基于异构安全考虑的出行者速度-路径联合选择行为建模

IF 12.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Analytic Methods in Accident Research Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amar.2022.100253
Chunyang Han , Guangming Xu , Amjad Pervez , Fan Gao , Helai Huang , Xin Pei , Yi Zhang
{"title":"基于异构安全考虑的出行者速度-路径联合选择行为建模","authors":"Chunyang Han ,&nbsp;Guangming Xu ,&nbsp;Amjad Pervez ,&nbsp;Fan Gao ,&nbsp;Helai Huang ,&nbsp;Xin Pei ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.amar.2022.100253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, a speed-route joint choice model considering traveler’s safety concerns is proposed to concurrently model traveler’s safety-oriented travel speed and route choice behavior. Specifically, the safe-speed choice behavior is modeled as a trade-off process between perceived traffic safety and efficiency using a disutility function. The safe-route choice behavior is described by the proposed Mean-excess Crash Risk Cost model, where the route safety is modeled as a random variable following a specific distribution, and traveler’s concerns about both reliability and unreliability aspects of safety variability are considered. The model is accommodative to account for the random nature and the traveler’s perception of traffic safety. Also, the travel time cost is considered, which is depicted as a parallel criterion of travel safety in the route choice model. Moreover, the heterogeneities of travelers’ safety concerns in both the choices of speed and route are considered in the proposed joint model. Then, the study formulated the equilibrium problem with the two behavior elements (speed and route) and two choice criteria (safety and time), based on the assumption that all travelers tend to maximize their disutility when choosing speed while minimizing their travel safety variability and travel time. To illustrate the model, Nguyen and Dupuis, Sioux falls, and Changsha arterial networks are conducted as numerical studies. The result demonstrates the model’s capability in depicting travelers’ trade-off between safety and time when selecting the optimal travel speed. Considering the impact of route safety unreliability makes the model sensible to describe travelers’ safety-concerned route choice behavior. The model is also flexible to account for travelers’ crash risk aversion heterogeneity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47520,"journal":{"name":"Analytic Methods in Accident Research","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100253"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling traveler’s speed-route joint choice behavior with heterogeneous safety concern\",\"authors\":\"Chunyang Han ,&nbsp;Guangming Xu ,&nbsp;Amjad Pervez ,&nbsp;Fan Gao ,&nbsp;Helai Huang ,&nbsp;Xin Pei ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amar.2022.100253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, a speed-route joint choice model considering traveler’s safety concerns is proposed to concurrently model traveler’s safety-oriented travel speed and route choice behavior. Specifically, the safe-speed choice behavior is modeled as a trade-off process between perceived traffic safety and efficiency using a disutility function. The safe-route choice behavior is described by the proposed Mean-excess Crash Risk Cost model, where the route safety is modeled as a random variable following a specific distribution, and traveler’s concerns about both reliability and unreliability aspects of safety variability are considered. The model is accommodative to account for the random nature and the traveler’s perception of traffic safety. Also, the travel time cost is considered, which is depicted as a parallel criterion of travel safety in the route choice model. Moreover, the heterogeneities of travelers’ safety concerns in both the choices of speed and route are considered in the proposed joint model. Then, the study formulated the equilibrium problem with the two behavior elements (speed and route) and two choice criteria (safety and time), based on the assumption that all travelers tend to maximize their disutility when choosing speed while minimizing their travel safety variability and travel time. To illustrate the model, Nguyen and Dupuis, Sioux falls, and Changsha arterial networks are conducted as numerical studies. The result demonstrates the model’s capability in depicting travelers’ trade-off between safety and time when selecting the optimal travel speed. Considering the impact of route safety unreliability makes the model sensible to describe travelers’ safety-concerned route choice behavior. The model is also flexible to account for travelers’ crash risk aversion heterogeneity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytic Methods in Accident Research\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytic Methods in Accident Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213665722000422\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytic Methods in Accident Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213665722000422","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了考虑出行者安全考虑的速度-路径联合选择模型,对出行者以安全为导向的出行速度和路径选择行为进行并行建模。