“我想成为一个玩具”

IF 1.6 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Language and Sexuality Pub Date : 2018-08-27 DOI:10.1075/JLS.17016.WEB
Lexi Webster
{"title":"“我想成为一个玩具”","authors":"Lexi Webster","doi":"10.1075/JLS.17016.WEB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The paradigmatic transgender woman is often negatively oversexualised, pornographised and fetishised in mainstream\n conceptualisations and discourses. However, self-sexualisation by transgender individuals is often portrayed as a (sex-)positive\n social phenomenon. Little research has been conducted that analyses the self-sexualisation strategies of the multiple\n instantiations of gender-variant identity, including transmasculine and non-binary social actors. This paper uses a corpus-informed\n socio-cognitive approach to critical discourse studies to identify differences between the self-sexualisation strategies and\n underpinning cognitive models of different gender-variant user-groups on Twitter. 2,565 users are coded into five categories: (1)\n transfeminine; (2) transmasculine; (3) transsexual; (4) transvestite; (5) non-binary. Findings show that transvestite- and\n transsexual-identifying users most closely fit the pornographised and fetishised conceptualisation, whilst non-binary users are the\n least self-sexualising user-group.","PeriodicalId":36680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“I wanna be a toy”\",\"authors\":\"Lexi Webster\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/JLS.17016.WEB\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The paradigmatic transgender woman is often negatively oversexualised, pornographised and fetishised in mainstream\\n conceptualisations and discourses. However, self-sexualisation by transgender individuals is often portrayed as a (sex-)positive\\n social phenomenon. Little research has been conducted that analyses the self-sexualisation strategies of the multiple\\n instantiations of gender-variant identity, including transmasculine and non-binary social actors. This paper uses a corpus-informed\\n socio-cognitive approach to critical discourse studies to identify differences between the self-sexualisation strategies and\\n underpinning cognitive models of different gender-variant user-groups on Twitter. 2,565 users are coded into five categories: (1)\\n transfeminine; (2) transmasculine; (3) transsexual; (4) transvestite; (5) non-binary. Findings show that transvestite- and\\n transsexual-identifying users most closely fit the pornographised and fetishised conceptualisation, whilst non-binary users are the\\n least self-sexualising user-group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/JLS.17016.WEB\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JLS.17016.WEB","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在主流观念和话语中,典型的跨性别女性往往被消极地过度性化、色情化和恋物化。然而,变性人的自我性化通常被描绘成一种(性)积极的社会现象。很少有研究分析性别变异身份的多种实例的自我性化策略,包括跨性别和非二元社会行动者。本文采用基于语料的社会认知方法进行批判性话语研究,以确定Twitter上不同性别变异用户群体的自我性别化策略和基础认知模型之间的差异。(2) transmasculine;(3)变性;(4)易装癖者;(5)非二进制。调查结果显示,异装癖和变性认同的用户最符合色情化和恋物化的概念,而非二元用户是自我性化程度最低的用户群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“I wanna be a toy”
The paradigmatic transgender woman is often negatively oversexualised, pornographised and fetishised in mainstream conceptualisations and discourses. However, self-sexualisation by transgender individuals is often portrayed as a (sex-)positive social phenomenon. Little research has been conducted that analyses the self-sexualisation strategies of the multiple instantiations of gender-variant identity, including transmasculine and non-binary social actors. This paper uses a corpus-informed socio-cognitive approach to critical discourse studies to identify differences between the self-sexualisation strategies and underpinning cognitive models of different gender-variant user-groups on Twitter. 2,565 users are coded into five categories: (1) transfeminine; (2) transmasculine; (3) transsexual; (4) transvestite; (5) non-binary. Findings show that transvestite- and transsexual-identifying users most closely fit the pornographised and fetishised conceptualisation, whilst non-binary users are the least self-sexualising user-group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Journal of Language and Sexuality Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Queer immigrants’ performative identity and cultural marginality in the context of queering ESL education Examining gay male discursive practices in hook-up apps The discursive manifestation of normativities in coming-out-to-family discourses in Japanese social media Navigating ‘safe’ and ‘non-safe’ queer spaces Review of Cordoba (2022): Non-Binary Gender Identities: The Language of Becoming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1