母语阅读方向对二语知觉广度的影响:一项针对印地语和乌尔都语使用者的眼动追踪研究

IF 1.9 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Second Language Research Pub Date : 2021-10-08 DOI:10.1177/02676583211049742
Leigh B. Fernandez, Ricarda Bothe, Shanley EM Allen
{"title":"母语阅读方向对二语知觉广度的影响:一项针对印地语和乌尔都语使用者的眼动追踪研究","authors":"Leigh B. Fernandez, Ricarda Bothe, Shanley EM Allen","doi":"10.1177/02676583211049742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current study we used the gaze-contingent moving window paradigm to directly compare the second language (L2) English perceptual span of two groups that speak languages with essentially the same lexicon and grammar but crucially with different writing directions (and scripts): Hindi (read left to right) and Urdu (read right to left). This is the first study to directly compare first language (L1) speakers of languages that differ primarily in reading direction in a common L2, English. While Urdu speakers had a slightly faster reading rate, we found no additional differences between Hindi and Urdu speakers when reading L2 English; both groups showed a perceptual span between 9 and 11 characters to the right of the fixation based on saccade length. This suggests little to no influence of L1 reading direction on L2 perceptual span, but rather that L2 perceptual span is influenced by allocation of attention during reading. Our data are in line with research by Leung et al. (2014) finding that L2 speakers have a smaller perceptual span than native speakers (L1 perceptual span is approximately 15 characters to the right of the fixation). This most likely stems from the increased demands associated with reading in a second language, which led to a reduction in the amount of attention that can be allocated outside of the current fixation.","PeriodicalId":47414,"journal":{"name":"Second Language Research","volume":"39 1","pages":"447 - 469"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of L1 reading direction on L2 perceptual span: An eye-tracking study investigating Hindi and Urdu speakers\",\"authors\":\"Leigh B. Fernandez, Ricarda Bothe, Shanley EM Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02676583211049742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the current study we used the gaze-contingent moving window paradigm to directly compare the second language (L2) English perceptual span of two groups that speak languages with essentially the same lexicon and grammar but crucially with different writing directions (and scripts): Hindi (read left to right) and Urdu (read right to left). This is the first study to directly compare first language (L1) speakers of languages that differ primarily in reading direction in a common L2, English. While Urdu speakers had a slightly faster reading rate, we found no additional differences between Hindi and Urdu speakers when reading L2 English; both groups showed a perceptual span between 9 and 11 characters to the right of the fixation based on saccade length. This suggests little to no influence of L1 reading direction on L2 perceptual span, but rather that L2 perceptual span is influenced by allocation of attention during reading. Our data are in line with research by Leung et al. (2014) finding that L2 speakers have a smaller perceptual span than native speakers (L1 perceptual span is approximately 15 characters to the right of the fixation). This most likely stems from the increased demands associated with reading in a second language, which led to a reduction in the amount of attention that can be allocated outside of the current fixation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Second Language Research\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"447 - 469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Second Language Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583211049742\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Second Language Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583211049742","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在当前的研究中,我们使用了注视条件移动窗口范式来直接比较两组语言(印地语(从左向右阅读)和乌尔都语(从右向左阅读)的第二语言(L2)英语感知广度,这两组语言的词汇和语法基本相同,但关键是书写方向(和脚本)不同。这是第一个直接比较母语(L1)使用者在共同的第二语言(英语)中阅读方向主要不同的语言的研究。虽然说乌尔都语的人的阅读速度略快,但我们发现印地语和乌尔都语的人在阅读第二语言英语时没有额外的差异;根据扫视长度,两组的感知广度都在注视点右侧9到11个字符之间。这表明母语阅读方向对二语知觉广度的影响很小或没有影响,而是二语知觉广度受到阅读过程中注意分配的影响。我们的数据与Leung等人(2014)的研究一致,他们发现第二语言使用者的感知广度比母语使用者小(L1感知广度大约是注视点右侧的15个字符)。这很可能源于与第二语言阅读相关的需求增加,这导致可以分配到当前注视之外的注意力减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of L1 reading direction on L2 perceptual span: An eye-tracking study investigating Hindi and Urdu speakers
In the current study we used the gaze-contingent moving window paradigm to directly compare the second language (L2) English perceptual span of two groups that speak languages with essentially the same lexicon and grammar but crucially with different writing directions (and scripts): Hindi (read left to right) and Urdu (read right to left). This is the first study to directly compare first language (L1) speakers of languages that differ primarily in reading direction in a common L2, English. While Urdu speakers had a slightly faster reading rate, we found no additional differences between Hindi and Urdu speakers when reading L2 English; both groups showed a perceptual span between 9 and 11 characters to the right of the fixation based on saccade length. This suggests little to no influence of L1 reading direction on L2 perceptual span, but rather that L2 perceptual span is influenced by allocation of attention during reading. Our data are in line with research by Leung et al. (2014) finding that L2 speakers have a smaller perceptual span than native speakers (L1 perceptual span is approximately 15 characters to the right of the fixation). This most likely stems from the increased demands associated with reading in a second language, which led to a reduction in the amount of attention that can be allocated outside of the current fixation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Second Language Research is a high quality international peer reviewed journal, currently ranked in the top 20 journals in its field by Thomson Scientific (formerly ISI). SLR publishes theoretical and experimental papers concerned with second language acquisition and second language performance, and adheres to a rigorous double-blind reviewing policy in which the identity of both the reviewer and author are always concealed from both parties.
期刊最新文献
Learning to predict: Second language perception of reduced multi-word sequences High is good enough: Gender agreement and relative clause attachment in L2 auditory processing Complex dynamic systems theory as a foundation for process-oriented research on second language development The relationship between L2 learners’ production and perception of English vowels: The role of native-speaker acoustic patterns in production The effect of second-language learning experience on Korean listeners’ use of pitch cues in the perception of Cantonese tones
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1