{"title":"澳大利亚的肉是什么","authors":"R. Warner, E. P. Bittner, H. Ashman","doi":"10.2527/AF.2017.0443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"• In 2014, Australia was the highest consumer of \"meat\" (defined as beef, pork, chicken, and lamb) in the world, consuming 90.21 kg of meat per capita per year. • The definition of “meat” in Australia is diverse and varies widely among consumers, health professionals, and regulators. • To the consumer, flesh/tissue from all living animals is considered meat, and the “most meaty” to “least meaty” was beef/sheepmeat/ pork > chicken > hamburger/salmon/trout > crayfish > heart > kidney/liver/pig trotter > tripe/cultured meat > witchetty grub/ grasshopper/brains. Burgers made from vegetable protein were considered “not meat.” • From the point of view of the health professional, only red meat (muscle from beef, sheep, goat, buffalo, kangaroo, camel, deer, pig or rabbit carcasses) is considered “meat,” and poultry, fish, and offal (internal organs of the carcass such as brain, heart, kidney, liver, pancreas, spleen, thymus, and tripe) are considered “not meat.” • To the regulator, fish is not described as meat whereas all poultry and red meat is considered “meat.” Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) code classifies offal as non-meat, whereas the FSANZ Primary Production Processing Standards consider offal as meat. • It may be prudent for Australian regulators to consider standardizing their descriptions of meat. • Health professionals appear to use different definitions for “meat” compared with both consumers and regulators. This is likely because they consider any food from a nutritional point of view.","PeriodicalId":48645,"journal":{"name":"Animal Frontiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2527/AF.2017.0443","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is meat in Australia\",\"authors\":\"R. Warner, E. P. Bittner, H. Ashman\",\"doi\":\"10.2527/AF.2017.0443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"• In 2014, Australia was the highest consumer of \\\"meat\\\" (defined as beef, pork, chicken, and lamb) in the world, consuming 90.21 kg of meat per capita per year. • The definition of “meat” in Australia is diverse and varies widely among consumers, health professionals, and regulators. • To the consumer, flesh/tissue from all living animals is considered meat, and the “most meaty” to “least meaty” was beef/sheepmeat/ pork > chicken > hamburger/salmon/trout > crayfish > heart > kidney/liver/pig trotter > tripe/cultured meat > witchetty grub/ grasshopper/brains. Burgers made from vegetable protein were considered “not meat.” • From the point of view of the health professional, only red meat (muscle from beef, sheep, goat, buffalo, kangaroo, camel, deer, pig or rabbit carcasses) is considered “meat,” and poultry, fish, and offal (internal organs of the carcass such as brain, heart, kidney, liver, pancreas, spleen, thymus, and tripe) are considered “not meat.” • To the regulator, fish is not described as meat whereas all poultry and red meat is considered “meat.” Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) code classifies offal as non-meat, whereas the FSANZ Primary Production Processing Standards consider offal as meat. • It may be prudent for Australian regulators to consider standardizing their descriptions of meat. • Health professionals appear to use different definitions for “meat” compared with both consumers and regulators. This is likely because they consider any food from a nutritional point of view.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Frontiers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2527/AF.2017.0443\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2527/AF.2017.0443\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2527/AF.2017.0443","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
• In 2014, Australia was the highest consumer of "meat" (defined as beef, pork, chicken, and lamb) in the world, consuming 90.21 kg of meat per capita per year. • The definition of “meat” in Australia is diverse and varies widely among consumers, health professionals, and regulators. • To the consumer, flesh/tissue from all living animals is considered meat, and the “most meaty” to “least meaty” was beef/sheepmeat/ pork > chicken > hamburger/salmon/trout > crayfish > heart > kidney/liver/pig trotter > tripe/cultured meat > witchetty grub/ grasshopper/brains. Burgers made from vegetable protein were considered “not meat.” • From the point of view of the health professional, only red meat (muscle from beef, sheep, goat, buffalo, kangaroo, camel, deer, pig or rabbit carcasses) is considered “meat,” and poultry, fish, and offal (internal organs of the carcass such as brain, heart, kidney, liver, pancreas, spleen, thymus, and tripe) are considered “not meat.” • To the regulator, fish is not described as meat whereas all poultry and red meat is considered “meat.” Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) code classifies offal as non-meat, whereas the FSANZ Primary Production Processing Standards consider offal as meat. • It may be prudent for Australian regulators to consider standardizing their descriptions of meat. • Health professionals appear to use different definitions for “meat” compared with both consumers and regulators. This is likely because they consider any food from a nutritional point of view.
期刊介绍:
Animal Frontiers is the official journal of the following globally active professional animal science societies:
ASAS, the American Society of Animal Science
CSAS, the Canadian Society of Animal Science
EAAP, the European Federation of Animal Science
AMSA, the American Meat Science Association
These organizations are dedicated to the advancement and dissemination of science-based knowledge concerning animal agriculture. Animal Frontiers provides a novel forum for innovative and timely perspectives that have relevance to understanding the complex dynamics at work through animal agriculture. Animal Frontiers publishes discussion and position papers that present several international perspectives on the status of high-impact, global issues in animal agriculture. Every issue will explore a theme of broad and current interest within animal science and animal agriculture.