痛药(布洛芬)和抗焦虑药(地西泮)。手术前,所有女性都被要求在0-10的视觉模拟量表上评估疼痛程度。手术后30分钟,患者被要求使用相同的视觉模拟量表描述她在MVA期间感受到的疼痛。视觉模拟量表描述为:无疼痛(0分)、轻度疼痛(1-3分)、中度疼痛(4-6分)和重度疼痛(7-10分)。患者接受了7天的随访,并在离开设施前和手术后第7天评估并发症。所有患者在撤离后第7天进行了下腹部常规USG检查,结果表明手术是完整的。所有患者均取得知情同意书。结果:均为妊娠早期不完全流产病例。MVA采用颈旁阻滞。宫颈旁阻滞可减轻扩张术后的疼痛感。根据VAS评分,30名(66.67%)患者有轻度疼痛,3名(6.67%)患者有中度疼痛,12名(26.67%)患者在手术过程中没有疼痛。6名(13.33%)患者在手术后有轻微疼痛,其他患者没有疼痛。手术前后均未出现剧烈疼痛。30名(75.56%)患者在4小时前出院,11名(24.44%)患者在手术4小时后出院。没有患者出现任何并发症,如经阴道出血、感染或产品滞留。费用最低,患者满意度高。结论:颈旁阻滞能有效减轻MVA患者的疼痛感,手术费用合理。孟加拉国妇产科杂志,2016;第31卷(2):70-74
Efficacy and Safety of Para Cervical Block in Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) - in Low Resource Setting
Objective (s): To determine the safety and effectiveness of para-cervical block for cervical dilatation and uterine evacuation by MVA. Materials and methods: This descriptive (cross-sectional) study was conducted in a low resource set-up at Homna, Upzilla Health Complex Comilla between January 2016 and June 2016. Forty five patients of 1 st trimester incomplete abortion of 12 weeks gestation were the target population for manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) for this study. All patients received para cervical block before MVA procedure. Three minutes after application of block, suction and evacuation of uterus was done. Perioperative oral analgesic (Ibuprofen) and anxiolytic (diazepam) were used 30 minutes before procedure in all patients. Before the procedure, all the women were asked to evaluate the level of pain on a visual analog scale ranged from 0-10. Thirty minutes after the procedure, the patient was asked to describe the pain that she had been feeling during MVA by using the same visual analog scale. Visual analog scale was described by: no pain (0 points), slight pain (1-3 points), moderate pain (4-6 points) and severe pain (7-10 points). Patients were followed up for 7 days and were evaluated for complications before leaving the facility and on the 7th day after procedure. A routine USG of lower abdomen was done on 7 th post-evacuation day in all patients, which revealed completeness of the procedure. Informed consent was taken from all the patients. Results: All were first trimester incomplete abortion cases. MVA was performed with para cervical block. Para cervical block reduced pain sensation on cervical dilatation. According to VAS 30 (66.67%) patients had mild pain, 3(6.67%) patients had moderate pain and 12(26.67%) patients had no pain during the procedure. Six (13.33%) patients had mild pain and others had no pain after the procedure. There was no severe pain before or after the procedure. Thirty (75.56%) patients discharged before 4 hours and 11 (24.44%) patients discharged after 4 hours of the procedure. No patients had any complications like pervaginal bleeding, infection or retention of product. The cost was minimum and patients satisfaction was high. Conclusion: Paracevical block is effective in reducing pain sensation during MVA with a reasonable cost of the procedure. Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2016; Vol. 31(2) : 70-74
期刊介绍:
Bangladesh Journals OnLine (BanglaJOL) is a service to provide access to Bangladesh published research, and increase worldwide knowledge of indigenous scholarship