具体而言,安全速度选择行为被建模为感知交通安全和效率之间的权衡过程,使用负效用函数。安全路线选择行为由提出的平均超额碰撞风险成本模型来描述,该模型将路线安全建模为遵循特定分布的随机变量,并且考虑了出行者对安全可变性的可靠性和不可靠性方面的关注。该模型能够很好地考虑交通的随机性和出行者对交通安全的感知。同时,在路线选择模型中考虑了出行时间成本,将其描述为出行安全的并行准则。此外,该联合模型还考虑了出行者在速度和路线选择上安全关注点的异质性。然后,在假设所有出行者在选择速度时都倾向于最大化自己的负效用,同时最小化自己的出行安全变异性和出行时间的基础上,构建了包含两个行为要素(速度和路线)和两个选择标准(安全和时间)的均衡问题。为了说明该模型,Nguyen和Dupuis、Sioux falls和长沙的动脉网络进行了数值研究。结果表明,该模型能够很好地描述出行者在选择最优出行速度时在安全与时间之间的权衡。考虑路线安全不可靠性的影响,使得该模型更合理地描述出行者考虑安全的路线选择行为。该模型还可以灵活地解释旅行者的碰撞风险厌恶异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling traveler’s speed-route joint choice behavior with heterogeneous safety concern

In this study, a speed-route joint choice model considering traveler’s safety concerns is proposed to concurrently model traveler’s safety-oriented travel speed and route choice behavior. Specifically, the safe-speed choice behavior is modeled as a trade-off process between perceived traffic safety and efficiency using a disutility function. The safe-route choice behavior is described by the proposed Mean-excess Crash Risk Cost model, where the route safety is modeled as a random variable following a specific distribution, and traveler’s concerns about both reliability and unreliability aspects of safety variability are considered. The model is accommodative to account for the random nature and the traveler’s perception of traffic safety. Also, the travel time cost is considered, which is depicted as a parallel criterion of travel safety in the route choice model. Moreover, the heterogeneities of travelers’ safety concerns in both the choices of speed and route are considered in the proposed joint model. Then, the study formulated the equilibrium problem with the two behavior elements (speed and route) and two choice criteria (safety and time), based on the assumption that all travelers tend to maximize their disutility when choosing speed while minimizing their travel safety variability and travel time. To illustrate the model, Nguyen and Dupuis, Sioux falls, and Changsha arterial networks are conducted as numerical studies. The result demonstrates the model’s capability in depicting travelers’ trade-off between safety and time when selecting the optimal travel speed. Considering the impact of route safety unreliability makes the model sensible to describe travelers’ safety-concerned route choice behavior. The model is also flexible to account for travelers’ crash risk aversion heterogeneity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.10
自引率
34.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Analytic Methods in Accident Research is a journal that publishes articles related to the development and application of advanced statistical and econometric methods in studying vehicle crashes and other accidents. The journal aims to demonstrate how these innovative approaches can provide new insights into the factors influencing the occurrence and severity of accidents, thereby offering guidance for implementing appropriate preventive measures. While the journal primarily focuses on the analytic approach, it also accepts articles covering various aspects of transportation safety (such as road, pedestrian, air, rail, and water safety), construction safety, and other areas where human behavior, machine failures, or system failures lead to property damage or bodily harm.
期刊最新文献
Determinants influencing alcohol-related two-vehicle crash severity: A multivariate Bayesian hierarchical random parameters correlated outcomes logit model Effects of sample size on pedestrian crash risk estimation from traffic conflicts using extreme value models Editorial Board A cross-comparison of different extreme value modeling techniques for traffic conflict-based crash risk estimation The role of posted speed limit on pedestrian and bicycle injury severities: An investigation into systematic and unobserved heterogeneities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1