新冠肺炎期间教师的学术诚信视角:加拿大四所大学的混合方法研究

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Canadian Journal of Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-01-05 DOI:10.47678/cjhe.vi0.189783
Sarah Elaine Eaton, B. Stoesz, Katherine Crossman, K. Garwood, A. McKenzie
{"title":"新冠肺炎期间教师的学术诚信视角:加拿大四所大学的混合方法研究","authors":"Sarah Elaine Eaton, B. Stoesz, Katherine Crossman, K. Garwood, A. McKenzie","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.vi0.189783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Faculty members are crucial partners in promoting academic integrity at Canadian universities, but their needs related to academic integrity are neither well documented nor understood. To address this gap, we developed a mixed methods survey to gather faculty perceptions of facilitators and barriers to using the existing academic integrity procedures, policies, resources, and supports required to promote academic integrity. In this article, we report the data collected from 330 participants at four Canadian universities. Responses pointed to the importance of individual factors, such as duty to promote academic integrity, as well as contextual factors, such as teaching load, class size, class format, availability of teaching assistant support, and consistency of policies and procedures, in supporting or hindering academic integrity. We also situated these results within a micro (individual), meso (departmental), macro (institutional), and mega (community) framework. Results from this study contribute to the growing body of empirical evidence about faculty perspectives on academic integrity in Canadian higher education and can inform the continued development of existing academic integrity supports at universities.","PeriodicalId":45878,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faculty Perspectives of Academic Integrity During COVID-19: A Mixed Methods Study of Four Canadian Universities\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Elaine Eaton, B. Stoesz, Katherine Crossman, K. Garwood, A. McKenzie\",\"doi\":\"10.47678/cjhe.vi0.189783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Faculty members are crucial partners in promoting academic integrity at Canadian universities, but their needs related to academic integrity are neither well documented nor understood. To address this gap, we developed a mixed methods survey to gather faculty perceptions of facilitators and barriers to using the existing academic integrity procedures, policies, resources, and supports required to promote academic integrity. In this article, we report the data collected from 330 participants at four Canadian universities. Responses pointed to the importance of individual factors, such as duty to promote academic integrity, as well as contextual factors, such as teaching load, class size, class format, availability of teaching assistant support, and consistency of policies and procedures, in supporting or hindering academic integrity. We also situated these results within a micro (individual), meso (departmental), macro (institutional), and mega (community) framework. Results from this study contribute to the growing body of empirical evidence about faculty perspectives on academic integrity in Canadian higher education and can inform the continued development of existing academic integrity supports at universities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Higher Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.vi0.189783\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.vi0.189783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

教职员工是促进加拿大大学学术诚信的重要合作伙伴,但他们在学术诚信方面的需求既没有得到很好的记录,也没有得到很好的理解。为了解决这一差距,我们开发了一项混合方法调查,以收集教师对使用现有学术诚信程序、政策、资源和促进学术诚信所需支持的促进因素和障碍的看法。在本文中,我们报告了从加拿大四所大学的330名参与者中收集的数据。回应指出了个人因素的重要性,如促进学术诚信的责任,以及环境因素,如教学负荷、班级规模、课程形式、助教支持的可用性,以及政策和程序的一致性,在支持或阻碍学术诚信方面。我们还将这些结果置于微观(个人)、中观(部门)、宏观(机构)和宏观(社区)框架中。本研究的结果为加拿大高等教育中教师对学术诚信的看法提供了越来越多的经验证据,并可以为大学现有学术诚信支持的持续发展提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Faculty Perspectives of Academic Integrity During COVID-19: A Mixed Methods Study of Four Canadian Universities
Faculty members are crucial partners in promoting academic integrity at Canadian universities, but their needs related to academic integrity are neither well documented nor understood. To address this gap, we developed a mixed methods survey to gather faculty perceptions of facilitators and barriers to using the existing academic integrity procedures, policies, resources, and supports required to promote academic integrity. In this article, we report the data collected from 330 participants at four Canadian universities. Responses pointed to the importance of individual factors, such as duty to promote academic integrity, as well as contextual factors, such as teaching load, class size, class format, availability of teaching assistant support, and consistency of policies and procedures, in supporting or hindering academic integrity. We also situated these results within a micro (individual), meso (departmental), macro (institutional), and mega (community) framework. Results from this study contribute to the growing body of empirical evidence about faculty perspectives on academic integrity in Canadian higher education and can inform the continued development of existing academic integrity supports at universities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Higher Education
Canadian Journal of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lessons from Our Sweetgrass Baskets: A Wholistic Vision of Academic Success for Indigenous Women in Higher Education From Diversity to Inclusion: Centring the Voices of Undergraduate Engineering Students Book review of "Global University Rankings and the Politics of Knowledge" Book Review of "Teaching About Sex and Sexualities in Higher Education" Book Review of "International Students in Higher Education: Language, Identity, and Experience From a Holistic Perspective"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1