地膜在土壤中的生物降解评价:方法学综述

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2021-11-16 DOI:10.4081/ija.2021.1936
M. Francioni, A. Kishimoto-Mo, S. Tsuboi, Yuko Takada Hoshino
{"title":"地膜在土壤中的生物降解评价:方法学综述","authors":"M. Francioni, A. Kishimoto-Mo, S. Tsuboi, Yuko Takada Hoshino","doi":"10.4081/ija.2021.1936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plastic mulch films are widely used in agriculture, but most are not biodegradable in soil. Biodegradable mulch films are blends of different polymers whose composition-ratios vary notably from one product to another. Their degradation rates vary greatly according to the physio-chemical characteristics of the product and according to the properties of the soil and its microbial activity. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the methods used to estimate the biodegradation performances of biodegradable plastics in the soil. In line with this objective, 80 papers were selected and systematically analyzed to extract information on the characteristics of the soil used in the experiments, the type of polymer analyzed, and the methods used to estimate biodegradation in soil environment. Our systematic analysis showed that studies were carried out under both laboratory-controlled and open-field conditions, with different approaches involving visual analysis, mass loss measurements, spectroscopy, and CO2 measurements. A linear estimation of biodegradation performance for four of the most common biodegradable polymers (i.e., polybutylene succinate, polybutylene succinate-co-adipate, polylactic acid, and polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate), either pure or blended, showed a very wide range of results that appear only partially comparable. Many of the analyzed papers did not report soil characteristics at all, despite soil being one of the most important factors in the biodegradation process. Although methodologies for estimating biodegradation are well developed, at least under laboratory-controlled conditions, there is a need for a shared methodology to make results comparable among different experiments. Within such a shared methodology, visual analysis or mass loss measurements, despite not being able to scientifically prove the biodegradation of polymers, should not be discarded a priori as they might be useful indicators especially for open field experiments. When using indirect biodegradation indicators such as visual analysis or mass loss, it is necessary to couple them with CO2 measurements or to use materials whose biodegradability in the soil environment has already been tested.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the mulch films biodegradation in soil: a methodological review\",\"authors\":\"M. Francioni, A. Kishimoto-Mo, S. Tsuboi, Yuko Takada Hoshino\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/ija.2021.1936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Plastic mulch films are widely used in agriculture, but most are not biodegradable in soil. Biodegradable mulch films are blends of different polymers whose composition-ratios vary notably from one product to another. Their degradation rates vary greatly according to the physio-chemical characteristics of the product and according to the properties of the soil and its microbial activity. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the methods used to estimate the biodegradation performances of biodegradable plastics in the soil. In line with this objective, 80 papers were selected and systematically analyzed to extract information on the characteristics of the soil used in the experiments, the type of polymer analyzed, and the methods used to estimate biodegradation in soil environment. Our systematic analysis showed that studies were carried out under both laboratory-controlled and open-field conditions, with different approaches involving visual analysis, mass loss measurements, spectroscopy, and CO2 measurements. A linear estimation of biodegradation performance for four of the most common biodegradable polymers (i.e., polybutylene succinate, polybutylene succinate-co-adipate, polylactic acid, and polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate), either pure or blended, showed a very wide range of results that appear only partially comparable. Many of the analyzed papers did not report soil characteristics at all, despite soil being one of the most important factors in the biodegradation process. Although methodologies for estimating biodegradation are well developed, at least under laboratory-controlled conditions, there is a need for a shared methodology to make results comparable among different experiments. Within such a shared methodology, visual analysis or mass loss measurements, despite not being able to scientifically prove the biodegradation of polymers, should not be discarded a priori as they might be useful indicators especially for open field experiments. When using indirect biodegradation indicators such as visual analysis or mass loss, it is necessary to couple them with CO2 measurements or to use materials whose biodegradability in the soil environment has already been tested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2021.1936\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2021.1936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

地膜广泛应用于农业,但大多数地膜在土壤中不能生物降解。可生物降解地膜是不同聚合物的混合物,其组成比例因产品而异。它们的降解速率根据产品的理化特性、土壤性质及其微生物活性而有很大差异。本文综述了生物降解塑料在土壤中的生物降解性能的评价方法。根据这一目标,我们选择并系统分析了80篇论文,以提取实验中使用的土壤特征,分析的聚合物类型以及用于估计土壤环境中生物降解的方法的信息。我们的系统分析表明,研究是在实验室控制和露天条件下进行的,采用了不同的方法,包括视觉分析、质量损失测量、光谱和二氧化碳测量。对四种最常见的可生物降解聚合物(即,聚丁二酸丁二酯、聚丁二酸丁二酯-共己二酸酯、聚乳酸和聚丁二酸丁二酯-共对苯二甲酸酯)的生物降解性能进行线性估计,无论是纯的还是混合的,都显示了非常广泛的结果,似乎只有部分可比性。尽管土壤是生物降解过程中最重要的因素之一,但许多被分析的论文根本没有报告土壤特征。虽然估计生物降解的方法已经发展得很好,至少在实验室控制的条件下,需要一种共同的方法,使不同实验之间的结果具有可比性。在这种共同的方法中,目测分析或质量损失测量,尽管不能科学地证明聚合物的生物降解,但不应先验地抛弃,因为它们可能是有用的指标,特别是对于露天实验。在使用目测分析或质量损失等间接生物降解指标时,有必要将它们与二氧化碳测量相结合,或使用已经测试过土壤环境中生物降解性的材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the mulch films biodegradation in soil: a methodological review
Plastic mulch films are widely used in agriculture, but most are not biodegradable in soil. Biodegradable mulch films are blends of different polymers whose composition-ratios vary notably from one product to another. Their degradation rates vary greatly according to the physio-chemical characteristics of the product and according to the properties of the soil and its microbial activity. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the methods used to estimate the biodegradation performances of biodegradable plastics in the soil. In line with this objective, 80 papers were selected and systematically analyzed to extract information on the characteristics of the soil used in the experiments, the type of polymer analyzed, and the methods used to estimate biodegradation in soil environment. Our systematic analysis showed that studies were carried out under both laboratory-controlled and open-field conditions, with different approaches involving visual analysis, mass loss measurements, spectroscopy, and CO2 measurements. A linear estimation of biodegradation performance for four of the most common biodegradable polymers (i.e., polybutylene succinate, polybutylene succinate-co-adipate, polylactic acid, and polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate), either pure or blended, showed a very wide range of results that appear only partially comparable. Many of the analyzed papers did not report soil characteristics at all, despite soil being one of the most important factors in the biodegradation process. Although methodologies for estimating biodegradation are well developed, at least under laboratory-controlled conditions, there is a need for a shared methodology to make results comparable among different experiments. Within such a shared methodology, visual analysis or mass loss measurements, despite not being able to scientifically prove the biodegradation of polymers, should not be discarded a priori as they might be useful indicators especially for open field experiments. When using indirect biodegradation indicators such as visual analysis or mass loss, it is necessary to couple them with CO2 measurements or to use materials whose biodegradability in the soil environment has already been tested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1