新冠肺炎:民族主义与全球团结

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik Pub Date : 2021-06-22 DOI:10.20473/mkp.V34I32021.261-271
Fadhila Inas Pratiwi, Ahalla Tsauro
{"title":"新冠肺炎:民族主义与全球团结","authors":"Fadhila Inas Pratiwi, Ahalla Tsauro","doi":"10.20473/mkp.V34I32021.261-271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the COVID-19 crisis emerged, many forms of nationalism have been rising, such as racism, state individualism, vaccine nationalism, and so forth. However, this kind of nationalism cannot solve the global pandemic that affects various aspects of human life that needs global solidarity in the framework of thinking. The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between COVID-19, nationalism, and global solidarity. This article used the literature review method to compare and contrast the COVID-19, Nationalism, and Global Solidarity arguments by using reputable resources such as journals, research reports, and news articles. This article was divided into three sections: 1) the explanation about nationalism, its definition, and theoretical approach, 2) state and nationalism in crisis time, 3) cooperation and global solidarity. It concluded that the COVID-19 period showed us people tend to have greater individuality and higher attachment to their groups and state, as Social Identity Theory (SIT) suggests. It manifested in state nationalist view that state as the sole player in mitigating this pandemic shows selfish attitude. However, as the COVID-19 served as a global pandemic, it also needs global solidarity which has been proven in solving the spread of coronavirus and tackle its impact.","PeriodicalId":55930,"journal":{"name":"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19: Nationalism and global solidarities\",\"authors\":\"Fadhila Inas Pratiwi, Ahalla Tsauro\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/mkp.V34I32021.261-271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the COVID-19 crisis emerged, many forms of nationalism have been rising, such as racism, state individualism, vaccine nationalism, and so forth. However, this kind of nationalism cannot solve the global pandemic that affects various aspects of human life that needs global solidarity in the framework of thinking. The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between COVID-19, nationalism, and global solidarity. This article used the literature review method to compare and contrast the COVID-19, Nationalism, and Global Solidarity arguments by using reputable resources such as journals, research reports, and news articles. This article was divided into three sections: 1) the explanation about nationalism, its definition, and theoretical approach, 2) state and nationalism in crisis time, 3) cooperation and global solidarity. It concluded that the COVID-19 period showed us people tend to have greater individuality and higher attachment to their groups and state, as Social Identity Theory (SIT) suggests. It manifested in state nationalist view that state as the sole player in mitigating this pandemic shows selfish attitude. However, as the COVID-19 served as a global pandemic, it also needs global solidarity which has been proven in solving the spread of coronavirus and tackle its impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V34I32021.261-271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V34I32021.261-271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着新冠肺炎危机的出现,许多形式的民族主义正在抬头,如种族主义、国家个人主义、疫苗民族主义等等。然而,这种民族主义无法解决影响人类生活各个方面的全球流行病,需要在思维框架内实现全球团结。本文旨在探讨新冠肺炎、民族主义和全球团结之间的关系。本文采用文献综述法,利用期刊、研究报告和新闻文章等知名资源,对新冠肺炎、民族主义和全球团结的论点进行了比较和对比。本文分为三个部分:1)民族主义的解释、定义和理论方法;2)危机时期的国家与民族主义;3)合作与全球团结。它得出的结论是,新冠肺炎时期向我们表明,正如社会认同理论(SIT)所表明的那样,人们往往对自己的群体和国家有更大的个性和更高的依恋。这体现在国家民族主义观点中,即国家作为缓解疫情的唯一参与者表现出自私的态度。然而,随着新冠肺炎成为一场全球大流行,它也需要全球团结,这在解决冠状病毒的传播和应对其影响方面已得到证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19: Nationalism and global solidarities
As the COVID-19 crisis emerged, many forms of nationalism have been rising, such as racism, state individualism, vaccine nationalism, and so forth. However, this kind of nationalism cannot solve the global pandemic that affects various aspects of human life that needs global solidarity in the framework of thinking. The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between COVID-19, nationalism, and global solidarity. This article used the literature review method to compare and contrast the COVID-19, Nationalism, and Global Solidarity arguments by using reputable resources such as journals, research reports, and news articles. This article was divided into three sections: 1) the explanation about nationalism, its definition, and theoretical approach, 2) state and nationalism in crisis time, 3) cooperation and global solidarity. It concluded that the COVID-19 period showed us people tend to have greater individuality and higher attachment to their groups and state, as Social Identity Theory (SIT) suggests. It manifested in state nationalist view that state as the sole player in mitigating this pandemic shows selfish attitude. However, as the COVID-19 served as a global pandemic, it also needs global solidarity which has been proven in solving the spread of coronavirus and tackle its impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik
Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Integrated handling to overcome stunting in rural areas in East Java, Indonesia Agrarian conflict and split recognition: The middle way for recognition of the Mapur Bangka Tribe in Indonesia The dichotomy of electoral choice in fragmented societies: Prospects of 2023 Nigerian general elections The paradox of special autonomy: Why does wealth make Papua poor? Political confrontations and disagreements in the Nigerian Government’s COVID-19 response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1