乌干达计划生育利用的家庭福利视角

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIOLOGY African Sociological Review Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI:10.57054/asr.v26i1.3977
Phionah Namuliira, Razack B. Lokina, Innocent Pantaleo
{"title":"乌干达计划生育利用的家庭福利视角","authors":"Phionah Namuliira, Razack B. Lokina, Innocent Pantaleo","doi":"10.57054/asr.v26i1.3977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rationale for FP use has changed over time to progressively emphasize poverty reduction and welfare improvements. However, literature hasn’t largely matched this change. This study, therefore, sought to contribute to this knowledge gap by exploring the impact of FP on household welfare using consumption per adult equivalent as the measure of household welfare. Data from the Uganda National Panel Survey 2018/19 and 2019/20 waves was used, and the analysis was done using pooled ordinary least squares. Results revealed that fewer male headed households and more of the women not using FP were poor as compared to their counterparts. Results also indicated FP use to increase household welfare by 6.4% among all households. This increase is however more significant for rural women. The results thus indicate the potential of using FP to bridge the rural-urban divide.","PeriodicalId":43163,"journal":{"name":"African Sociological Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household welfare perspective of family planning utilization in Uganda\",\"authors\":\"Phionah Namuliira, Razack B. Lokina, Innocent Pantaleo\",\"doi\":\"10.57054/asr.v26i1.3977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rationale for FP use has changed over time to progressively emphasize poverty reduction and welfare improvements. However, literature hasn’t largely matched this change. This study, therefore, sought to contribute to this knowledge gap by exploring the impact of FP on household welfare using consumption per adult equivalent as the measure of household welfare. Data from the Uganda National Panel Survey 2018/19 and 2019/20 waves was used, and the analysis was done using pooled ordinary least squares. Results revealed that fewer male headed households and more of the women not using FP were poor as compared to their counterparts. Results also indicated FP use to increase household welfare by 6.4% among all households. This increase is however more significant for rural women. The results thus indicate the potential of using FP to bridge the rural-urban divide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Sociological Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Sociological Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57054/asr.v26i1.3977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57054/asr.v26i1.3977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计划生育使用的基本原理随着时间的推移发生了变化,逐渐强调减少贫困和改善福利。然而,文学并没有在很大程度上与这种变化相匹配。因此,本研究试图通过探索计划生育对家庭福利的影响来弥补这一知识差距,使用人均成人消费当量作为家庭福利的衡量标准。使用了乌干达国家小组调查2018/19和2019/20波的数据,并使用合并普通最小二乘进行了分析。结果显示,与其他家庭相比,较少的男性户主家庭和更多不使用计划生育的妇女贫穷。结果还表明,在所有家庭中,使用计划生育使家庭福利增加了6.4%。然而,这一增长在农村妇女中更为显著。因此,研究结果表明,计划生育在缩小城乡差距方面具有潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Household welfare perspective of family planning utilization in Uganda
The rationale for FP use has changed over time to progressively emphasize poverty reduction and welfare improvements. However, literature hasn’t largely matched this change. This study, therefore, sought to contribute to this knowledge gap by exploring the impact of FP on household welfare using consumption per adult equivalent as the measure of household welfare. Data from the Uganda National Panel Survey 2018/19 and 2019/20 waves was used, and the analysis was done using pooled ordinary least squares. Results revealed that fewer male headed households and more of the women not using FP were poor as compared to their counterparts. Results also indicated FP use to increase household welfare by 6.4% among all households. This increase is however more significant for rural women. The results thus indicate the potential of using FP to bridge the rural-urban divide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Devenir un.e résident.e privilégié.e au . Migrations depuis l’Occident, ascensions subversions locales L’État face au phénomène de la migration irrégulière vers l’Europe : à la recherche de la migratoire du Sénégal La protection des réfugiés en Afrique. sile au Sénégal. Le pastoralisme transfrontalier et le droit à la nationalité : quelles perspectives en Afrique Ouest ? Introduction. Post et dé-colonialité dans les champs du droit international et des migrations liées à l’Afrique : comment produire d’autres connaissances?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1