{"title":"转喻、反身夸张和广义反身关系","authors":"J. Barnden","doi":"10.1075/rcl.00100.bar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n I explore some relationships between metonymy and a special type of hyperbole that I call reflexive\n hyperbole. Reflexive hyperbole provides a unified, simple explanation of certain natural meanings of statements such\n as the following: Sailing is Mary’s life, The undersea sculptures became the ocean, When Sally watched the film she became\n James Bond, I am Charlie Hebdo, John is Hitler, The internet is cocaine and I am Amsterdam. The\n meanings, while of seemingly disparate types, are deeply united: they are all hyperbolic about some contextually salient\n relationship that has a special property that I call “broad reflexivity.” Although a few of the types of meaning of interest have\n metonymic aspects (or metaphorical aspects), reflexive hyperbole cannot just be explained by a straightforward application of\n metonymy theory (or metaphor theory). Indeed, I argue instead for a dependency in the converse direction: that much and perhaps\n even all metonymy is rooted – if sometimes slightly indirectly – in broadly reflexive relationships, though not usually in a\n hyperbolic way.","PeriodicalId":51932,"journal":{"name":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metonymy, reflexive hyperbole and broadly reflexive relationships\",\"authors\":\"J. Barnden\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/rcl.00100.bar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n I explore some relationships between metonymy and a special type of hyperbole that I call reflexive\\n hyperbole. Reflexive hyperbole provides a unified, simple explanation of certain natural meanings of statements such\\n as the following: Sailing is Mary’s life, The undersea sculptures became the ocean, When Sally watched the film she became\\n James Bond, I am Charlie Hebdo, John is Hitler, The internet is cocaine and I am Amsterdam. The\\n meanings, while of seemingly disparate types, are deeply united: they are all hyperbolic about some contextually salient\\n relationship that has a special property that I call “broad reflexivity.” Although a few of the types of meaning of interest have\\n metonymic aspects (or metaphorical aspects), reflexive hyperbole cannot just be explained by a straightforward application of\\n metonymy theory (or metaphor theory). Indeed, I argue instead for a dependency in the converse direction: that much and perhaps\\n even all metonymy is rooted – if sometimes slightly indirectly – in broadly reflexive relationships, though not usually in a\\n hyperbolic way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Cognitive Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Cognitive Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00100.bar\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00100.bar","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Metonymy, reflexive hyperbole and broadly reflexive relationships
I explore some relationships between metonymy and a special type of hyperbole that I call reflexive
hyperbole. Reflexive hyperbole provides a unified, simple explanation of certain natural meanings of statements such
as the following: Sailing is Mary’s life, The undersea sculptures became the ocean, When Sally watched the film she became
James Bond, I am Charlie Hebdo, John is Hitler, The internet is cocaine and I am Amsterdam. The
meanings, while of seemingly disparate types, are deeply united: they are all hyperbolic about some contextually salient
relationship that has a special property that I call “broad reflexivity.” Although a few of the types of meaning of interest have
metonymic aspects (or metaphorical aspects), reflexive hyperbole cannot just be explained by a straightforward application of
metonymy theory (or metaphor theory). Indeed, I argue instead for a dependency in the converse direction: that much and perhaps
even all metonymy is rooted – if sometimes slightly indirectly – in broadly reflexive relationships, though not usually in a
hyperbolic way.