20年的美国纳米专利:维护更新评分作为专利价值的指标

IF 2.2 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE World Patent Information Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wpi.2023.102178

Alan L. Porter , Mark Markley , Richard Snead , Nils C. Newman

{"title":"20年的美国纳米专利:维护更新评分作为专利价值的指标","authors":"Alan L. Porter , Mark Markley , Richard Snead , Nils C. Newman","doi":"10.1016/j.wpi.2023.102178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper introduces a new measure of patent value – Maintenance Renewal Score (MRSc) – reflecting assignee valuing the patent by paying successive renewal fees. We generate MRSc's for nanotechnology patents issued by the US Patent Office from 1999 through 2009, with US assignees and US inventors. Patenting increases over this period, coincident with increased US funding of nanotechnology R&D. We compare maintenance rates over the period, and against a comparison set of all 1999 USPTO grants to US inventors/assignees. We find differences in propensity to maintain the nanopatents by institution type, technological sector, and patent complexity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51794,"journal":{"name":"World Patent Information","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 102178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Twenty years of US nanopatenting: Maintenance renewal scoring as an indicator of patent value\",\"authors\":\"Alan L. Porter , Mark Markley , Richard Snead , Nils C. Newman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wpi.2023.102178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper introduces a new measure of patent value – Maintenance Renewal Score (MRSc) – reflecting assignee valuing the patent by paying successive renewal fees. We generate MRSc's for nanotechnology patents issued by the US Patent Office from 1999 through 2009, with US assignees and US inventors. Patenting increases over this period, coincident with increased US funding of nanotechnology R&D. We compare maintenance rates over the period, and against a comparison set of all 1999 USPTO grants to US inventors/assignees. We find differences in propensity to maintain the nanopatents by institution type, technological sector, and patent complexity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Patent Information\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Patent Information\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S017221902300008X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Patent Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S017221902300008X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文引入了一种新的专利价值度量方法——维持续期评分(MRSc)，它反映了受让人通过支付连续续期费用来评估专利的价值。我们为美国专利局从1999年到2009年颁发的纳米技术专利生成MRSc，美国受让人和美国发明者。与此同时，美国对纳米技术研发的资助也在增加。我们比较了这一时期的维护率，并与1999年美国专利商标局授予美国发明人/受让人的所有补助金的比较集进行了比较。我们发现机构类型、技术部门和专利复杂性在维持纳米专利的倾向上存在差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Twenty years of US nanopatenting: Maintenance renewal scoring as an indicator of patent value

This paper introduces a new measure of patent value – Maintenance Renewal Score (MRSc) – reflecting assignee valuing the patent by paying successive renewal fees. We generate MRSc's for nanotechnology patents issued by the US Patent Office from 1999 through 2009, with US assignees and US inventors. Patenting increases over this period, coincident with increased US funding of nanotechnology R&D. We compare maintenance rates over the period, and against a comparison set of all 1999 USPTO grants to US inventors/assignees. We find differences in propensity to maintain the nanopatents by institution type, technological sector, and patent complexity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

World Patent Information INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

18.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim of World Patent Information is to provide a worldwide forum for the exchange of information between people working professionally in the field of Industrial Property information and documentation and to promote the widest possible use of the associated literature. Regular features include: papers concerned with all aspects of Industrial Property information and documentation; new regulations pertinent to Industrial Property information and documentation; short reports on relevant meetings and conferences; bibliographies, together with book and literature reviews.