组织社交媒体使用与社区社会资本:贫困和种族构成的差异

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Poverty Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI:10.1080/10875549.2022.2080030
Michelle M. Livermore, Monazil Chowdhury, Gerald Baumgartner, Jahraya Jeanlouis
{"title":"组织社交媒体使用与社区社会资本:贫困和种族构成的差异","authors":"Michelle M. Livermore, Monazil Chowdhury, Gerald Baumgartner, Jahraya Jeanlouis","doi":"10.1080/10875549.2022.2080030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Organizations play an essential role in solving community problems and social media facilitates their efforts. This paper illustrates an approach to using the social media data of organizations to observe community-level social capital unobtrusively by comparing communities that differ by racial composition and poverty. Data from the IRS, US Census Bureau, and social media platforms revealed that most nonprofit organizations in a mid-sized city in the South have a social media presence, with Facebook substantially more prevalent than Instagram or Twitter. Disparities based on community poverty and race emerged. Exceptions and implications for practice and future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46177,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Poverty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational Social Media Use and Community Social Capital: Disparities by Poverty and Racial Composition\",\"authors\":\"Michelle M. Livermore, Monazil Chowdhury, Gerald Baumgartner, Jahraya Jeanlouis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10875549.2022.2080030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Organizations play an essential role in solving community problems and social media facilitates their efforts. This paper illustrates an approach to using the social media data of organizations to observe community-level social capital unobtrusively by comparing communities that differ by racial composition and poverty. Data from the IRS, US Census Bureau, and social media platforms revealed that most nonprofit organizations in a mid-sized city in the South have a social media presence, with Facebook substantially more prevalent than Instagram or Twitter. Disparities based on community poverty and race emerged. Exceptions and implications for practice and future research are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Poverty\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Poverty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2022.2080030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2022.2080030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要组织在解决社区问题方面发挥着重要作用,社交媒体为他们的努力提供了便利。本文阐述了一种利用组织的社交媒体数据,通过比较因种族构成和贫困而不同的社区,不引人注目地观察社区层面的社会资本的方法。来自美国国税局、美国人口普查局和社交媒体平台的数据显示,南部中等城市的大多数非营利组织都有社交媒体,脸书比Instagram或推特更受欢迎。出现了基于社区贫困和种族的差异。讨论了例外情况以及对实践和未来研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Organizational Social Media Use and Community Social Capital: Disparities by Poverty and Racial Composition
ABSTRACT Organizations play an essential role in solving community problems and social media facilitates their efforts. This paper illustrates an approach to using the social media data of organizations to observe community-level social capital unobtrusively by comparing communities that differ by racial composition and poverty. Data from the IRS, US Census Bureau, and social media platforms revealed that most nonprofit organizations in a mid-sized city in the South have a social media presence, with Facebook substantially more prevalent than Instagram or Twitter. Disparities based on community poverty and race emerged. Exceptions and implications for practice and future research are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Poverty
Journal of Poverty SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Poverty is the first refereed journal to recognize the inequalities in our social, political, and economic structures, presenting progressing strategies that expand society"s increasingly narrow notions of poverty and inequality. The journal"s broad understanding of poverty—more inclusive than the traditional view—keeps the focus on people"s need for education, employment, safe and affordable housing, nutrition, and adequate medical care, and on interventions that range from direct practice to community organization to social policy analysis. The journal"s articles will increase your knowledge and awareness of oppressive forces such as racism, sexism, classism, and homophobia that contribute to the maintenance of poverty and inequality.
期刊最新文献
Unwrapped Voices: Thematic Mapping of Consumer Behavior at the Bottom of the Pyramid Analyzing the Influence of International Remittances on Multidimensional Poverty: Insights from BRI Countries Multidimensional Poverty and Local Governance: Analysis Through Systematic Review of the Literature How Does Poverty Affect Primary School Achievement in Bangladeshi Children?The Mediating Role of Parental Investment and Parenting Practice From Service to Struggle: Exploring the Link Between Service-Connected Disability and Poverty Among Veteran Households
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1