转型中的手工绘画——浅谈数字化时代“以图设计”与人体技术的潜力

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION Pub Date : 2020-04-22 DOI:10.5406/jaesteduc.54.2.0056
Gert Hasenhütl
{"title":"转型中的手工绘画——浅谈数字化时代“以图设计”与人体技术的潜力","authors":"Gert Hasenhütl","doi":"10.5406/jaesteduc.54.2.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper analyzes the transformation of manual drawing in the context of design and art. The historical paradigm shift from \"unselfconscious form-making processes\" to \"design-by-drawing\" is closely associated with the current transformation of manual drawing into \"digital\" or \"spatial sketching.\" It is argued that design-by-drawing has changed our view of manual drawing as a body technique, for example, from hand–eye coordination more toward an aesthetic perspective by coupling certain forms of attention to this technique. Design-by-drawing is transforming manual drawing into diagramming, coding, or modeling within the paradigm of system design. It becomes obvious that the paradigm shift is not based on disruptive but on incremental innovations since the 1960s. An important focus is on the disparity between a deskilling of classical manual abilities and a reskilling of \"body techniques\" by the use of innovative man–machine interfaces. By reviewing the pros and cons of manual drawings from the fields of engineering design, graphic design, and art education, future prospects of the use of manual drawings are shown. Examining historical changes in manual drawing can help in understanding current transformations. The arguments presented can contribute to the development of a new framework for the use of this classic technique in design.","PeriodicalId":45866,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manual Drawing in Transformation: A Brief Assessment of \\\"Design-by-Drawing\\\" and Potentials of a Body Technique in Times of Digitalization\",\"authors\":\"Gert Hasenhütl\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/jaesteduc.54.2.0056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This paper analyzes the transformation of manual drawing in the context of design and art. The historical paradigm shift from \\\"unselfconscious form-making processes\\\" to \\\"design-by-drawing\\\" is closely associated with the current transformation of manual drawing into \\\"digital\\\" or \\\"spatial sketching.\\\" It is argued that design-by-drawing has changed our view of manual drawing as a body technique, for example, from hand–eye coordination more toward an aesthetic perspective by coupling certain forms of attention to this technique. Design-by-drawing is transforming manual drawing into diagramming, coding, or modeling within the paradigm of system design. It becomes obvious that the paradigm shift is not based on disruptive but on incremental innovations since the 1960s. An important focus is on the disparity between a deskilling of classical manual abilities and a reskilling of \\\"body techniques\\\" by the use of innovative man–machine interfaces. By reviewing the pros and cons of manual drawings from the fields of engineering design, graphic design, and art education, future prospects of the use of manual drawings are shown. Examining historical changes in manual drawing can help in understanding current transformations. The arguments presented can contribute to the development of a new framework for the use of this classic technique in design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.54.2.0056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.54.2.0056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:本文分析了手工绘画在设计与艺术语境下的转型。从“无意识的形式制作过程”到“绘图设计”的历史范式转变与当前手工绘图向“数字”或“空间素描”的转变密切相关。有人认为,绘图设计改变了我们对手工绘图作为一种身体技术的看法,例如,通过将某些形式的注意力与这种技术结合起来,从手眼协调更多地转向审美角度。绘图设计是将手工绘图转换为系统设计范例中的绘图、编码或建模。很明显,自上世纪60年代以来,这种范式转变不是基于破坏性创新,而是基于渐进式创新。一个重要的焦点是通过使用创新的人机界面来重新培训传统的手工技能和“身体技术”之间的差异。从工程设计、平面设计、美术教育三个方面对手工制图的优缺点进行了综述,并对手工制图的应用前景进行了展望。检查手工绘图中的历史变化可以帮助理解当前的变化。所提出的论点可以为在设计中使用这种经典技术的新框架的发展做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Manual Drawing in Transformation: A Brief Assessment of "Design-by-Drawing" and Potentials of a Body Technique in Times of Digitalization
Abstract:This paper analyzes the transformation of manual drawing in the context of design and art. The historical paradigm shift from "unselfconscious form-making processes" to "design-by-drawing" is closely associated with the current transformation of manual drawing into "digital" or "spatial sketching." It is argued that design-by-drawing has changed our view of manual drawing as a body technique, for example, from hand–eye coordination more toward an aesthetic perspective by coupling certain forms of attention to this technique. Design-by-drawing is transforming manual drawing into diagramming, coding, or modeling within the paradigm of system design. It becomes obvious that the paradigm shift is not based on disruptive but on incremental innovations since the 1960s. An important focus is on the disparity between a deskilling of classical manual abilities and a reskilling of "body techniques" by the use of innovative man–machine interfaces. By reviewing the pros and cons of manual drawings from the fields of engineering design, graphic design, and art education, future prospects of the use of manual drawings are shown. Examining historical changes in manual drawing can help in understanding current transformations. The arguments presented can contribute to the development of a new framework for the use of this classic technique in design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION
JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aesthetic Education (JAE) is a highly respected interdisciplinary journal that focuses on clarifying the issues of aesthetic education understood in its most extensive meaning. The journal thus welcomes articles on philosophical aesthetics and education, to problem areas in education critical to arts and humanities at all institutional levels; to an understanding of the aesthetic import of the new communications media and environmental aesthetics; and to an understanding of the aesthetic character of humanistic disciplines. The journal is a valuable resource not only to educators, but also to philosophers, art critics and art historians.
期刊最新文献
Art, Eros, and Liberation: Aesthetic Education between Pragmatism and Critical Theory Teaching the Virtue of Kindness through Using Art Works On the Value of Sad Music “The Aberrant Is the Classic”: William Carlos Williams and Literary History A Common Arts Instructional Method and the Logic of Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1